Re: Kelman v Kramer ruling 12.29.09

More | Report Post

Don't hate anything; but have had twelve years in monitoring. Interesting our law suits
were running very close to the same time line. Our settlement amount was agreed to be
kept confidential, and did pay for the tort of insurance "bad faith" for almost six years.
It was about three times the damages of the face value of the policy. It won't help if I
give you the answers, as you need to find the foundations to our democratic free speech.
As I read what you just put out here, your torn and relive all of your trial and show your
anger. Its a lesson for all of us, get it out there. I take some of my rage on a
defenseless golf ball. The tort the court has shown is in your game of frustrations of
golf as example is you have teed your ball behind Mr. Kelman and striking the ball toward
him before he has had a chance to "clarify" or complete his hole. Hitting as to hurt Mr.
Kelman has you removed from continued participation. If you can't answer simple
historical questions of law, you have no respect for it, and are indulging yourself in a
continued time warp. I can't even remember the insurance companies experts, No I don't
dwell on it. But here you are embroiled in it. Can you just turn this over to your
attorney and show up? I think it would be better for life persuit of happiness that you
don't appear to have any interest in.

Below is criminal perjury in a libel litigation to establish a false theme for/reason
for personal malice while strategically litigating against public participation to
silence the fact that "ya can't take a rat study, add some math and then have the US
Chamber of Commerce et al, mass market to the courts that science holds all claims of
illness are a result of trial lawyers, media and Junk Science.

“I first learned of Defendant Sharon Kramer in mid-2003, when
I was retained as an expert in a lawsuit between her, her
homeowner’s insure and other parties regarding alleged mold
contamination in her house. She apparently felt that the
remediation work had been inadequately done, and that she and
her daughter had suffered life-threatening diseases as a result. I
testified that the type and amount of mold in the Kramer house
could not have caused the life-threatening illnesses that she claimed."

The evidence is irrefutable. Bruce Kelman’s and VeriTox’s “legal” counsel, Keith
Scheuer, willfully and repeatedly suborned Bruce Kelman’s criminal perjury and
willfully benefited from improvidently entered orders of the courts, when defeating all
motions from 2005 to 2009 (and most likely will try again in 2010 with his reply to
this query). All courts, whose work this Court is reviewing, turned a blind eye to the
matter no matter how much evidence they were provided that proved Bruce Kelman is liar
who made up a reason for Sharon Kramer to harbor personal malice for him because
establishing reason for malice is necessary in libel law.

Keith Scheuer has willfully misled and “Eddie Haskled” the courts for five years in
violation of his duties as a licensed officer of the California courts. Keith Scheuer,
August 18, 2008, to the Honorable Judge Lisa C. Schall:

Gee, Mrs. Cleaver...“Thank you. Rhymes with lawyer, by the way for ease. Your honor,
umm, without just being grossly brown-nosing here, I’ve been in this case for three and
a half years. You’ve been in it for about two hours, and I think you have grasped what
this case is about. I think this is a really simply, really straightforward case. I
think we can do this in about two days of testimony. It needs to be limited, I think,
just as you suggested. We don’t have any intention of –first, of going into the science
that lies behind the ACOEM Statement or any of these other statements. It is
unnecessary.” (Vol.1 RT 34-35)

This is willful suborning of criminal perjury by Keith Scheuer, as submitted to the
courts on September 17, 2005 (Vol.I App.34) and May 7, 2006 (Vol.I App.238)

“Dr. Kelman testified in a deposition that the type and amount
of mold in the Kramer house could not have caused the life
threatening illnesses that Kramer claimed. Apparently furious
that the science conflicted with her dreams of a remodeled
house, Kramer launched an obsessive campaign to destroy the
reputation of Dr. Kelman and GlobalTox.”