Follow us!

    Re: Kelman v Kramer ruling 12.29.09

    Posted by Deborah on 1/06/10

    Speculation, assumption, and innuendo..

    I would like to hear what Dr. Saxon has to say about it.

    If I contract with you for a specific job, paper, etc.., I would take issue if you
    were to affiliate my name, as in co-author, to another paper even if it were a
    purported "lay translation"; in other words, if the paper were to be translated, even
    if to another language, I would want to have final authorization for use of my name
    upon it even if it meant hiring a credible language specialist. A "good name" for
    business is a highly valuable commodity.

    On 1/06/10, Deborah wrote:
    > On 1/06/10, johncodie wrote:
    >> On 1/06/10, Deborah wrote:
    >>> so, you would have no problem with your name being used prominently to market
    >>> a product for the purpose of generating a profit even if you were unaware of
    >>> it and thus without having authorized its use, especially if the product was
    >>> of little merit and may very well cause harm by it promoting false and/or
    >>> seriously flawed information?
    >> I believe it has been proven, at least confirmed that Ms Kramer had a prior
    >> legal disagreement with Kelman and made the decision to make that known in
    >> public as to cause some type damage to Mr. Kelman. Either it to make up for the
    >> losses she incurred as a result, or for the emotional benefits of retribution.
    >> The facts of the case have been sketchy but the time involved in the history
    >> appears to be from eight to ten years.
    >> Why would I have a problem with my name being used, it is not trade marked and
    >> most reputable establishment has one designated for either of the
    >> sexes. "John". Mr Saxon was a member of an association and had entered into
    >> some agreements of peer review. Mrs Obama just got her picture on the side of
    >> busses for not wearing furs. The White House might not be happy about it, but
    >> she is a public figure, and has previously expressed her opinion.
    >> Mr Saxon is a public figure and was involved in writting a paper for a group.
    >> He had knowledge, and associations. Did he or has he written a paper that
    >> totaly disagrees with what was published. Where is his paper? He stated that
    >> the laymans terms paper was published with his name on it. That may be true,
    >> that might be false. Was Mr Saxon ever involed in the Globaltox firm? It is a
    >> matter of record they were employed on a common paper.
    >> With ever emerging tort reform, I would not place much of any faith in a laymens
    >> term position paper. Much of all LCD televisions made today are made in china,
    >> and are disposable with no repair parts made. Love those extended warranties
    >> for labor and repair without repair parts made. This has come to the bare
    >> minimum insurance companies pays, and health care reform that has not been
    >> defined as to the metrics of equality of care.
    >> Sure Kramer had a beef with Kelman in extrapolating animal data to say her
    >> daughters near death due to mycotoxins in their home was'nt supported by the
    >> medical community. But that does not provide the data to the contray. The
    >> accusation of misconduct of Mr. Kelman by Ms Kramer as to perjury has not been
    >> substantiated by the judicial system. I don't see any court entertaining any
    >> malfesence correction that has gone this long.
    >> One of our Supreme Court Justices approached the Legislature with the following
    >> quote "Justice Delayed, Justice Denied". One of our most notable civil right
    >> judges begin 18 months in Kentucky prison for lying to the FBI concerning one
    >> lie. It was a lie about a conversation and association.
    >> I see from Ms Kramers recent posting some decline. It shows the lack of rest
    >> and continue persuit of trival matters. More dribble or grammer correction. If
    >> the justice department can't get the Emit Teel murder back into trail what would
    >> warrant misuse of a prior contributor on a laymens paper on effects of
    >> mycotoxins?

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.