Re: ACHK cough
Posted by Deborah on 8/12/10
You know perfectly well that people die from fungal infections, for you to suggest otherwise is
deliberately deceitful. The science has been surpressed for so long that when I asked 4 doctors
back in 2001 if it were possible to have a fungal infection of the sinus, they all said, "NO"
immediately and unequivocally; 2 were ENTs. Were they lying or incompetent and does it matter
which if you are the person suffering?
Shame on you.
On 8/12/10, johncodie wrote:
> On 8/12/10, Sharon wrote:
>> Like I said you assume facts not in evidence in your hypotheses which causes your conclusions
>> to be incorrect based on the false assumptions.
> The facts are the photographs of your home, RV, Pool, Aerial Satellite square footage of your
> dwelling, and the price of a square foot of prime waterfront property. A half millon wouldn't
> have been enough to make you whole. You know the term location, location, location; and where
> you presently live just would not compare. Park the RV at the husbands business, and the boat
> gets stored a someone's storage. For a Rancho Santa Fe property you downsized, nice but not
> what you had come accoustomed. What ever else got used up on starting a mold is gold campaign
> that has you embroiled in a continuing legal drain of funds.
> Not intrested in your personal life because you are a public figure for mold, and you don't
> qualify for a personal life status anymore. Your still the same stuborn adolecence that never
> learned to fold a losing hand. Date Ole Miss? Thats a hoot, even though they have are
> deversified and lost the rebel mascot, the intelligent quotient there, wouldn't support a
> decent conversation. Get back on topic! Why would a person die from mold? How many funerals
> have you attended from those lost to the green, black fungus? It's only happening in your
> becauses someone put it in print, and you like to copy and paste the news of a popensity to
>> 1. My house was under 2000 sf. It was a beautiful little gem. But small. Got more than
>> enough had I been inclined to remodel from top to bottom.
>> Not even going to bother with the rest. Why are you always so interested in my personal
>> life? Are you sure I didn't turn you down for a date or something at your favorite
>> university in the whole world - Ole Miss?
>> On 8/12/10, johncodie wrote:
>>> On 8/12/10, Sharon wrote:
>>>> 1. I received close to a half a million dollar settlement in my private litigation of 8
>>>> years ago. More than enough to get my old house fixed if I was so inclined to do so.
>>> A half a millon doesn't come close to replacing a house that size, not even close to the
>>> amount orginaly awarded to your freind Ms Ballard. You left the house and moved into town
>>> closer to your husbands business and have ravine and walking path in place of a lake view.
>>> No pool where you had a pool, and no place to park that big RV,or dock the boat. I know
>>> those prices you tried to get in Rancho Sante Fe, those were in the millons. You settled
>>> for what you could get so have the attorneys paid.
>>>> 2. People made contributions to my legal defense fund Because I was the first to
>>>> publicly write of the deception of the US Chamber of Commerce's marketing campaign for
>>>> the courts in the writing in question. It is kind of important to shut this down. Five
>>>> years later, the case is still in the courts and will continue in the courts until this
>>>> stopped as it is harming MANY.
>>> People made request for your legal defense fund because your actions resulted in a
>>> judgement your still trying to get out of, which benefited Thrasher, and Shoemaker; who
>>> depended on you to get the winds blowing in their direction as being a solution to mold
>>> related problems. It's not the Chambers paper or the opposing view paper that is harming
>>> anybody. You got yourself into a political tail spin and can't get out with your dignity
>>> intact. There are no mold people being found with toxins. None.
>>>> 3. There is no monitary judgement being paid on my behalf. Quit making stuff up, John!
>>> There is a judgement and it is costing you dearly. You might not have had to cut back on
>>> the number of packs of cigarrettes you smoke but it is a drain. Can you go another 5
>>>> 4. I'm sorry. I don't know Sandra Tyson but do know thousands of others pleading for
>>>> help. Shutting down the deceit of the Chamber will help stop this.
>>> You should know Sandra Tyson, you should Frank, you should know Mary; they were the grass
>>> roots supporting your cause. The Chamber is a personal issue of which you picked the
>>> battle. It had no bearing on Sandra Tyson.
>>>> 5. I left ACHEMMIC. I can't speak for what they do or do not do.
>>> Why do good people put their name on a petetion, or join a political group when they don't
>>> know what they do or not do. At your national level of recognition don't you think you
>>> should be sure of an association before put your name with theirs.
>>>> 6. You still sound bitter that all did not go well for you 10 years ago and if things did
>>>> not go well for you, then they should not go well for anyone else. Wrong attitude for
>>>> one to live their life by.
>>> Things did go exceptionaly well for us, we avoided having our nest egg washed away with
>>> Katrinia, We were able to place the children in private school, and an ivy league collage.
>>> We are thus far avoiding the massive layoffs not seen for 36 years. I can play golf or
>>> tennis with the children, where once I was looking for fuel to heat the home. Your
>>> settlement was two years prior to our settlement; so no the M. Ballard mold is gold rush
>>> wasn't used as it had no bearing. Two honest men set the sights for the litigation of
>>> breach of contract, not mold. It was really never an issue. The Chamber of Commerce Paper
>>> has no influence when the court takes all evidence at face value. Find the people that are
>>> covered in mold and that is your beginning. The mold era is over, even if your case hasn't
>>> been dismissed.
>>>> On 8/12/10, johncodie wrote:
>>>>> On 8/11/10, Sharon wrote:
>>>>>> No. I don't know anyone named Sandra Tyson. And I do not generate income from this
>>>>>> issue - as you WELL KNOW - while promoting or not promoting ACHEMMIC's or anyone
>>>>>> else's agenda. No. I am not concerned about being a "noteworthy cyber space figure
>>>>>> of respect". If I was, I certainly wouldn't be participating in this nonsense on a
>>>>>> public forum with you!
>>>>>> This is what I want and what I have ALWAYS wanted: I was the deception of the US
>>>>>> Chamber of Commerce et al, over this issue that it has been scientifically proven
>>>>>> claims of mold induced illness are only being made because of "trial lawyers, media
>>>>>> and Junk Science" G-O-N-E from public health policy. That's it. That is all I want
>>>>>> and I will not be stopping until I get it. Can't. Too many lives at stake.
>>>>> Your legal defense does recieve money, as is any monitary judgements being paid on
>>>>> your behalf. So if your on the street pandering for a dollar, or you permit some to
>>>>> pander for that dollar on your behalf it is considered income. Your accountants can
>>>>> argue the arms lenght it did not go into my bank account, even though the soliciations
>>>>> use your name, and the purpose. You should know Sandra Tyson as she was one of the
>>>>> individuals pleading for help from these chat room relief groups. Maybe she could
>>>>> have benefited from one of those solicited dollars. She, and Frank, and Mary and
>>>>> others were trying to find the first 10 years benefits of the mold is gold melodrama.
>>>>> Prior to the Chamber of Commerce you wanted your house on the Lake fixed, placed in
>>>>> the same shape as it was before. You wanted to have public record of your daugher's
>>>>> health issues attributed from the generated mold. You wanted compensation for your
>>>>> and their pain and suffering. The Chamber of Commerce was only a party to the mold is
>>>>> gold melodrama when inspectors started cooking the mold. Ask any knowlegable
>>>>> inspectors. The Chamber used influence to reduce their members liability, mold has
>>>>> been added as an additional coverage, or removed from policies for years. ACHEMMIC
>>>>> and other groups are just trying to get numbers of minimum exposure so it justifies
>>>>> their business profit for having the government on their side. Even on hazadous waste
>>>>> site's for know PEL's the government is broke. You won't stop junk sceince until your
>>>>> groups start publishing it; you can't get the government onboard, and can't get your
>>>>> people in government positions. With the census, and statistics were a nation of
>>>>> numbers. There are no lives at stake! There are no numbers of deaths attributed to
>>>>> mold! There was a person "Sandra Tyson" who thought she would be the "one" to bear
>>>>> the proof; but you and your groups dismissed her. She and Frank, Mary have provided
>>>>> enough information to be given the opportunity to be counted as one of those
>>>>> statistics but they got ignored, or mistreated with the mold cure prescribed by some
>>>>> of these experts that are spreading their brand of junk science.
Posts on this thread, including this one