Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering
Posted by Sharon on 5/17/08
BB, Deliberately dissiminating false information about WHO? What potential
liabilities may incur? From Annonymous Plaintiff BB? You are such a
joke. Now back to some serious stuff. Oh never mind. You are waste of my
time. Back to not reading your diatribes.
On 5/17/08, BB wrote:
> Dear Sharon,
>
> I've previously informed you I have no knowledge of a chicago mold
> case. Or even an illinois case. Stop suggesting that I do, as you are
> deliberately dessiminating FALSE INFORMATION and may incur liabilities
> for doing so. Is that clear?
>
> That said, I'm curious what case you are talking about. What is it?
> Have a name or identifier?
>
>
> On 5/17/08, Sharon wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I think it is looking more and more like BB does have something to
>> do with the Chicago mold case that has been discussed on this board.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/17/08, BB wrote:
>>> That is your 'admission' huh? Looks like you are trying to defame
>>> me. You are on notice to cease. Have a nice weekend.
>>>
>>> On 5/17/08, David wrote:
>>>> Deborah, here's the info that was posted recently about
>>>> wiretapping.
>>>> ***************************************************
>>>>
>>>> Posted by BB on 4/04/08
>>>>
>>>> My pleasure. Have a good weekend.
>>>>
>>>> On 4/04/08, Marcus wrote:
>>>>> BB, thanks for the written admission regarding the wiretaps
>>>> and secret
>>>>> videos. I have passed it on to the attorneys.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/04/08, BB wrote:
>>>>>> Marcus,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any chance you can post the key documents that defense
>>>> might want to
>>>>>> see? We don't need any of the wiretaps or secret videos,
>>>> because they
>>>>>> are case specific, but anything that identifies the
>>>> plaintiff experts
>>>>>> or there silly testimony would be appreciated.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Look outside. Who's in that car? Smile!
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *************************************************
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 5/17/08, Deborah wrote:
>>>>> David,
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you have link to this article?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Where did someone admit wiretapping, do you have a copy?
>>>>>
>>>>> In the last 6 months I had, once again, my mail tampered
>>>> with,
>>>>> and odd problems with my phone service. Also, someone
>>>> actually
>>>>> tried to get into my medical records. Tracking it down and
>>>>> proving it is almost impossible due to constraints of man
>>>>> power and access.
>>>>>
>>>>> I get a bit anxious when this sort of stuff happens in
>>>>> proximity of place or time after what I have been through.
>>>>> The additional insult of having your privacy violated, mail
>>>>> tampering, phone tampering, burglaries, etc... after having
>>>>> the audacity to stand up for yourself in a civil arena after
>>>>> having had chemical assaults on your person, in your own
>>>> home,
>>>>> by persons who regularly made unauthorized entries into your
>>>>> home is just SOOO CREEPY. Then to have some ignorant buffoon
>>>>> suggest you are paranoid because you get jumpy when odd
>>>> things
>>>>> begin to occur is the ultimate irony.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/16/08, David wrote:
>>>>>> To the person on this chatboard who recently admitted
>>>>>> wiretapping...here's a news article that may be of
>>>>>> interest.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "A Hollywood private investigator was convicted Thursday
>>>>>> on federal racketeering and other charges for digging up
>>>>>> dirt for his well-heeled clients to use in lawsuits,
>>>>>> divorces and contract disputes..."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He was accused of wiretapping and running names through
>>>>>> law enforcement databases to help clients.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "The jury found (him) guilty of racketeering and
>>>>>> racketeering conspiracy, along with wire fraud, identity
>>>>>> theft, conspiracy to intercept or use wire communications
>>>>>> and manufacture or possession of a wiretapping device, 76
>>>>>> counts in all."
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/16/08, by David.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by Deborah.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by Deborah.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by David.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by David.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by Deborah.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by BB.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by Sharon.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by BB.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by Sharon.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/17/08, by BB.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/17/08, by Sharon.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/17/08, by BB.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/18/08, by Sharon.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/18/08, by BB.
- Re: Theater of the Absurd, 5/18/08, by Myco X.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/18/08, by educator.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/18/08, by Sharon.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/18/08, by BB.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/18/08, by BB.
- Re: Theater of the Absurd, 5/20/08, by v.
|
1996 - 2007. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.