Follow us!

    Re: Kelman v Kramer ruling 12.29.09

    Posted by Deborah on 1/06/10

    On 1/06/10, johncodie wrote:
    > On 1/06/10, Deborah wrote:
    >> so, you would have no problem with your name being used prominently to market
    >> a product for the purpose of generating a profit even if you were unaware of
    >> it and thus without having authorized its use, especially if the product was
    >> of little merit and may very well cause harm by it promoting false and/or
    >> seriously flawed information?
    > I believe it has been proven, at least confirmed that Ms Kramer had a prior
    > legal disagreement with Kelman and made the decision to make that known in
    > public as to cause some type damage to Mr. Kelman. Either it to make up for the
    > losses she incurred as a result, or for the emotional benefits of retribution.
    > The facts of the case have been sketchy but the time involved in the history
    > appears to be from eight to ten years.
    > Why would I have a problem with my name being used, it is not trade marked and
    > most reputable establishment has one designated for either of the
    > sexes. "John". Mr Saxon was a member of an association and had entered into
    > some agreements of peer review. Mrs Obama just got her picture on the side of
    > busses for not wearing furs. The White House might not be happy about it, but
    > she is a public figure, and has previously expressed her opinion.
    > Mr Saxon is a public figure and was involved in writting a paper for a group.
    > He had knowledge, and associations. Did he or has he written a paper that
    > totaly disagrees with what was published. Where is his paper? He stated that
    > the laymans terms paper was published with his name on it. That may be true,
    > that might be false. Was Mr Saxon ever involed in the Globaltox firm? It is a
    > matter of record they were employed on a common paper.
    > With ever emerging tort reform, I would not place much of any faith in a laymens
    > term position paper. Much of all LCD televisions made today are made in china,
    > and are disposable with no repair parts made. Love those extended warranties
    > for labor and repair without repair parts made. This has come to the bare
    > minimum insurance companies pays, and health care reform that has not been
    > defined as to the metrics of equality of care.
    > Sure Kramer had a beef with Kelman in extrapolating animal data to say her
    > daughters near death due to mycotoxins in their home was'nt supported by the
    > medical community. But that does not provide the data to the contray. The
    > accusation of misconduct of Mr. Kelman by Ms Kramer as to perjury has not been
    > substantiated by the judicial system. I don't see any court entertaining any
    > malfesence correction that has gone this long.
    > One of our Supreme Court Justices approached the Legislature with the following
    > quote "Justice Delayed, Justice Denied". One of our most notable civil right
    > judges begin 18 months in Kentucky prison for lying to the FBI concerning one
    > lie. It was a lie about a conversation and association.
    > I see from Ms Kramers recent posting some decline. It shows the lack of rest
    > and continue persuit of trival matters. More dribble or grammer correction. If
    > the justice department can't get the Emit Teel murder back into trail what would
    > warrant misuse of a prior contributor on a laymens paper on effects of
    > mycotoxins?

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.