Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering
Posted by BB on 5/17/08
That is your 'admission' huh? Looks like you are trying to defame me. You are on notice to cease. Have a nice weekend. On 5/17/08, David wrote: > Deborah, here's the info that was posted recently about > wiretapping. > *************************************************** > > Posted by BB on 4/04/08 > > My pleasure. Have a good weekend. > > On 4/04/08, Marcus wrote: >> BB, thanks for the written admission regarding the wiretaps > and secret >> videos. I have passed it on to the attorneys. >> >> On 4/04/08, BB wrote: >>> Marcus, >>> >>> Any chance you can post the key documents that defense > might want to >>> see? We don't need any of the wiretaps or secret videos, > because they >>> are case specific, but anything that identifies the > plaintiff experts >>> or there silly testimony would be appreciated. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Look outside. Who's in that car? Smile! >>> > > > ************************************************* > > > > On 5/17/08, Deborah wrote: >> David, >> >> Do you have link to this article? >> >> >> Where did someone admit wiretapping, do you have a copy? >> >> In the last 6 months I had, once again, my mail tampered > with, >> and odd problems with my phone service. Also, someone > actually >> tried to get into my medical records. Tracking it down and >> proving it is almost impossible due to constraints of man >> power and access. >> >> I get a bit anxious when this sort of stuff happens in >> proximity of place or time after what I have been through. >> The additional insult of having your privacy violated, mail >> tampering, phone tampering, burglaries, etc... after having >> the audacity to stand up for yourself in a civil arena after >> having had chemical assaults on your person, in your own > home, >> by persons who regularly made unauthorized entries into your >> home is just SOOO CREEPY. Then to have some ignorant buffoon >> suggest you are paranoid because you get jumpy when odd > things >> begin to occur is the ultimate irony. >> >> >> >> >> On 5/16/08, David wrote: >>> To the person on this chatboard who recently admitted >>> wiretapping...here's a news article that may be of >>> interest. >>> >>> "A Hollywood private investigator was convicted Thursday >>> on federal racketeering and other charges for digging up >>> dirt for his well-heeled clients to use in lawsuits, >>> divorces and contract disputes..." >>> >>> He was accused of wiretapping and running names through >>> law enforcement databases to help clients. >>> >>> "The jury found (him) guilty of racketeering and >>> racketeering conspiracy, along with wire fraud, identity >>> theft, conspiracy to intercept or use wire communications >>> and manufacture or possession of a wiretapping device, 76 >>> counts in all."
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/16/08, by David.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by Deborah.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by Deborah.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by David.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by David.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by Deborah.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by BB.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by Sharon.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by BB.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by Sharon.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/17/08, by BB.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/17/08, by Sharon.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/17/08, by BB.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/18/08, by Sharon.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/18/08, by BB.
- Re: Theater of the Absurd, 5/18/08, by Myco X.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/18/08, by educator.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/18/08, by Sharon.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/18/08, by BB.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/18/08, by BB.
- Re: Theater of the Absurd, 5/20/08, by v.
|