Re: DEANO
Posted by Sharon on 9/09/08
Deano, You are becoming a bigger advocate for the sick by the minute. Who at NIOSH would
you suggest they call that will do more than just note illness that could,
possibly, maybe, we don't know, be caused by other factors or maybe it is something
that is here and is causing all these people to be ill, or maybe it because Deano
claims to see flying pigs out his window, or...more research is needed? Anyone in
particular they should contact?
On 9/09/08, Deano wrote:
> I think I just saw a pig fly by my window.
>
> At any rate, if it has not yet been attempted, concerned parties at the site may
> wish to consider this:
>
> http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/hhe/HHEprogram.html
>
>
>
>
> On 9/09/08, Sharon wrote:
>> Sick,
>>
>> I am sorry, but I think I have to agree with Deano a bit on this one. I know
> we
>> all try as hard as we can to get info out there in a logical manner over a
> very
>> complex issue, but that piece really did have alot of errors regarding
>> important points.
>>
>> Using the term "epistemology" when meaning "epidemiology" was a biggie error.
>> Deano is right. Errors like that can sometimes do more harm to your message
>> than good. Regardless, I know you all are working hard to get your message out
>> and mistakes do get made. Whatever you decide to send me and request that I
>> send on,I will always send on at your request. And see....even Deano is now
>> trying to help you get your message out properly.
>>
>> I can't wait to show you all some of the references to ToxLaw from my trial.
>> Some of it is serious...but some of it is pretty funny. RemDude, I talked
> about
>> you...nothing bad.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/09/08, Deano wrote:
>>> SICK:
>>>
>>> The point I am trying to make is that the reference posted by Sharon is a
>>> piece of crap, and lends very little credibility to whatever plight the
>>> workers at the site in question may have.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/08/08, sick wrote:
>>>> DEANO
>>>>
>>>> The point I am trying to make is an industrial hygienist is not qualified
>>> to make a determination as
>>>> to serious health conditions resulting from bacterial and/or fungi
>>> exposure/s that can result in
>>>> infectious disease/s.
>>>>
>>>> The only one with the credentials who is qualified is none other than a
>>> Medical DOCTOR. This is
>>>> conveyed to you with reference to the Dr. Larry Rose article. Dr. Rose
>>> was with Cal/EPA for 28
>>>> years and the last few years he was the only Dr. within the entire state
>>> of California OSHA
>>>> program. After his retirement Cal/OSHA never has had another Medical
>>> DOCTOR on board. Now
>>>> unless you are a Medical DOCTOR, and I doubt you are then how can you be
>>> considered an expert
>>>> in the validity of ANY disease?
>>>>
>>>> SHARON
>>>>
>>>> The political person who is in full support of exposing what happened at
>>> Downey and getting
>>>> medical attention and justice for the injured workers is Ralph Nader among
>>> others. MANY MANY
>>>> others are involved.
>>>>
>>>> On 9/08/08, Sharon wrote:
>>>>> I have found that the spam filter does not like the words like "blog"
>>>>> when they are in a link address. The first place to check for needed
>>>>> spaces is typically in a link address.
>>>>>
>>>>> And...as far as who is supporting the injured workers at the Downey site,
>>>>> I don't really know much about that political party. But I do know there
>>>>> are several workers who are claiming to be sick with the exact same
>>>>> symptoms I see over and over and over again after exposure to mold.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you saying I should not help them get the word out simply because I
>>>>> may or may not agree with everything of those who support them?
>>>>>
>>>>> If I took that attitude, I never would have gotten anywhere at helping to
>>>>> expose the deceit of ACOEM and knocking out their "science" from
>>>>> guideline documents. This is a multi-complicated issue that I can't even
>>>>> think of two people who think exactly the same on everything with it.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/08/08, Deano wrote:
>>>>>> I attempted to reply several times, only to get the dreaded “forwarded
>>>>>> to site administrator for review” type message. I have no idea why.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In reply, the article lacked sound grammar, proof-reading and content
>>>>>> supported by factual references.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Beyond that, I have no idea of the point you were trying to make with
>>>>>> your tedious cut-n-paste.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/08/08, sick wrote:
>>>>>>> Deano,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wondering "why" there also wasn't a response from you to to my post
>>>>>> of 9/5/08?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/07/08, Deano wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 9/05/08, Sharon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTW, why no comment from you on the Leonard Lopate Show?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No time as of yet. I'll get around to it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>
Posts on this thread, including this one
- The Downey Toxic He ll Hole, 9/04/08, by Sharon.
- Re: The Downey Toxic He ll Hole, 9/04/08, by Deano.
- Re: The Downey Toxic He ll Hole, 9/05/08, by Sharon.
- Re: The Downey Toxic He ll Hole, 9/05/08, by Sharon.
- Re: The Downey Toxic He ll Hole, 9/05/08, by sick.
- Re: The Downey Toxic He ll Hole, 9/07/08, by Deano.
- Re: The Downey Toxic He ll Hole, 9/07/08, by Deano.
- Re: DEANO, 9/08/08, by sick.
- Re: DEANO, 9/08/08, by Deano.
- Re: DEANO, 9/08/08, by Sharon.
- Re: DEANO, 9/08/08, by sick.
- Re: DEANO, 9/09/08, by doubtful.
- Re: DEANO, 9/09/08, by Deano.
- Re: DEANO, 9/09/08, by Sharon.
- Re: DEANO, 9/09/08, by Deano.
- Re: DEANO, 9/09/08, by Sharon.
- Re: DEANO, 9/09/08, by Deano.
- Re: DEANO, 9/09/08, by sick.
|
1996 - 2007. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.