Follow us!

    Re: Kelman v Kramer ruling 12.29.09

    Posted by johncodie on 1/20/10

    On 1/20/10, Sharon wrote:
    > Oh really? Care to put a wager on it? I will give you a hint: You can't use criminal perjury
    > to "legally" prove you were maliciously accused of criminal perjury, particularly if you are
    > author of US public health policy papers for the US Chamber of Commerce, et al. That is
    > called "strategically and criminally litigating with further criminal intent"

    You will have to give context to who "you" is as if is a attorney in a trail, an expert
    witness, and "legally" in what context?

    Your mind is truly twisted right now.

    I know for a fact that attorneys for industry use to litigate all the time over patent
    infringements just because it was good busniness practices. It didn't matter if they had a case
    or not; They make money in litigation. It might be using the courts for their financial gain,
    but they always have access to the court system just like you.

    Are you going deeper and deeper in a world of killing all the officials of the court because
    they are criminally engaging in strategical litigation for future criminal intent of more
    litigation. Perhaps we should warn potential law students and others in your community of this
    perception of "SCLWFCI"

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.