Re: Kelman v Kramer ruling 12.29.09
Posted by johncodie on 1/08/10
On 1/08/10, Sharon wrote:
> Well, you were getting close, but now you are cold again. I most likely cannot
> respond to you anymore til Sunday. So you have two whole days to bash away,
> completely unbridled.
> Hotty Toddy, Have a nice weekend.
Just keep that Hotty Toddy attitude going. We all know how the Ole Miss Southern Bells are far superior
that the Ivy League scholars. I'm only cold because there is a 20 degree windstrom blowing through. I
won't be spending the time this weekend. It not my name, my reputation, my money, or my appeal on the
back burner. When we received our settlment we took our attony's wise advise to not bring the malice with
us to the new neighborhoods from all that worked against us reign. Many of the top players in State
Judicials are at prison or on their way. And the children have moved on to those Ivy League campuses
which you wish to have the supporting evidence that would prove your claims "correct". It's only noon and
you have time to play. You must be depending upon your media agents to show up at the appeal as
improperly pepared as you were the first time.
When you making your next documentary? I think when ballons boys mom and dad finish doing their time they
could be extras in your "How mold toxins" clouded my judgement and is the reason the son was mistaken for
a ride. Maybe a cult reunion to ride the next comet. I know people in California, not everone there is
fruit cakes and nuts. Stop giving the San Deigo wealthy a bad view of themselves.
Posts on this thread, including this one