Re: Kelman v Kramer ruling 12.29.09

More | Report Post

On 1/20/10, Sharon wrote:
> JC,
>
> You really are goofy and somewhat dense. While you don't get it, I am aware many do as
> these posts came up on a google alert yesterday meaning alot of people are reading this.
>
> Deano, explain the big picture to him, please. lol
>
> Sharon
>
>
You must be confused with your high school youth friend. I am neither goofy or dense and
have been working in a highly technical, intuitive, field for years. I'm sure plenty of
people are reading this as you enjoy reaping the public bias perception; I get to extract a
little bit more of clarifying information about your mind set, and your progress. I don't
need the big picture or the straight skinny. I don't even have to inquire about your next
trip to Washington D.C. or any other major mold warrior event. I belive you have provided
enough information for people to decide if they would like for you to continue to represent
their case.

I do get the defense strategy, I just don't buy into what you are going to provide to the
courts will remand the ruling back to court for a retrial, or overturn the jury decision.
Your so focused on the scales of justice tilting from one side based upon liable words to the
other side for perjury. The courts just don't work that way. There is way too much
extraneous words and emotions in your presentation and not fully packed with facts. Alot of
fluff.