Follow us!


    Posted by johncodie on 8/12/10

    On 8/11/10, Sharon wrote:
    > No. I don't know anyone named Sandra Tyson. And I do not generate income from this
    > issue - as you WELL KNOW - while promoting or not promoting ACHEMMIC's or anyone
    > else's agenda. No. I am not concerned about being a "noteworthy cyber space figure
    > of respect". If I was, I certainly wouldn't be participating in this nonsense on a
    > public forum with you!
    > This is what I want and what I have ALWAYS wanted: I was the deception of the US
    > Chamber of Commerce et al, over this issue that it has been scientifically proven
    > claims of mold induced illness are only being made because of "trial lawyers, media
    > and Junk Science" G-O-N-E from public health policy. That's it. That is all I want
    > and I will not be stopping until I get it. Can't. Too many lives at stake.

    Your legal defense does recieve money, as is any monitary judgements being paid on
    your behalf. So if your on the street pandering for a dollar, or you permit some to
    pander for that dollar on your behalf it is considered income. Your accountants can
    argue the arms lenght it did not go into my bank account, even though the soliciations
    use your name, and the purpose. You should know Sandra Tyson as she was one of the
    individuals pleading for help from these chat room relief groups. Maybe she could
    have benefited from one of those solicited dollars. She, and Frank, and Mary and
    others were trying to find the first 10 years benefits of the mold is gold melodrama.

    Prior to the Chamber of Commerce you wanted your house on the Lake fixed, placed in
    the same shape as it was before. You wanted to have public record of your daugher's
    health issues attributed from the generated mold. You wanted compensation for your
    and their pain and suffering. The Chamber of Commerce was only a party to the mold is
    gold melodrama when inspectors started cooking the mold. Ask any knowlegable
    inspectors. The Chamber used influence to reduce their members liability, mold has
    been added as an additional coverage, or removed from policies for years. ACHEMMIC
    and other groups are just trying to get numbers of minimum exposure so it justifies
    their business profit for having the government on their side. Even on hazadous waste
    site's for know PEL's the government is broke. You won't stop junk sceince until your
    groups start publishing it; you can't get the government onboard, and can't get your
    people in government positions. With the census, and statistics were a nation of
    numbers. There are no lives at stake! There are no numbers of deaths attributed to
    mold! There was a person "Sandra Tyson" who thought she would be the "one" to bear
    the proof; but you and your groups dismissed her. She and Frank, Mary have provided
    enough information to be given the opportunity to be counted as one of those
    statistics but they got ignored, or mistreated with the mold cure prescribed by some
    of these experts that are spreading their brand of junk science.


    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.