Follow us!


    Posted by Sharon on 8/10/10

    I know Jeannie Mosley. She is a very smart, self taught woman. She
    reads a gazillion science papers and then has an uncanny aptitude
    to interpret them into plain language, common sense. I learn alot
    from her.

    On 8/10/10, Deborah wrote:
    > "Regardless of leaving ACHEMMIC, I am a staunch supporter of the
    > validity and integrity in science behind the POA paper. I
    > think that Deborah and others who have left ACHEMMIC are, too,
    > as far as I know." Sharon
    > Yes, Sharon, you are correct. Mold-induced illness is real and it
    > makes one susceptible to many other pathogens, illnesses and
    > chemicals. The POA paper is very important, I wish it had been
    > out when this started for me. It was hard fighting against the
    > current while most were telling me I was either imagining things,
    > exaggerating or nuts.
    > JC,
    > Just when I find myself starting to agree with some of your
    > points, you derail somewhere.
    > I don't know anything about Jeanine Moseley, but I hope that she
    > is doing okay.
    > On 8/10/10, Sharon Kramer wrote:
    >> John Codie,
    >> Where on earth do you get this stuff? For such a skeptic, you
    >> are quite a conspiracy theory nut!
    >> None of the authors of that paper - which is put out by
    >> Policyholders Of America - is promoting false science. It is
    >> all well documented by scientific reference.
    >> CIRS from WDB is an illness that the Department of Labor
    >> awarded disability to an air traffic controller well over a
    >> year ago. It is all properly disclosed who does what in this
    >> issue.
    >> What you don't seem to understand is that in order to show
    >> conflict of interest, you have to be able to show:
    >> a. that someone published misleading scientific information
    >> b. that they did it for financial motivation.
    >> That is not the case with this paper.
    >> ER.pdf
    >> As far as ACHEMMIC, I too left the org. I did this about a
    >> month ago. It was hampering my ability to speak out directly
    >> of the politics behind the deceit of the US Chamber et al.
    >> which definately qualifies under criteria a & b above for
    >> conflicts of interest causing the promotion of false science.
    >> Regardless of leaving ACHEMMIC, I am a staunch supporter of the
    >> validity and integrity in science behind the POA paper. I
    >> think that Deborah and others who have left ACHEMMIC are, too,
    >> as far as I know.
    >> Sharon
    >> On 8/10/10, JohnCodie wrote:
    >>> On 8/08/10, Deborah Daniels wrote:
    >>>> To Whom It May Concern:
    >>>> I was affiliated with the aforementioned group using my
    >>>> married name of Davitt. I have recently resigned from this
    >>>> group to which I contributed virtually nothing.
    >>>> I wish to take the time to point out that there is a member
    >>>> on the board, one Lee Daniels, listed as a public health
    >>>> advocate, who is not a relative of mine or in any way
    >>>> connected to my family. I have no personal knowledge of
    >>>> this person or his/her activism in IAQ issues.
    >>>> Sincerely,
    >>>> Deborah Daniels Davitt
    >>> I pulled up the membership list and found alot of wolfs in
    >>> sheep skins. Many ready and able to take up your cause for
    >>> a special fee. They got together to write their own
    >>> position paper; while claiming the US Navy has their own
    >>> mold remediation guidelines. Just more sheepskin to cover
    >>> the money blood hungry of wanting to obtain federal funding
    >>> for mold studies. The US Navy builds their primary
    >>> resicence out either steel, or fiber glass; wood products
    >>> providing fuel for harmful toxic fumes are not desired. The
    >>> most proficient manual for toxic removal is the acidic
    >>> cleaning of the toliets. So why would this group take a
    >>> Katrina handout provided to rescue workers for Katrina
    >>> clearly giving outdated references to the New York City
    >>> Guidelines and try to turn it into a Federal Mold Guideline
    >>> Document? So it would legitimize their position? I
    >>> champion and applaud your decision. I only wish Sharon
    >>> would likewise disassociate. The group is no more than a
    >>> Tea party soliciting for funds so support their gravy
    >>> train. What is a bandwagon without the hay, just a buch of
    >>> boobs, on public display. jc

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.