Re: Kelman v Kramer ruling 12.29.09
Posted by Deborah on 1/06/10
On 1/06/10, johncodie wrote:
> On 1/06/10, Deborah wrote:
>> so, you would have no problem with your name being used prominently to market
>> a product for the purpose of generating a profit even if you were unaware of
>> it and thus without having authorized its use, especially if the product was
>> of little merit and may very well cause harm by it promoting false and/or
>> seriously flawed information?
> I believe it has been proven, at least confirmed that Ms Kramer had a prior
> legal disagreement with Kelman and made the decision to make that known in
> public as to cause some type damage to Mr. Kelman. Either it to make up for the
> losses she incurred as a result, or for the emotional benefits of retribution.
> The facts of the case have been sketchy but the time involved in the history
> appears to be from eight to ten years.
> Why would I have a problem with my name being used, it is not trade marked and
> most reputable establishment has one designated for either of the
> sexes. "John". Mr Saxon was a member of an association and had entered into
> some agreements of peer review. Mrs Obama just got her picture on the side of
> busses for not wearing furs. The White House might not be happy about it, but
> she is a public figure, and has previously expressed her opinion.
> Mr Saxon is a public figure and was involved in writting a paper for a group.
> He had knowledge, and associations. Did he or has he written a paper that
> totaly disagrees with what was published. Where is his paper? He stated that
> the laymans terms paper was published with his name on it. That may be true,
> that might be false. Was Mr Saxon ever involed in the Globaltox firm? It is a
> matter of record they were employed on a common paper.
> With ever emerging tort reform, I would not place much of any faith in a laymens
> term position paper. Much of all LCD televisions made today are made in china,
> and are disposable with no repair parts made. Love those extended warranties
> for labor and repair without repair parts made. This has come to the bare
> minimum insurance companies pays, and health care reform that has not been
> defined as to the metrics of equality of care.
> Sure Kramer had a beef with Kelman in extrapolating animal data to say her
> daughters near death due to mycotoxins in their home was'nt supported by the
> medical community. But that does not provide the data to the contray. The
> accusation of misconduct of Mr. Kelman by Ms Kramer as to perjury has not been
> substantiated by the judicial system. I don't see any court entertaining any
> malfesence correction that has gone this long.
> One of our Supreme Court Justices approached the Legislature with the following
> quote "Justice Delayed, Justice Denied". One of our most notable civil right
> judges begin 18 months in Kentucky prison for lying to the FBI concerning one
> lie. It was a lie about a conversation and association.
> I see from Ms Kramers recent posting some decline. It shows the lack of rest
> and continue persuit of trival matters. More dribble or grammer correction. If
> the justice department can't get the Emit Teel murder back into trail what would
> warrant misuse of a prior contributor on a laymens paper on effects of
Posts on this thread, including this one