Re: ACHEMMIC

More | Report Post

On 8/08/10, Deborah Daniels wrote:
> To Whom It May Concern:
>
> I was affiliated with the aforementioned group using my
> married name of Davitt. I have recently resigned from this
> group to which I contributed virtually nothing.
>
> I wish to take the time to point out that there is a member
> on the board, one Lee Daniels, listed as a public health
> advocate, who is not a relative of mine or in any way
> connected to my family. I have no personal knowledge of
> this person or his/her activism in IAQ issues.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Deborah Daniels Davitt

I pulled up the membership list and found alot of wolfs in
sheep skins. Many ready and able to take up your cause for
a special fee. They got together to write their own
position paper; while claiming the US Navy has their own
mold remediation guidelines. Just more sheepskin to cover
the money blood hungry of wanting to obtain federal funding
for mold studies. The US Navy builds their primary
resicence out either steel, or fiber glass; wood products
providing fuel for harmful toxic fumes are not desired. The
most proficient manual for toxic removal is the acidic
cleaning of the toliets. So why would this group take a
Katrina handout provided to rescue workers for Katrina
clearly giving outdated references to the New York City
Guidelines and try to turn it into a Federal Mold Guideline
Document? So it would legitimize their position? I
champion and applaud your decision. I only wish Sharon
would likewise disassociate. The group is no more than a
Tea party soliciting for funds so support their gravy
train. What is a bandwagon without the hay, just a buch of
boobs, on public display. jc