Re: Kelman v Kramer ruling 12.29.09
Posted by Mike B. on 1/08/10
Did someone call Sharon a "cyberstalker"? I always thought she suffered from transference.
On 1/08/10, johncodie wrote:
> On 1/08/10, Sharon wrote:
>> Oh, okay. Now I get it.
>> You are a self professed loser who thinks any of these poor people who have been injured by mold should not
>> attempt to fight for their rights and you believe that you are helping them by telling them they are a hopeless
>> lot who should just accept their position in life and not get upity. Never mind that alot of these people would
>> not even have sick children or be broke IF someone had made them aware that poor indoor air quality can severely
>> adversely impact one's life.
>> Okay, now I get it. You have lost all hope in your life, but need to control something and as such, think it is
>> your responsibility to deem that all others are obligated to do the same.
>> I must have missed your answer. Tell me again, if you are so over this issue then why are you still here
> Anything but a loser, but I work with kin folk in a plant, not far from where you were raised. We commute and
> have a viable business supporting the defense industry. I pass those less fortunate that either walk, or catch
> the metro bus that are also gain fully employed. Perhaps I would be better off without the commute and would
> prefer using the metro. What you have missed is wealth, or being poor has little to do with common sense. The
> abiltiy to think clearly the intentions of others, or continued outcome. Being upity is an state of mind having
> reflection on ones intelligence. I wouldn't class people I am, came from, and family to are "these people". You
> over emphasis indoor air quality as the reason an individual is homeless, or the source of their childrens illness.
> I am not the individual that appears to have prematurly aged 20 years, and have had such a drastic change in my
> appearnce. I have no intentions of controlling you. Your totally lost in a dozen banker's boxes of legal papers
> your trying to arrange for your attorny to lower the cost of next round of litigation. Your plane your waiting
> for is your next smoke break outside. I want the individual that think they have a good chance of breaking even
> in litigation over toxic mold air to go outside and take a few breaths to clear the head; and make interior home
> changes to improve upon their health.
> Your group is tainted in validity, and don't have any supporting data. You would have won hands down with the
> jury if you had any credible evidence of having a winning team. What you have not come to terms with is you lost
> by a large majority.
Posts on this thread, including this one