Re: Judge tosses Twitter libel suit
Posted by Sharon on 1/29/10
"Isn't this the case that your trying to emulate?"
No. I posted it because it was issue significant and was in the
"The case is considered a victory for freedom of speech as well
as a prime example of jury nullification"
Where did that quote come from? The twitter case never got close
to a jury.
"You case wasn't a twitter it was more directive."
Twitter was not the issue of the Chicago SLAPP, it was lack of
merit to prove libel with actual malice.
"So how do you change the law?"
Well, other than sitting on the Supreme Court and being an advocate
judge for corporations, you don't. You follow the law.
On 1/29/10, johncodie wrote:
> On 1/29/10, sharon wrote:
>> Why do you write such stuff? Its goofy. Anyone who knew even
>> the elementary facts of my case would easily be able to see
>> that you are writing without knowledge of what you write.
> Isn't this the case that your trying to emulate?
> "The case is considered a victory for freedom of speech as well
> as a prime example of jury nullification"
> You case wasn't a twitter it was more directive.
> So how do you change the law?
Posts on this thread, including this one