Re: Kelman v Kramer ruling 12.29.09

More | Report Post

Anybody who knows what they're talking about already knows that "environmental justice" is

On 1/11/10, Sharon wrote:
> JC,
>
> You write, "I want the individual that think they have a good chance of breaking even
> in litigation over toxic mold air to go outside and take a few breaths to clear the head; and make interior home
> changes to improve upon their health."
>
> Like I said, self professed loser who thinks it is his obligation to direct others to be the same. I don't know what
> country you live it, but I live in the United States of America. If people are injured by willful negligence of
> another then they are entitled to restitution. And IF they get restitution, then those who are negligent will think
> twice before they do it again, staving off unnecessary injury to others. The issue is not mold. It is the growing of
> environmental justice - an area of litigation that is in its infancy, and must be properly nurtured in the name of
> public health.
>
>
> What gives you the right to hold yourself out as omnipitent that others must agree to be losers, too, just like you?
>
> You did not answer my question: If you are so over this issue, then why are you still here posting to this board?
>
> Face it, John. A main theme in your posts has always been and continues to be that you do not like upity old
> sorority girls from Ole Miss. Fiddle de de. It is irrelevant in my life what you do and so..I am not even going to
> bother to think about it another day.
>
>
>
> Sharon
>
>
>
> On 1/08/10, johncodie wrote:
>> On 1/08/10, Sharon wrote:
>>> Oh, okay. Now I get it.
>>>
>>> You are a self professed loser who thinks any of these poor people who have been injured by mold should not
>>> attempt to fight for their rights and you believe that you are helping them by telling them they are a hopeless
>>> lot who should just accept their position in life and not get upity. Never mind that alot of these people would
>>> not even have sick children or be broke IF someone had made them aware that poor indoor air quality can severely
>>> adversely impact one's life.
>>>
>>> Okay, now I get it. You have lost all hope in your life, but need to control something and as such, think it is
>>> your responsibility to deem that all others are obligated to do the same.
>>>
>>> I must have missed your answer. Tell me again, if you are so over this issue then why are you still here
>> posting
>>> daily?
>>>
>>> Sharon
>>>
>>
>> Anything but a loser, but I work with kin folk in a plant, not far from where you were raised. We commute and
>> have a viable business supporting the defense industry. I pass those less fortunate that either walk, or catch
>> the metro bus that are also gain fully employed. Perhaps I would be better off without the commute and would
>> prefer using the metro. What you have missed is wealth, or being poor has little to do with common sense. The
>> abiltiy to think clearly the intentions of others, or continued outcome. Being upity is an state of mind having
>> reflection on ones intelligence. I wouldn't class people I am, came from, and family to are "these people". You
>> over emphasis indoor air quality as the reason an individual is homeless, or the source of their childrens illness.
>>
>> I am not the individual that appears to have prematurly aged 20 years, and have had such a drastic change in my
>> appearnce. I have no intentions of controlling you. Your totally lost in a dozen banker's boxes of legal papers
>> your trying to arrange for your attorny to lower the cost of next round of litigation. Your plane your waiting
>> for is your next smoke break outside. I want the individual that think they have a good chance of breaking even
>> in litigation over toxic mold air to go outside and take a few breaths to clear the head; and make interior home
>> changes to improve upon their health.
>>
>> Your group is tainted in validity, and don't have any supporting data. You would have won hands down with the
>> jury if you had any credible evidence of having a winning team. What you have not come to terms with is you lost
>> by a large majority.