Re: Moldy Logic NAA Amicus 2009 & Blog 2010
Posted by sharon on 5/23/10
I think it means something to people like that when the flawed concept that one can legally operate void of truth, gets translated into monitary terms by their risk assessors. On 5/23/10, Deborah wrote: > Truth and evidence mean nothing to people like that, NOTHING. > > > On 5/22/10, Sharon wrote: >> RemDud, >> >> Do you even read what you are responding to before you write? >> >> RD Quote: >> The NAA’s position on mold is consistent with current research and >> facts regarding mold exposure and does not embrace the junk >> science associated with the black toxic mold hysteria. With >> frivolous litigation a real danger for multifamily operators, it >> is reassuring that the Chamber of Commerce document and many >> others are finding their way into the courts. >> >> "The NAA’s position on mold is consistent with current research and >> facts regarding mold exposure and does not embrace the junk science >> associated with the black toxic mold hysteria." >> >> NAA May 21, 2010 >> >> "THE MOLD THAT WE DEAL WITH IN OUR INDUSTRY CAN POSE POTENTIALLY >> HARMFUL EFFECTS TO RESIDENTS, EMPLOYEES....REMEMBER, MOLD CAN CAUSE >> MAJOR HEALTH PROBLEMS AND EVEN DEATH" >> >> US Chamber July 17, 2003 >> >> "THUS THE NOTION THAT TOXIC MOLD IS AN INSIDIOUS SECRET KILLER AS SO >> MANY TRIAL LAWYERS AND MEDIA WOULD CLAIM IS JUNK SCIENCE UNSUPPORTED >> BY ACTUAL SCIENTIFIC STUDY" >> >> NAA August 31, 2009 >> >> "A PANEL OF SCIENTISTS (who won't even claim they wrote the following >> paper we are citing for the courts on their CV's)..FIND THAT YEARS OF >> INTENSE STUDY HAVE FAILED TO PRODUCE ANY CAUSAL CONNECTION BETWEEN >> EXPOSURE TO INDOOR MOLD AND ADVERSE HEALTH EFFECTS' US CHAMBER OF >> COMMERCE, A SCIENTIFIC VIEW OF THE HEALTH EFFECTS OF MOLD (2003)" >> >> RemDud May 22, 2010 >> >> "YEA THE NAA IS RIGHT WHEN THEY PUT IT INTO LEGAL DOCUMENTS FOR >> JUDGE'S EYES THAT MOLD DOESN'T HARM TENANTS WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY and >> PUBLICLY TELLING THEIR MEMBERS IT CAN KILL THEIR TENANTS. DOH!" >> >> It really is scary that you could be considered a professional >> advisor in this issue. >> >> >> On 5/22/10, Rem Dude wrote: >>> The NAA’s position on mold is consistent with current research and >>> facts regarding mold exposure and does not embrace the junk >>> science associated with the black toxic mold hysteria. With >>> frivolous litigation a real danger for multifamily operators, it >>> is reassuring that the Chamber of Commerce document and many >>> others are finding their way into the courts. >>> >>> It is time that the hysteria surrounding “black toxic mold” cease. >>> It is also time for those pushing the black toxic mold agenda wake >>> up and embrace the facts as well. >>> >>> Rem Dude >>> >>> On 5/22/10, Sharon wrote: >>>> Rem Dude, >>>> >>>> Really? Then why is the NAA educating their members that mold >>>> can harm tenants' health and sometimes even cause death..while >>>> their attorneys are telling judges the EXACT opposite? >>>> >>>> The US Chamber paper claims that it is scientifically >>> proven "the >>>> notion that toxic mold is an insidious secret killer is a result >>>> of trial lawyers, media and junk science". Not according to the >>>> NAA's own blog as they are informing their members why it is >>>> important to address asap. >>>> >>>> Can you cite to the scientific source reference for the >>>> concluding above statement found in the US Chamber paper, "A >>>> Scientific View of the Health Effects of Mold"? >>>> >>>> And if this is such a stellar substantive science paper, then >>> why >>>> do you think none of its named co-authors will even claim they >>>> wrote it, in on their CV's? >>>> >>>> http://katysexposure.wordpress.com/2010/04/30/truth-out-sharon- >>>> kramer-letter-to-andrew-saxon-mold-issue/ >>>> >>>> It really is a bit scary that you give advice to people, both >>>> occupants and owners/property mgrs, while professing to have >>>> expertise in this area. Wonder how much money has been wasted >>>> when prop mgrs have been forced to defend the lack of protection >>>> for their occupants/bad faith because they relied on >>>> your "professional" advice. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 5/22/10, Rem Dude wrote: >>>>> “A Scientific View of the Health Effects of Mold” is an >>>>> excellent guidance document for property managers and those >>>>> who have been frightened by black toxic mold hysteria. We >>>>> constantly encounter clients who have become terrified of >>>>> bathroom mold after reading web sites pontificating the >>>>> lethality of all things moldy. >>>>> >>>>> Fortunately, the Chamber of Commerce and many other well >>>>> respected organizations and researchers are getting the truth >>>>> out regarding the true dangers of mold exposure. >>>>> >>>>> Rem Dude >>>>> >>>>> On 5/20/10, Deborah wrote: >>>>>> They have seen the light...with much prodding, of course. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 5/19/10, Sharon Kramer wrote: >>>>>>> August 31, 2009 NAA Amicus Curiae Brief submitted into a >>>>>>> litigation as a purportedly substantive scientific >>>>>>> reference for the courts to consider when denying insurer >>>>>>> and NAA member responsibility for causation of new born >>>>>>> infant deaths from mold: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> “In a report entitled, ‘A Scientific View of the Health >>>>>>> Effects of Mold’, a panel of scientists, including >>>>>>> toxicologists and industrial hygienists stated that years >>>>>>> of intense study have failed to produce any causal >>>>>>> connection between exposure to indoor mold and adverse >>>>>>> health effects.’ U.S. Chamber of Commerce, A Scientific >>>>>>> View of the Health Effects of Mold (2003)” >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> May 19, 2010 NAA Website: >>>>>>> Mold: Your Silent Enemy -Blog >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "The mold that we deal with in our industry can pose >>>>>>> potentially harmful effects to residents, employees and to >>>>>>> your company’s bottom line" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (Gee, wonder what else could cause problems with a >>>>>>> company's bottom line....in a legal proceeding?) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.naahq.org/blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx? >>>>>>> List=9d9bf7fe&37;2D13ea&37;2D4bf2&37;2Db7d6&37; >>>>>>> 2Ddd27c8ac4533&ID=178&utm&37;5Fsource=feedburner&utm&37; >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> 5Fmedium=feed&utm&37;5Fcampaign=Feed&37;3A&37;20APTlySpoken&37; >>>>> 20&37; >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> 28APTly&37;20Spoken&37;20&37;2D&37;20the&37;20NAA&37;20Blog&37; >>>>> 29
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Moldy Logic NAA Amicus 2009 & Blog 2010, 5/19/10, by Sharon Kramer.
- Re: Moldy Logic NAA Amicus 2009 & Blog 2010, 5/20/10, by Deborah.
- Re: Moldy Logic NAA Amicus 2009 & Blog 2010, 5/20/10, by Sharon.
- Re: Moldy Logic NAA Amicus 2009 & Blog 2010, 5/22/10, by Rem Dude.
- Re: Moldy Logic NAA Amicus 2009 & Blog 2010, 5/22/10, by Sharon.
- Re: Moldy Logic NAA Amicus 2009 & Blog 2010, 5/22/10, by Rem Dude.
- Re: Moldy Logic NAA Amicus 2009 & Blog 2010, 5/22/10, by Sharon.
- Re: Moldy Logic NAA Amicus 2009 & Blog 2010, 5/23/10, by Deborah.
- Re: Moldy Logic NAA Amicus 2009 & Blog 2010, 5/23/10, by sharon.
- Re: Moldy Logic NAA Amicus 2009 & Blog 2010, 5/23/10, by Deborah.
- Re: Moldy Logic NAA Amicus 2009 & Blog 2010, 5/24/10, by Sharon.
|