Follow us!


    Posted by Deborah on 8/10/10

    "Regardless of leaving ACHEMMIC, I am a staunch supporter of the
    validity and integrity in science behind the POA paper. I
    think that Deborah and others who have left ACHEMMIC are, too,
    as far as I know." Sharon

    Yes, Sharon, you are correct. Mold-induced illness is real and it
    makes one susceptible to many other pathogens, illnesses and
    chemicals. The POA paper is very important, I wish it had been
    out when this started for me. It was hard fighting against the
    current while most were telling me I was either imagining things,
    exaggerating or nuts.


    Just when I find myself starting to agree with some of your
    points, you derail somewhere.

    I don't know anything about Jeanine Moseley, but I hope that she
    is doing okay.

    On 8/10/10, Sharon Kramer wrote:
    > John Codie,
    > Where on earth do you get this stuff? For such a skeptic, you
    > are quite a conspiracy theory nut!
    > None of the authors of that paper - which is put out by
    > Policyholders Of America - is promoting false science. It is
    > all well documented by scientific reference.
    > CIRS from WDB is an illness that the Department of Labor
    > awarded disability to an air traffic controller well over a
    > year ago. It is all properly disclosed who does what in this
    > issue.
    > What you don't seem to understand is that in order to show
    > conflict of interest, you have to be able to show:
    > a. that someone published misleading scientific information
    > b. that they did it for financial motivation.
    > That is not the case with this paper.
    > ER.pdf
    > As far as ACHEMMIC, I too left the org. I did this about a
    > month ago. It was hampering my ability to speak out directly
    > of the politics behind the deceit of the US Chamber et al.
    > which definately qualifies under criteria a & b above for
    > conflicts of interest causing the promotion of false science.
    > Regardless of leaving ACHEMMIC, I am a staunch supporter of the
    > validity and integrity in science behind the POA paper. I
    > think that Deborah and others who have left ACHEMMIC are, too,
    > as far as I know.
    > Sharon
    > On 8/10/10, JohnCodie wrote:
    >> On 8/08/10, Deborah Daniels wrote:
    >>> To Whom It May Concern:
    >>> I was affiliated with the aforementioned group using my
    >>> married name of Davitt. I have recently resigned from this
    >>> group to which I contributed virtually nothing.
    >>> I wish to take the time to point out that there is a member
    >>> on the board, one Lee Daniels, listed as a public health
    >>> advocate, who is not a relative of mine or in any way
    >>> connected to my family. I have no personal knowledge of
    >>> this person or his/her activism in IAQ issues.
    >>> Sincerely,
    >>> Deborah Daniels Davitt
    >> I pulled up the membership list and found alot of wolfs in
    >> sheep skins. Many ready and able to take up your cause for
    >> a special fee. They got together to write their own
    >> position paper; while claiming the US Navy has their own
    >> mold remediation guidelines. Just more sheepskin to cover
    >> the money blood hungry of wanting to obtain federal funding
    >> for mold studies. The US Navy builds their primary
    >> resicence out either steel, or fiber glass; wood products
    >> providing fuel for harmful toxic fumes are not desired. The
    >> most proficient manual for toxic removal is the acidic
    >> cleaning of the toliets. So why would this group take a
    >> Katrina handout provided to rescue workers for Katrina
    >> clearly giving outdated references to the New York City
    >> Guidelines and try to turn it into a Federal Mold Guideline
    >> Document? So it would legitimize their position? I
    >> champion and applaud your decision. I only wish Sharon
    >> would likewise disassociate. The group is no more than a
    >> Tea party soliciting for funds so support their gravy
    >> train. What is a bandwagon without the hay, just a buch of
    >> boobs, on public display. jc

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.