Follow us!

    Re: Kelman v Kramer ruling 12.29.09

    Posted by johncodie on 1/20/10

    On 1/20/10, Sharon wrote:
    > JC,
    > You really are goofy and somewhat dense. While you don't get it, I am aware many do as
    > these posts came up on a google alert yesterday meaning alot of people are reading this.
    > Deano, explain the big picture to him, please. lol
    > Sharon
    You must be confused with your high school youth friend. I am neither goofy or dense and
    have been working in a highly technical, intuitive, field for years. I'm sure plenty of
    people are reading this as you enjoy reaping the public bias perception; I get to extract a
    little bit more of clarifying information about your mind set, and your progress. I don't
    need the big picture or the straight skinny. I don't even have to inquire about your next
    trip to Washington D.C. or any other major mold warrior event. I belive you have provided
    enough information for people to decide if they would like for you to continue to represent
    their case.

    I do get the defense strategy, I just don't buy into what you are going to provide to the
    courts will remand the ruling back to court for a retrial, or overturn the jury decision.
    Your so focused on the scales of justice tilting from one side based upon liable words to the
    other side for perjury. The courts just don't work that way. There is way too much
    extraneous words and emotions in your presentation and not fully packed with facts. Alot of

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.