Re: Huffington Post ~ Melinda Ballard ~ Daniel Heimpel ` Mol
Posted by Deborah on 2/22/10
Yep, he is all about the children. As long as they don't show signs of
mold induced illness caused by exposure to said mold 'cause then they'd
be liars.
On 2/21/10, Sharon Kramer wrote:
> It is such a small world, isn't it? The Huffington Post wrote a
> beautiful tribute to Melinda Ballard's father, Claude Ballard Jr. in
> February 2010.
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andrew-reinbach/claude-m-ballard-jr----
> re_b_462103.html
>
>
> Melinda Ballard has been a staunch advocate for those injured by mold,
> etc, in water damaged buildings. Melinda Ballard agreed to an
> interview with Daniel Heimpel of LA Weekly in the summer of 2008 about
> another staunch advocate for those injured by mold, me.
>
> Heimpel INTENTIONALLY misquoted Melinda Ballard for the article in the
> 2008 LA Weekly article to the benefit of the US Chamber of Commerce to
> be able to continue to perpetrate an interstate fraud on the courts
> over the mold issue (scientifically proven the poisons of mold do not
> poision). This is the same fraud that Melinda fights against in the
> name of public health. Heimpel's fraud of the matter was edited by
> Jill Stewart of LAWeekly. Stewart has such a horrible reputation of
> skewing journalism, that the LA Times wrote about her in 2009.
>
> http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jun/19/entertainment/et-onthemedia19
>
> Melinda Ballard sent a message informing LAWeekly's then editor,
Laurie
> Ochoa, regarding Daniel Heimpel's and Jill Stewart's FRAUDULENT
writing
> for LAWeekly evidencing for them several statements of INTENTIONALLY
> misquoting Melinda to aid and abet the US Chamber's fraud that is
> adverse to the health and safety of the American public. See Melinda'
> message to LA Weekly linked below:
>
> http://freepdfhosting.com/8b7ed32a44.pdf
>
> And NOW Daniel Heimpel, clearly evidenced as a bonified shill for the
> US Chamber of Commerce who has assisted them to be able to deny
> causation of illness from environmental exposures, has morphed into a
> social advocate for children, who is a blogger for the Huffington Post.
>
> http://katysexposure.wordpress.com/2009/12/02/huffington-post-blogger-
> heimpel-is-shill-for-us-chamber/
>
> Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive!
>
> Thank God for people like Melinda Ballard in this world who will
always
> stand up and tell the truth!
>
> Sharon
>
>
> On 2/20/10, Deborah wrote:
>> LOL. Now, that takes some brass ones...to target an opponent over
>> something that he had personal and direct experience with...
>>
>> On 2/20/10, Sharon wrote:
>>> A new article that has come up regarding Melinda and her impact on
>>> itegrity in Texas politics:
>>>
>>> http://www.setexasrecord.com/arguments/224881-legally-speaking-know-
>>> before-you-vote-the-texas-supreme-court-races
>>>
>>> "In 2002, when flyers were distributed in Rep. Green's district
>>> attacking his opponent Patrick Rose about mold remediation lawsuits
>>> and plaintiffs, the tactic backfired. One of the targets of the ad,
>>> Melinda Ballard (who had prevailed in a $32 million homeowners'
>>> mold lawsuit), went public with the revelation that Green himself
>>> had filed a mold claim in 2001 and that his insurance carrier had
>>> paid for Green and his family to stay at Austin's downtown Omni
>>> Hotel."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/18/10, Deborah wrote:
>>>> I applaud her tenacity and courage to stand up to the insurance
>>>> company.
>>>>
>>>> Average citizens simply do not have the resources to take even the
>>>> most meritorious cases all the way to the end and corporations are
>>>> well aware of this.
>>>>
>>>> We must rely on people like her to get what little justice there
>>>> is to be had against such fraudulent practices.
>>>>
>>>> On 2/17/10, Sharon wrote:
>>>>> John Codie,
>>>>>
>>>>> This is now the FOURTH time I have had to agree with your
>>>>> writing in less than two weeks time. That is EXACTLY why I
>>>>> posted this. Kind of a historical reference to the mold issue
>>>>> since the Ballard case - whether one agrees with it or not -
>>>>> was a pinnicle point in the issue. It is good to understand
>>>>> where people who have had an impact on history came from. That
>>>>> is why so many biographies get written.
>>>>>
>>>>> I did not post it for the intent that RD would use it as an
>>>>> opportunity to bash a woman - a fellow human being - who just
>>>>> lost a loved one merely days ago.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/17/10, JohnCodie wrote:
>>>>>> I appreciate the information, it serves as a reminder as
>>>>>> fortunate an individual might be in building a family
>>>>>> fortune and providing the family with the fortitude to
>>>>>> continue with his/her legacy. Like the popular movie the
>>>>>> Titanic money follows money and so like the real estate
>>>>>> business, im sure there are the faithful followers of those
>>>>>> who saw retail headed to shopping malls in the early years.
>>>>>> Money didn't save the rich on the Tatantic but it gave them
>>>>>> an advantage to the lower class trapped/locked below the
>>>>>> waterline. Its true the award was greatly reduced and more
>>>>>> political actions in favor in the insurance industry was
>>>>>> provided by the State of Texas. Was it the Ballards were
>>>>>> Democratic living in a Repulican state? Who knows what
>>>>>> entailed those many miles of tavel miles of sales. Mr.
>>>>>> Ballard seems to have had the gift for making the sale.
>>>>>> Good for him, we need more sales people like him today. I
>>>>>> hear to many relative say they just can't sell anything in
>>>>>> todays economy. Obviously they are'nt trying. Three cheers
>>>>>> for the Ballards for continuing inspite of being told "No".
Posts on this thread, including this one