Re: Kelman v Kramer ruling 12.29.09

More | Report Post

The average citizen has a considerable disadvantage going into litigation, even with a competent attorney. Takes big
bucks to litigate even the most cut and dried case of right v wrong.

On 1/11/10, Johncodie wrote:
> Sharon:
>
> Like most native americans taken advantage of during the Andrew Jackson era, I am a gather as opposed to your tribe
> which is the warrior. I pick up useful information where I can find it and continue the tribal ways. You contiue on
> the war path with painted war paint, or atleast lipstick. In response to your comments noted in "response". You
> entered into littigation battle and now that the blood has spilled in the first defeat the sharks are approaching for
> the continued battle to be scheduled with the clerk. You can't stop thinking about it you won't let the appeal go.
>
> On 1/11/10, Sharon wrote:
>> JC,
>>
>> You write, "I want the individual that think they have a good chance of breaking even
>> in litigation over toxic mold air to go outside and take a few breaths to clear the head; and make interior home
>> changes to improve upon their health."
>>
>> Like I said, self professed loser who thinks it is his obligation to direct others to be the same.
>
> Attack of words
>
> I don't know what
>> country you live it, but I live in the United States of America.
>
> This doesn't warrant a response.
>
> If people are injured by willful negligence of
>> another then they are entitled to restitution.
>
> So why don't you honor the court findings and make restitution.
>
>
> And IF they get restitution, then those who are negligent will think
>> twice before they do it again, staving off unnecessary injury to others.
>
> The money being paid to those on Wall Street show how out of touch you are about the negligent investors and the
> taxpayers having to file the taxes this year. As per your example of non-admission of wrong there is hardly ever
> restituion made.
>
> The issue is not mold. It is the growing of
>> environmental justice - an area of litigation that is in its infancy, and must be properly nurtured in the name of
>> public health.
>
> I know of a few environmental courts, and the building inspectors that tried to have the local municipilites to
> include semi-annual inspection of homes were swiftly defeated by the State Realtor's board. It would require all
> house holds to be subject to inspection either owned or rented. Public Health is the Health Department with
> jurisdictions and laws. We have clean air, clean water federal laws. Wow a new specialty of study, law and
> engineering? Environmental Justice !!!
>
>>
>>
>> What gives you the right to hold yourself out as omnipitent that others must agree to be losers, too, just like you?
>
> Because I have as many or more hours of remediation of a dwelling with some of the national self proclaimed
> environmental justice experts; a settlement placing my family in a warm dry home, family in the insurance department,
> children already demonstating the initiative to be a part of the solution, rather waiting on a final payout. An
> understanding of those who might be classified by society as loosers, but do have enough common sense to support
> themselves rather the join an internet warrior advocacy group.
>
>>
>> You did not answer my question: If you are so over this issue, then why are you still here posting to this board?
>
> Because there are mold warriors like yourself that keep beating the war drums of "If we have enough signatures on a
> petition and you send me enough money to my cause I an reverse a jury of 12 of the findings I am a vicious war
> warrior".
>>
>> Face it, John. A main theme in your posts has always been and continues to be that you do not like upity old
>> sorority girls from Ole Miss.
>
> I did marry a graduate of one of the professional schools there but she was from another state university sorority. I
> guess she didn't have enough time for the silly meetings the gals of Ole Miss were soliciting.
>
> Fiddle de de.
>
> Hunky Dorie
>
> It is irrelevant in my life what you do and so..I am not even going to
>> bother to think about it another day.
>
> Thats what you said Friday!
>
>
> Why are you trying to now claim "attorny client priv" when your attorny provided the damning e-mail of the plantiff?
> Your appeal that has to be much more expensive makes no sense. Does this become a new law under the enviromental
> justice?
>
> jc