Re: Private Eye - false information
Posted by BB on 5/18/08
Really? Time will tell. And now you are altering the appearance of educator's post. Making your words look
like his/hers. Bad bad bad. You never learn. On 5/18/08, Sharon wrote:
> Dear Educator,
>
> I could not agree with you more. That is why I rarely even bother to read the
> posts by "BB". It always ends up in some frivilous diatribe. However, I did
> respond to this one on behalf of other board posters. It is absurd that one
> who posts under a pseudoname would imply threat of libel for defamation of
> character. Still, there are those that may be intimidated by this. They need
> to know that BB is just blowing smoke, as usual. They have nothing to fear
> from this entity.
>
>
> On 5/18/08, educator wrote:
>>> I'm sorry, what did you say your real name was? If, as you say, internet
>>> postings are not truly annonymous and you feel your identity is known to
>>> the point that you would make threatening remarks for one writing they
>>> think a cartoon character of "BB" may have something to do with a Chicago
>>> mold case, then why do you even bother posting under a pseudoname?
>>>
>>> And how would I know you are not involved in the Chicago case if I don't
>>> know your real name?
>>
>> You are both acting like a bunch of 2 year olds in a sand box ; Neither of
>> you have said or written anything that important that a detective or anyone
>> else would spend the time or energy trying to break into or even steal for
>> that matter ; Neither of you are conducting reseacha at a level that would
>> contribute to science nor do your medical records warrent the time or energy
>> to read them. It is therfore suggested that you both move on to more
>> important things. The cost of a detective seeking out and even looking at
>> someone's medical records who has been exposed and treated for mold does not
>> merit the time money or energy you both suggest nor has scoiety deemded
>> either of you that imortant to even want to know . You both need to spend
>> time and energy on more eimportant pursuits if you think you are that
>> important in the area of endeaver then prove it with time being spent in a
>> appropiate area of research and then say or post something that will add to
>> the conversation instead of Hot air
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/16/08, by David.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by Deborah.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by Deborah.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by David.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by David.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by Deborah.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by BB.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by Sharon.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by BB.
- Re: Private Eye Convicted of Racketeering, 5/17/08, by Sharon.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/17/08, by BB.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/17/08, by Sharon.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/17/08, by BB.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/18/08, by Sharon.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/18/08, by BB.
- Re: Theater of the Absurd, 5/18/08, by Myco X.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/18/08, by educator.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/18/08, by Sharon.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/18/08, by BB.
- Re: Private Eye - false information, 5/18/08, by BB.
- Re: Theater of the Absurd, 5/20/08, by v.
|
1996 - 2007. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.