ATTORNEYS  |  LAW STUDENTS  |  PUBLICchat center
Counsel.Net - ATTORNEYS - Attorneys Lawyers Attorney Law And Legal Professionals
Attorneys lawyers law firms
Latest Posts Full Chatboard Submit Post



Post: State Wades Into Oak Ridge Mold Mystery

Posted by Sharon on 6/27/09

    rhinonews.com greensboro
    Articles
    State Wades Into Oak Ridge Mold Mystery

    by Paul C. Clark
    Staff Writerwrite the author
    June 25, 2009
    The pressure on Guilford County Schools to solve the
    mystery of health symptoms reported by students and parents
    at Oak Ridge Elementary School is increasing.

    Students and parents at the school have reported persistent
    and increasingly severe symptoms at Oak Ridge since it was
    completely rebuilt in 2005.

    On June 15, the Occupational Safety and Health Division of
    the North Carolina Department of Labor (NCDOL) , which
    investigates complaints of hazardous workplace
    environments, wrote to Guilford County Schools with the
    first official complaint from Oak Ridge employees and
    parents, ordering the school system to investigate the
    conditions at Oak Ridge and report its finding to the NCDOL
    by June 24.

    The complaint released by the NCDOL said that employees at
    the school are exposed to mold inside the HVAC unit, walls
    and carpet of the school, and that employees are
    experiencing adverse health effects, including skin rashes,
    headaches, nosebleeds, fever, blurred vision, sore throats
    and fatigue.

    The NCDOL wrote to Oak Ridge Elementary School on June 15
    stating that the agency has not yet determined whether or
    not the hazards alleged in the complaint exist, and isn't
    conducting an independent investigation of the school at
    this time. But the agency ordered the school to conduct an
    investigation, and to correct any environmental hazards
    found.

    "Within seven working days of your receipt of this letter,
    please advise us, in writing, by certified mail of your
    findings and of the action you have taken," the NCDOL
    wrote. "Your response should be detailed, stating
    specifically what actions you have taken to correct each
    hazard. You should enclose any supporting documentation,
    such as monitoring results, equipment purchases,
    photographs, etc."

    The NCDOL also warned the school system not to retaliate
    against any employee involved in filing the claim, citing
    the North Carolina statute against such retaliation.

    The NCDOL wrote that the North Carolina Occupational Safety
    and Health Act allows it to issue citations and penalties
    to the school if the school system doesn't adequately
    respond and the NCDOL has to investigate the building
    itself.

    The NCDOL wrote, "If we do not receive a response from you
    within seven working days indicating that appropriate
    action has been taken, or that no hazard exists and why, an
    inspection may be conducted."

    The NCDOL's involvement is just the latest chapter in the
    Oak Ridge saga, which dates to the 2005 rebuilding of the
    school. In addition to the health symptoms, parents and
    teachers at the school have reported persistent water leaks
    in the building since then, and internal and third-party
    inspections began turning up mold in the floors, bathrooms
    and heating, ventilation and air-conditioning system of the
    school at least as early as 2007, the earliest date for
    which records are yet available.

    Some parents and teachers at the school accuse Guilford
    County Schools of inaction on Oak Ridge. Others say the
    school system has been responsive, but obviously has not
    yet found the cause of the problem, which, according to a
    survey of symptoms released by the Guilford County
    Department of Public Health on June 12, increased between
    the 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 school years.

    One toxicologist, Jack Thrasher, said Guilford County
    Schools hasn't done specific enough tests to identify any
    mold-related health risks at Oak Ridge.

    Thrasher is a California toxicologist who has reviewed some
    of the test results done over the past two years at Oak
    Ridge. Unlike Linda May, the self-proclaimed mold expert
    who has grabbed the spotlight in recent weeks in the Oak
    Ridge controversy, Thrasher provided a resume that lends
    credence to his opinions. He's a Ph.D., not a medical
    doctor, but his resume lists the things you'd expect to
    find in an environmental expert: a 1964 doctorate in human
    cellular biology from the University of California School
    of Medicine, professorships at the University of California
    School of Medicine and the University of Colorado School of
    Medicine, numerous publications in peer-reviewed journals
    on the medical effects of environmental hazards, bearing
    titles such as, "On the Neuropsychological and
    Electrocortical Impacts of Mixed Mold Exposure," and
    numerous memberships in scientific societies.

    We haven't verified all of the material on Thrasher's
    resume – news outlets rarely do, unless, as with May, there
    are reasons to doubt a person's qualifications – but we
    have no reason to doubt them. Like May, Thrasher works as a
    consultant on issues of mold and other environmental
    contaminants. Unlike May, Thrasher shows a precise
    knowledge of the peer-reviewed literature on mold, the
    chemical and biological tests for mold exposure, and the
    medical effects of exposure to mold and other contaminants.
    He may be right or wrong, but he's not speaking from
    ignorance.

    Thrasher reviewed some of the tests done by Workplace
    Hygiene, the industrial-hygiene firm hired by Guilford
    County Schools to test the air and carpets at Oak Ridge,
    and said he found them lacking. "Those were all standard
    testing, but it's incomplete testing," he said.

    Thrasher said that the tape-lift and air tests done at Oak
    Ridge are fine, but should be followed up with dust tests
    to measure the school on the US Environmental Protection
    Agency's "Environmental Relative Moldiness Index." Such DNA
    tests of mold found in dust identify 36 types of mold more
    precisely than air tests and tape lifts, and supporters of
    dust tests say they are more useful in diagnosing the
    danger level posed by mold in a building. Others say dust
    tests are useful, but don't correlate directly to known
    health symptoms – and that positive results on the dust
    test show a need for more investigation, rather than
    proving a causal effect by the mold on reported health
    symptoms.

    Thrasher reviewed the vacuum-sample tests and tape lifts
    done on carpets at Oak Ridge and said they were probably
    valid.

    "That would indicate to me that there is very little mold
    being held by the carpets, and I see nothing wrong with
    that," Thrasher said. "But what I'm concerned about is
    what's in the HVAC system."

    Thrasher said that, in addition to the dust tests, Guilford
    County Schools should do bulk tests on any mold-
    contaminated building materials found at Oak Ridge. In
    other words, if the school system finds a mold-contaminated
    section of wall board, it should do DNA testing on that
    part of the wall.

    Thrasher also suggested that the school system do a gas
    chromatographic mass spectrometer test for microtoxins on
    samples taken at the school, using even more specialized
    high pressure/performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). He
    said, "It's a complex test which can be done, but which
    they appear not to have done."

    Thrasher said that dust tests are more reliable than tests
    for mold spores, such as Guilford County Schools has had
    done, because specialists have demonstrated in studies that
    mold-related microtoxins are found in fine particulate
    matter, not just in spores – and that contaminated dust can
    enter the alveoli of human lungs and thus enter the
    bloodstream.

    May is trying to sell parents and teachers at Oak Ridge DNA
    tests for human urine. Thrasher said that DNA tests on
    human tissue, or on mold-contaminated materials, are valid –
    but that he doesn't consider the type of test May
    describes valid.

    "I doubt very much that you're going to find mold DNA in
    the urine, unless there's severe kidney infection," he
    said. "The woman doesn't know what she's talking about."

    Thrasher said that a test for T-2 microtoxin – a microtoxin
    found in molds and, in a highly purified form, used as a
    weapon – has been developed, but by Dr. Dennis Hooper of
    RealTime Laboratories of Dallas. He said that test has not
    yet been approved for use in humans.

    Brian Kareis, an industrial hygienist with Workplace
    Hygiene, agreed with most of Thrasher's assessments, and
    welcomed his input on future tests at the school.

    "Most of the typical things have been done," Kareis
    said. "You can test and test and test, but unless you have
    a direction, you're kind of at a loss. I'm certainly
    willing to listen to an outside expert."

    Kareis said that most of what he's read indicates that
    microtoxins stay in mold spores and shouldn't be found in
    loose particles. He said the samples taken so far have been
    run through a mass spectrometer, but not using the newer
    HPLC method, or testing for DNA sequences. He said that the
    DNA tests are expensive, and tend to err on the side of
    generating positive findings that may not actually be
    causing health problems.

    Kareis said many of the connections claimed between mold
    and health problems have not yet been proven, and that
    federal and state regulations have not yet caught up with
    the mold health debate by establishing standards.

    "There's no regulatory basis for any of this," he
    said. "And a lot of it comes down to individual
    susceptibility. It's tricky to interpret that type of
    stuff, unless you have a huge amount of a particular type
    of mold."

    Kareis said he hadn't heard that DNA tests are available
    for mold samples taken from HVAC systems. "I'll look into
    that," he said. "That's a good idea."

    Documents released by Guilford County Schools this week
    show that the school system had Oak Ridge inspected or
    tested 13 times for environmental issues between October
    2007 and June 2009.

    The documents show that remediation work was done at the
    school by outside contractors four times during that
    period: in July and August 2008, when Triad Engineering and
    Lomax Construction installed a $534,000 dehumidification
    system at the school; in February 2009, when an outside
    contractor installed a $5,597 variable frequency drive to
    increase the amount of outside air coming into air
    handlers; in April 2009, when Right Touch Interiors removed
    carpets and replaced them with tile for $990; in May 2009,
    when Get Right Interiors did another two rounds of carpet
    replacement for $11,000.

    Here's a partial timeline of the development of the Oak
    Ridge environmental problems, going back to 2007. Guilford
    County Schools officials said they are gathering documents
    on any earlier reports of air-quality problems, tests or
    remediation before then:

    The new Oak Ridge Elementary opened in August 2005. Parents
    and teachers have said that they reported water leaks and
    moldy smells at the school beginning soon after the opening.

    After reports of indoor air quality problems, Guilford
    County Schools on Oct. 25, 2007, took air samples and tape-
    lift samples from carpets in a classroom, at a cost of
    $780. The tests indicated slightly elevated mold-spore
    counts. Guilford County Schools hired Kareis of Workplace
    Hygiene to do additional tests for carbon dioxide and mold,
    looking particularly at the air handlers and vacuum pump in
    the HVAC system, at a cost of $2,101.

    The Workplace Hygiene tests found microbial growth in four
    air handlers, and the school system hired All Kleen to
    clean the air handlers, at a cost of $3,507.

    In July and August 2008, the dehumidification system was
    installed.

    On Oct. 20, 2008, tape-lift samples found microbial growth
    in three air handlers. All Kleen cleaned the air handlers
    at a cost of $6,500.

Posts on this thread, including this one

  • State Wades Into Oak Ridge Mold Mystery, 6/27/09, by Sharon.
  • Re: State Wades Into Oak Ridge Mold Mystery, 6/27/09, by sharon.
  • Re: State Wades Into Oak Ridge Mold Mystery, 6/28/09, by Deano.
  • Re: State Wades Into Oak Ridge Mold Mystery, 6/28/09, by Sharon.
  • Re: State Wades Into Oak Ridge Mold Mystery, 6/28/09, by Deano.
  • Re: State Wades Into Oak Ridge Mold Mystery, 6/28/09, by Sharon.
  • Re: State Wades Into Oak Ridge Mold Mystery, 6/29/09, by Deano.
  • Re: State Wades Into Oak Ridge Mold Mystery, 6/29/09, by Sharon.
  • Re: State Wades Into Oak Ridge Mold Mystery, 6/29/09, by Jack Dwayne Thrasher, Ph.D.
  • Re: State Wades Into Oak Ridge Mold Mystery, 6/29/09, by Sharon.
  • Re: State Wades Into Oak Ridge Mold Mystery, 6/29/09, by Jack Dwayne Thrasher, Ph.D.
  • Re: State Wades Into Oak Ridge Mold Mystery, 6/29/09, by sharon.


    •  
    You are on the BLACKMOLD CHATBOARD:   LATEST POSTS   ALL POSTS   SUBMIT POST


    Sponsored Links  

    Free Legal Classifieds: Buy and sell anything law-related - never a cost to post or browse
    counsel.net/classifieds

    Legal Jobs: Attorneys and legal professionals - find your perfect legal job from Counsel.Net
    counsel.net/jobs

    Attorney Directory: Find a lawyer or chat with an attorney - Free!
    counsel.net

    New Moms Wanted!
    Join the community for new and expecting moms. Check out Maternityville.com Maternity Chat!

    Other Chatboards in this Category...
    Toxic Torts Chatboards
    ToxBoard (Gen)
    Asbestos
    Black Mold
    Building Materials
    Class Actions
    Fen-Phen
    EPA/CDC/NIH
    Food Additives
    Legal Experts
    Medical Implants
    Fiberglass
    Government Claims
    Gulf War Syndrome
    MCS/MCSS
    Pharmaceuticals
    Herbal Supplements
    Tobacco Claims
    Workplace Exposures

     
        Google
         
        Web Toxlaw.com

      Site Map: Home Search Contacts Chatboards Mailrings Jobs Legal Tools Advertise
      © 1996 - 2007. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.