Follow us!


    Posted by Deborah on 8/12/10


    Mold does indeed kill people. I personally posted articles in which doctors admitted that
    there was not enough money to do full autopsies and there was German scientific paper that
    discussed similar findings based on random autopsies and comparisons to CODs listed on
    death certificates.

    Someone kept harping about the MMR weekly and I posted the above to show them why those
    stats prove nothing...they aren't going to find something they aren't even looking for..

    I nearly died in my place, I didn't know at that time that the mold was in my home and I
    was sleeping directly under one of the vents. If I'd gone to the hospital, they would not
    have had a clue what I had and would have bombarded me with steroids, antibiotics and the
    kitchen sink quite possible making my situation worse and weakening my already damaged
    immune system. We've had these discussions ad nauseum here and the science IS backing up
    what was premised early on; each person's individual health determines the threshold limit
    of exposure to mold that will make them ill.

    Mention having been poisoned with banned pesticides to most docs and they can't get away
    from you fast enough ( this is the petrochemical corridor and we've had that discussion
    numerous times ).

    And, for the record, I wish y'all would stop giving ACHEMMIC free PR. I feel used enough
    after all this, especially after touting a couple of doctors and their papers that are
    members of that group. Couple of them got big work in LA and surrounding areas after
    Katrina and I KNOW I put their name in front of a huge number of people.

    Like I said, my apathy now is because I never had one attorney or doctor, with the
    exception of Lipsey, make any effort to assist me in any of this, but I know I did a lot
    of free research and leg work for them. ENOUGH.

    On 8/12/10, johncodie wrote:
    > On 8/11/10, Sharon wrote:
    >> No. I don't know anyone named Sandra Tyson. And I do not generate income from this
    >> issue - as you WELL KNOW - while promoting or not promoting ACHEMMIC's or anyone
    >> else's agenda. No. I am not concerned about being a "noteworthy cyber space figure
    >> of respect". If I was, I certainly wouldn't be participating in this nonsense on a
    >> public forum with you!
    >> This is what I want and what I have ALWAYS wanted: I was the deception of the US
    >> Chamber of Commerce et al, over this issue that it has been scientifically proven
    > all
    >> claims of mold induced illness are only being made because of "trial lawyers, media
    >> and Junk Science" G-O-N-E from public health policy. That's it. That is all I want
    >> and I will not be stopping until I get it. Can't. Too many lives at stake.
    > Your legal defense does recieve money, as is any monitary judgements being paid on
    > your behalf. So if your on the street pandering for a dollar, or you permit some to
    > pander for that dollar on your behalf it is considered income. Your accountants can
    > argue the arms lenght it did not go into my bank account, even though the soliciations
    > use your name, and the purpose. You should know Sandra Tyson as she was one of the
    > individuals pleading for help from these chat room relief groups. Maybe she could
    > have benefited from one of those solicited dollars. She, and Frank, and Mary and
    > others were trying to find the first 10 years benefits of the mold is gold melodrama.
    > Prior to the Chamber of Commerce you wanted your house on the Lake fixed, placed in
    > the same shape as it was before. You wanted to have public record of your daugher's
    > health issues attributed from the generated mold. You wanted compensation for your
    > and their pain and suffering. The Chamber of Commerce was only a party to the mold is
    > gold melodrama when inspectors started cooking the mold. Ask any knowlegable
    > inspectors. The Chamber used influence to reduce their members liability, mold has
    > been added as an additional coverage, or removed from policies for years. ACHEMMIC
    > and other groups are just trying to get numbers of minimum exposure so it justifies
    > their business profit for having the government on their side. Even on hazadous waste
    > site's for know PEL's the government is broke. You won't stop junk sceince until your
    > groups start publishing it; you can't get the government onboard, and can't get your
    > people in government positions. With the census, and statistics were a nation of
    > numbers. There are no lives at stake! There are no numbers of deaths attributed to
    > mold! There was a person "Sandra Tyson" who thought she would be the "one" to bear
    > the proof; but you and your groups dismissed her. She and Frank, Mary have provided
    > enough information to be given the opportunity to be counted as one of those
    > statistics but they got ignored, or mistreated with the mold cure prescribed by some
    > of these experts that are spreading their brand of junk science.
    > jc

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.