Re: Kelman v Kramer ruling 12.29.09

More | Report Post

On 1/08/10, Sharon wrote:
> Oh, okay. Now I get it.
>
> You are a self professed loser who thinks any of these poor people who have been injured by mold should not
> attempt to fight for their rights and you believe that you are helping them by telling them they are a hopeless
> lot who should just accept their position in life and not get upity. Never mind that alot of these people would
> not even have sick children or be broke IF someone had made them aware that poor indoor air quality can severely
> adversely impact one's life.
>
> Okay, now I get it. You have lost all hope in your life, but need to control something and as such, think it is
> your responsibility to deem that all others are obligated to do the same.
>
> I must have missed your answer. Tell me again, if you are so over this issue then why are you still here
posting
> daily?
>
> Sharon
>

Anything but a loser, but I work with kin folk in a plant, not far from where you were raised. We commute and
have a viable business supporting the defense industry. I pass those less fortunate that either walk, or catch
the metro bus that are also gain fully employed. Perhaps I would be better off without the commute and would
prefer using the metro. What you have missed is wealth, or being poor has little to do with common sense. The
abiltiy to think clearly the intentions of others, or continued outcome. Being upity is an state of mind having
reflection on ones intelligence. I wouldn't class people I am, came from, and family to are "these people". You
over emphasis indoor air quality as the reason an individual is homeless, or the source of their childrens illness.

I am not the individual that appears to have prematurly aged 20 years, and have had such a drastic change in my
appearnce. I have no intentions of controlling you. Your totally lost in a dozen banker's boxes of legal papers
your trying to arrange for your attorny to lower the cost of next round of litigation. Your plane your waiting
for is your next smoke break outside. I want the individual that think they have a good chance of breaking even
in litigation over toxic mold air to go outside and take a few breaths to clear the head; and make interior home
changes to improve upon their health.

Your group is tainted in validity, and don't have any supporting data. You would have won hands down with the
jury if you had any credible evidence of having a winning team. What you have not come to terms with is you lost
by a large majority.