Re: DEANO
Posted by Deano on 9/09/08
SICK: The point I am trying to make is that the reference posted by Sharon is a
piece of crap, and lends very little credibility to whatever plight the
workers at the site in question may have. On 9/08/08, sick wrote:
> DEANO
>
> The point I am trying to make is an industrial hygienist is not qualified
to make a determination as
> to serious health conditions resulting from bacterial and/or fungi
exposure/s that can result in
> infectious disease/s.
>
> The only one with the credentials who is qualified is none other than a
Medical DOCTOR. This is
> conveyed to you with reference to the Dr. Larry Rose article. Dr. Rose
was with Cal/EPA for 28
> years and the last few years he was the only Dr. within the entire state
of California OSHA
> program. After his retirement Cal/OSHA never has had another Medical
DOCTOR on board. Now
> unless you are a Medical DOCTOR, and I doubt you are then how can you be
considered an expert
> in the validity of ANY disease?
>
> SHARON
>
> The political person who is in full support of exposing what happened at
Downey and getting
> medical attention and justice for the injured workers is Ralph Nader among
others. MANY MANY
> others are involved.
>
> On 9/08/08, Sharon wrote:
>> I have found that the spam filter does not like the words like "blog"
>> when they are in a link address. The first place to check for needed
>> spaces is typically in a link address.
>>
>> And...as far as who is supporting the injured workers at the Downey site,
>> I don't really know much about that political party. But I do know there
>> are several workers who are claiming to be sick with the exact same
>> symptoms I see over and over and over again after exposure to mold.
>>
>> Are you saying I should not help them get the word out simply because I
>> may or may not agree with everything of those who support them?
>>
>> If I took that attitude, I never would have gotten anywhere at helping to
>> expose the deceit of ACOEM and knocking out their "science" from
>> guideline documents. This is a multi-complicated issue that I can't even
>> think of two people who think exactly the same on everything with it.
>>
>> On 9/08/08, Deano wrote:
>>> I attempted to reply several times, only to get the dreaded “forwarded
>>> to site administrator for review” type message. I have no idea why.
>>>
>>> In reply, the article lacked sound grammar, proof-reading and content
>>> supported by factual references.
>>>
>>> Beyond that, I have no idea of the point you were trying to make with
>>> your tedious cut-n-paste.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/08/08, sick wrote:
>>>> Deano,
>>>>
>>>> Wondering "why" there also wasn't a response from you to to my post
>>> of 9/5/08?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/07/08, Deano wrote:
>>>>> On 9/05/08, Sharon wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, why no comment from you on the Leonard Lopate Show?
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No time as of yet. I'll get around to it.
>>>>
>
Posts on this thread, including this one
- The Downey Toxic He ll Hole, 9/04/08, by Sharon.
- Re: The Downey Toxic He ll Hole, 9/04/08, by Deano.
- Re: The Downey Toxic He ll Hole, 9/05/08, by Sharon.
- Re: The Downey Toxic He ll Hole, 9/05/08, by Sharon.
- Re: The Downey Toxic He ll Hole, 9/05/08, by sick.
- Re: The Downey Toxic He ll Hole, 9/07/08, by Deano.
- Re: The Downey Toxic He ll Hole, 9/07/08, by Deano.
- Re: DEANO, 9/08/08, by sick.
- Re: DEANO, 9/08/08, by Deano.
- Re: DEANO, 9/08/08, by Sharon.
- Re: DEANO, 9/08/08, by sick.
- Re: DEANO, 9/09/08, by doubtful.
- Re: DEANO, 9/09/08, by Deano.
- Re: DEANO, 9/09/08, by Sharon.
- Re: DEANO, 9/09/08, by Deano.
- Re: DEANO, 9/09/08, by Sharon.
- Re: DEANO, 9/09/08, by Deano.
- Re: DEANO, 9/09/08, by sick.
|
1996 - 2007. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.