Follow us!

    Re: Kelman v Kramer ruling 12.29.09

    Posted by johncoide on 1/20/10

    Don't hate anything; but have had twelve years in monitoring. Interesting our law suits
    were running very close to the same time line. Our settlement amount was agreed to be
    kept confidential, and did pay for the tort of insurance "bad faith" for almost six years.
    It was about three times the damages of the face value of the policy. It won't help if I
    give you the answers, as you need to find the foundations to our democratic free speech.
    As I read what you just put out here, your torn and relive all of your trial and show your
    anger. Its a lesson for all of us, get it out there. I take some of my rage on a
    defenseless golf ball. The tort the court has shown is in your game of frustrations of
    golf as example is you have teed your ball behind Mr. Kelman and striking the ball toward
    him before he has had a chance to "clarify" or complete his hole. Hitting as to hurt Mr.
    Kelman has you removed from continued participation. If you can't answer simple
    historical questions of law, you have no respect for it, and are indulging yourself in a
    continued time warp. I can't even remember the insurance companies experts, No I don't
    dwell on it. But here you are embroiled in it. Can you just turn this over to your
    attorney and show up? I think it would be better for life persuit of happiness that you
    don't appear to have any interest in.

    Below is criminal perjury in a libel litigation to establish a false theme for/reason
    for personal malice while strategically litigating against public participation to
    silence the fact that "ya can't take a rat study, add some math and then have the US
    Chamber of Commerce et al, mass market to the courts that science holds all claims of
    illness are a result of trial lawyers, media and Junk Science.

    “I first learned of Defendant Sharon Kramer in mid-2003, when
    I was retained as an expert in a lawsuit between her, her
    homeowner’s insure and other parties regarding alleged mold
    contamination in her house. She apparently felt that the
    remediation work had been inadequately done, and that she and
    her daughter had suffered life-threatening diseases as a result. I
    testified that the type and amount of mold in the Kramer house
    could not have caused the life-threatening illnesses that she claimed."

    The evidence is irrefutable. Bruce Kelman’s and VeriTox’s “legal” counsel, Keith
    Scheuer, willfully and repeatedly suborned Bruce Kelman’s criminal perjury and
    willfully benefited from improvidently entered orders of the courts, when defeating all
    motions from 2005 to 2009 (and most likely will try again in 2010 with his reply to
    this query). All courts, whose work this Court is reviewing, turned a blind eye to the
    matter no matter how much evidence they were provided that proved Bruce Kelman is liar
    who made up a reason for Sharon Kramer to harbor personal malice for him because
    establishing reason for malice is necessary in libel law.

    Keith Scheuer has willfully misled and “Eddie Haskled” the courts for five years in
    violation of his duties as a licensed officer of the California courts. Keith Scheuer,
    August 18, 2008, to the Honorable Judge Lisa C. Schall:

    Gee, Mrs. Cleaver...“Thank you. Rhymes with lawyer, by the way for ease. Your honor,
    umm, without just being grossly brown-nosing here, I’ve been in this case for three and
    a half years. You’ve been in it for about two hours, and I think you have grasped what
    this case is about. I think this is a really simply, really straightforward case. I
    think we can do this in about two days of testimony. It needs to be limited, I think,
    just as you suggested. We don’t have any intention of –first, of going into the science
    that lies behind the ACOEM Statement or any of these other statements. It is
    unnecessary.” (Vol.1 RT 34-35)

    This is willful suborning of criminal perjury by Keith Scheuer, as submitted to the
    courts on September 17, 2005 (Vol.I App.34) and May 7, 2006 (Vol.I App.238)

    “Dr. Kelman testified in a deposition that the type and amount
    of mold in the Kramer house could not have caused the life
    threatening illnesses that Kramer claimed. Apparently furious
    that the science conflicted with her dreams of a remodeled
    house, Kramer launched an obsessive campaign to destroy the
    reputation of Dr. Kelman and GlobalTox.”

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.