Follow us!

    Re: Lack of Transparency cause for concern

    Posted by Deborah on 8/12/10

    Wow, great way to give that group more attention.

    This article reminded me of it, perhaps remaining member will be asked to sign a confidentiality
    agreement next.

    On 8/12/10, Sharon wrote:
    > JC
    > Like I said you assume facts not in evidence in your hypotheses which causes your conclusions
    > to be incorrect based on the false assumptions.
    > 1. My house was under 2000 sf. It was a beautiful little gem. But small. Got more than
    > enough had I been inclined to remodel from top to bottom.
    > Not even going to bother with the rest. Why are you always so interested in my personal
    > life? Are you sure I didn't turn you down for a date or something at your favorite
    > university in the whole world - Ole Miss?
    > On 8/12/10, johncodie wrote:
    >> On 8/12/10, Sharon wrote:
    >>> JC,
    >>> 1. I received close to a half a million dollar settlement in my private litigation of 8
    >>> years ago. More than enough to get my old house fixed if I was so inclined to do so.
    >> A half a millon doesn't come close to replacing a house that size, not even close to the
    >> amount orginaly awarded to your freind Ms Ballard. You left the house and moved into town
    >> closer to your husbands business and have ravine and walking path in place of a lake view.
    >> No pool where you had a pool, and no place to park that big RV,or dock the boat. I know
    >> those prices you tried to get in Rancho Sante Fe, those were in the millons. You settled
    >> for what you could get so have the attorneys paid.
    >>> 2. People made contributions to my legal defense fund Because I was the first to
    >>> publicly write of the deception of the US Chamber of Commerce's marketing campaign for
    >>> the courts in the writing in question. It is kind of important to shut this down. Five
    >>> years later, the case is still in the courts and will continue in the courts until this
    >>> stopped as it is harming MANY.
    >> People made request for your legal defense fund because your actions resulted in a
    >> judgement your still trying to get out of, which benefited Thrasher, and Shoemaker; who
    >> depended on you to get the winds blowing in their direction as being a solution to mold
    >> related problems. It's not the Chambers paper or the opposing view paper that is harming
    >> anybody. You got yourself into a political tail spin and can't get out with your dignity
    >> intact. There are no mold people being found with toxins. None.
    >>> 3. There is no monitary judgement being paid on my behalf. Quit making stuff up, John!
    >> There is a judgement and it is costing you dearly. You might not have had to cut back on
    >> the number of packs of cigarrettes you smoke but it is a drain. Can you go another 5
    >> years?
    >>> 4. I'm sorry. I don't know Sandra Tyson but do know thousands of others pleading for
    >>> help. Shutting down the deceit of the Chamber will help stop this.
    >> You should know Sandra Tyson, you should Frank, you should know Mary; they were the grass
    >> roots supporting your cause. The Chamber is a personal issue of which you picked the
    >> battle. It had no bearing on Sandra Tyson.
    >>> 5. I left ACHEMMIC. I can't speak for what they do or do not do.
    >> Why do good people put their name on a petetion, or join a political group when they don't
    >> know what they do or not do. At your national level of recognition don't you think you
    >> should be sure of an association before put your name with theirs.
    >>> 6. You still sound bitter that all did not go well for you 10 years ago and if things did
    >>> not go well for you, then they should not go well for anyone else. Wrong attitude for
    >>> one to live their life by.
    >> Things did go exceptionaly well for us, we avoided having our nest egg washed away with
    >> Katrinia, We were able to place the children in private school, and an ivy league collage.
    >> We are thus far avoiding the massive layoffs not seen for 36 years. I can play golf or
    >> tennis with the children, where once I was looking for fuel to heat the home. Your
    >> settlement was two years prior to our settlement; so no the M. Ballard mold is gold rush
    >> wasn't used as it had no bearing. Two honest men set the sights for the litigation of
    >> breach of contract, not mold. It was really never an issue. The Chamber of Commerce Paper
    >> has no influence when the court takes all evidence at face value. Find the people that are
    >> covered in mold and that is your beginning. The mold era is over, even if your case hasn't
    >> been dismissed.
    >> jc
    >>> Sharon
    >>> On 8/12/10, johncodie wrote:
    >>>> On 8/11/10, Sharon wrote:
    >>>>> No. I don't know anyone named Sandra Tyson. And I do not generate income from this
    >>>>> issue - as you WELL KNOW - while promoting or not promoting ACHEMMIC's or anyone
    >>>>> else's agenda. No. I am not concerned about being a "noteworthy cyber space figure
    >>>>> of respect". If I was, I certainly wouldn't be participating in this nonsense on a
    >>>>> public forum with you!
    >>>>> This is what I want and what I have ALWAYS wanted: I was the deception of the US
    >>>>> Chamber of Commerce et al, over this issue that it has been scientifically proven
    >>>> all
    >>>>> claims of mold induced illness are only being made because of "trial lawyers, media
    >>>>> and Junk Science" G-O-N-E from public health policy. That's it. That is all I want
    >>>>> and I will not be stopping until I get it. Can't. Too many lives at stake.
    >>>> Your legal defense does recieve money, as is any monitary judgements being paid on
    >>>> your behalf. So if your on the street pandering for a dollar, or you permit some to
    >>>> pander for that dollar on your behalf it is considered income. Your accountants can
    >>>> argue the arms lenght it did not go into my bank account, even though the soliciations
    >>>> use your name, and the purpose. You should know Sandra Tyson as she was one of the
    >>>> individuals pleading for help from these chat room relief groups. Maybe she could
    >>>> have benefited from one of those solicited dollars. She, and Frank, and Mary and
    >>>> others were trying to find the first 10 years benefits of the mold is gold melodrama.
    >>>> Prior to the Chamber of Commerce you wanted your house on the Lake fixed, placed in
    >>>> the same shape as it was before. You wanted to have public record of your daugher's
    >>>> health issues attributed from the generated mold. You wanted compensation for your
    >>>> and their pain and suffering. The Chamber of Commerce was only a party to the mold is
    >>>> gold melodrama when inspectors started cooking the mold. Ask any knowlegable
    >>>> inspectors. The Chamber used influence to reduce their members liability, mold has
    >>>> been added as an additional coverage, or removed from policies for years. ACHEMMIC
    >>>> and other groups are just trying to get numbers of minimum exposure so it justifies
    >>>> their business profit for having the government on their side. Even on hazadous waste
    >>>> site's for know PEL's the government is broke. You won't stop junk sceince until your
    >>>> groups start publishing it; you can't get the government onboard, and can't get your
    >>>> people in government positions. With the census, and statistics were a nation of
    >>>> numbers. There are no lives at stake! There are no numbers of deaths attributed to
    >>>> mold! There was a person "Sandra Tyson" who thought she would be the "one" to bear
    >>>> the proof; but you and your groups dismissed her. She and Frank, Mary have provided
    >>>> enough information to be given the opportunity to be counted as one of those
    >>>> statistics but they got ignored, or mistreated with the mold cure prescribed by some
    >>>> of these experts that are spreading their brand of junk science.
    >>>> jc

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.