| |||||||||
Re: Appeal decision?
Posted by johncodie on 10/03/08
That means you can be a beatuy queen if you would like to come visit for a
day.
jc
On 9/30/08, Deborah wrote:
> Can anyone translate this for me?
>
>
> On 9/30/08, Deborah wrote:
>> On 9/30/08, johncodie wrote:
>>> On 9/23/08, Sharon wrote:
>>>> Fair enough. I will answer what I want and won't answer what I don't
>>>> want. Just try not to get too personal, please.
>>>
>>>
>>> Are you as beautiful as you alway were back in the Ole Miss and High
>>> School days? Oh, Sorry Sharon is that too personal? We have a tune
>> we
>>> Hum here that goes to the child hood song, "The song that never
>>> ends..." it just keeps going, going, and going. Sorry to hear the
>>> ruling. But don't get discouraged, the judicial system is like the
>>> gift that keeps on giving but one that no one really wanted anymore.
>>>
>>> To clear up confusion you have requested a summary judgement from the
>>> court/judge to review the complaint and evidence to see if the court
>>> would rule there was insufficient evidence, or basis of law for the
>>> trial to continue? A ruling on the known facts to date where a ruling
>>> could save the court valuable time and expense in denying the cause.
>>> Ie. a fravilous suit filed against you!
>>>
>>> I kind of know where your coming from, and perhaps the mental anquish
>>> in being stuck in the litigation quagmire for many months to come.
>> But
>>> some times peoples actions or inactions require the in the face, or on
>>> the side confrontation of disputed facts. It is just a matter of
>>> principles we live by, and a matter of law. Just hunker down, grab a
>>> romance novel, a bottle of caliornia bubbly and just lose yourself.
>>>
>>> You should know if you don't we are really rooting for your
>>> exhoneration. v/r jc
| You are on the BLACKMOLD CHATBOARD: LATEST POSTS ALL POSTS SUBMIT POST |
| ||||||||||
|
1996 - 2007. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.