Follow us!

    Re: ACHK cough

    Posted by Sharon on 8/12/10


    Wow! Where exactly is the great water front mansion I use to own? I seem to have misplaced it.

    Can you send me pictures so I know what to look for?

    I think you must have a dillusional fixation on what the lives of all people from Ole Miss are like.

    Fiddle dee dee. I am going to have to think about this one another day.

    Now: back to what is important stuff to be put on ToxLaw and shared among websites in order to stop
    a deception in health marketing (agnotology) from occurring in our courts:

    On 8/12/10, Deborah wrote:
    > JC,
    > You know perfectly well that people die from fungal infections, for you to suggest otherwise is
    > deliberately deceitful. The science has been surpressed for so long that when I asked 4 doctors
    > back in 2001 if it were possible to have a fungal infection of the sinus, they all said, "NO"
    > immediately and unequivocally; 2 were ENTs. Were they lying or incompetent and does it matter
    > which if you are the person suffering?
    > Shame on you.
    > On 8/12/10, johncodie wrote:
    >> On 8/12/10, Sharon wrote:
    >>> JC
    >>> Like I said you assume facts not in evidence in your hypotheses which causes your conclusions
    >>> to be incorrect based on the false assumptions.
    >> The facts are the photographs of your home, RV, Pool, Aerial Satellite square footage of your
    >> dwelling, and the price of a square foot of prime waterfront property. A half millon wouldn't
    >> have been enough to make you whole. You know the term location, location, location; and where
    >> you presently live just would not compare. Park the RV at the husbands business, and the boat
    >> gets stored a someone's storage. For a Rancho Santa Fe property you downsized, nice but not
    >> what you had come accoustomed. What ever else got used up on starting a mold is gold campaign
    >> that has you embroiled in a continuing legal drain of funds.
    >> Not intrested in your personal life because you are a public figure for mold, and you don't
    >> qualify for a personal life status anymore. Your still the same stuborn adolecence that never
    >> learned to fold a losing hand. Date Ole Miss? Thats a hoot, even though they have are
    >> deversified and lost the rebel mascot, the intelligent quotient there, wouldn't support a
    >> decent conversation. Get back on topic! Why would a person die from mold? How many funerals
    >> have you attended from those lost to the green, black fungus? It's only happening in your
    > mind
    >> becauses someone put it in print, and you like to copy and paste the news of a popensity to
    >> harm.
    >> jc
    >>> 1. My house was under 2000 sf. It was a beautiful little gem. But small. Got more than
    >>> enough had I been inclined to remodel from top to bottom.
    >>> Not even going to bother with the rest. Why are you always so interested in my personal
    >>> life? Are you sure I didn't turn you down for a date or something at your favorite
    >>> university in the whole world - Ole Miss?
    >>> On 8/12/10, johncodie wrote:
    >>>> On 8/12/10, Sharon wrote:
    >>>>> JC,
    >>>>> 1. I received close to a half a million dollar settlement in my private litigation of 8
    >>>>> years ago. More than enough to get my old house fixed if I was so inclined to do so.
    >>>> A half a millon doesn't come close to replacing a house that size, not even close to the
    >>>> amount orginaly awarded to your freind Ms Ballard. You left the house and moved into town
    >>>> closer to your husbands business and have ravine and walking path in place of a lake view.
    >>>> No pool where you had a pool, and no place to park that big RV,or dock the boat. I know
    >>>> those prices you tried to get in Rancho Sante Fe, those were in the millons. You settled
    >>>> for what you could get so have the attorneys paid.
    >>>>> 2. People made contributions to my legal defense fund Because I was the first to
    >>>>> publicly write of the deception of the US Chamber of Commerce's marketing campaign for
    >>>>> the courts in the writing in question. It is kind of important to shut this down. Five
    >>>>> years later, the case is still in the courts and will continue in the courts until this
    >>>>> stopped as it is harming MANY.
    >>>> People made request for your legal defense fund because your actions resulted in a
    >>>> judgement your still trying to get out of, which benefited Thrasher, and Shoemaker; who
    >>>> depended on you to get the winds blowing in their direction as being a solution to mold
    >>>> related problems. It's not the Chambers paper or the opposing view paper that is harming
    >>>> anybody. You got yourself into a political tail spin and can't get out with your dignity
    >>>> intact. There are no mold people being found with toxins. None.
    >>>>> 3. There is no monitary judgement being paid on my behalf. Quit making stuff up, John!
    >>>> There is a judgement and it is costing you dearly. You might not have had to cut back on
    >>>> the number of packs of cigarrettes you smoke but it is a drain. Can you go another 5
    >>>> years?
    >>>>> 4. I'm sorry. I don't know Sandra Tyson but do know thousands of others pleading for
    >>>>> help. Shutting down the deceit of the Chamber will help stop this.
    >>>> You should know Sandra Tyson, you should Frank, you should know Mary; they were the grass
    >>>> roots supporting your cause. The Chamber is a personal issue of which you picked the
    >>>> battle. It had no bearing on Sandra Tyson.
    >>>>> 5. I left ACHEMMIC. I can't speak for what they do or do not do.
    >>>> Why do good people put their name on a petetion, or join a political group when they don't
    >>>> know what they do or not do. At your national level of recognition don't you think you
    >>>> should be sure of an association before put your name with theirs.
    >>>>> 6. You still sound bitter that all did not go well for you 10 years ago and if things did
    >>>>> not go well for you, then they should not go well for anyone else. Wrong attitude for
    >>>>> one to live their life by.
    >>>> Things did go exceptionaly well for us, we avoided having our nest egg washed away with
    >>>> Katrinia, We were able to place the children in private school, and an ivy league collage.
    >>>> We are thus far avoiding the massive layoffs not seen for 36 years. I can play golf or
    >>>> tennis with the children, where once I was looking for fuel to heat the home. Your
    >>>> settlement was two years prior to our settlement; so no the M. Ballard mold is gold rush
    >>>> wasn't used as it had no bearing. Two honest men set the sights for the litigation of
    >>>> breach of contract, not mold. It was really never an issue. The Chamber of Commerce Paper
    >>>> has no influence when the court takes all evidence at face value. Find the people that are
    >>>> covered in mold and that is your beginning. The mold era is over, even if your case hasn't
    >>>> been dismissed.
    >>>> jc
    >>>>> Sharon
    >>>>> On 8/12/10, johncodie wrote:
    >>>>>> On 8/11/10, Sharon wrote:
    >>>>>>> No. I don't know anyone named Sandra Tyson. And I do not generate income from this
    >>>>>>> issue - as you WELL KNOW - while promoting or not promoting ACHEMMIC's or anyone
    >>>>>>> else's agenda. No. I am not concerned about being a "noteworthy cyber space figure
    >>>>>>> of respect". If I was, I certainly wouldn't be participating in this nonsense on a
    >>>>>>> public forum with you!
    >>>>>>> This is what I want and what I have ALWAYS wanted: I was the deception of the US
    >>>>>>> Chamber of Commerce et al, over this issue that it has been scientifically proven
    >>>>>> all
    >>>>>>> claims of mold induced illness are only being made because of "trial lawyers, media
    >>>>>>> and Junk Science" G-O-N-E from public health policy. That's it. That is all I want
    >>>>>>> and I will not be stopping until I get it. Can't. Too many lives at stake.
    >>>>>> Your legal defense does recieve money, as is any monitary judgements being paid on
    >>>>>> your behalf. So if your on the street pandering for a dollar, or you permit some to
    >>>>>> pander for that dollar on your behalf it is considered income. Your accountants can
    >>>>>> argue the arms lenght it did not go into my bank account, even though the soliciations
    >>>>>> use your name, and the purpose. You should know Sandra Tyson as she was one of the
    >>>>>> individuals pleading for help from these chat room relief groups. Maybe she could
    >>>>>> have benefited from one of those solicited dollars. She, and Frank, and Mary and
    >>>>>> others were trying to find the first 10 years benefits of the mold is gold melodrama.
    >>>>>> Prior to the Chamber of Commerce you wanted your house on the Lake fixed, placed in
    >>>>>> the same shape as it was before. You wanted to have public record of your daugher's
    >>>>>> health issues attributed from the generated mold. You wanted compensation for your
    >>>>>> and their pain and suffering. The Chamber of Commerce was only a party to the mold is
    >>>>>> gold melodrama when inspectors started cooking the mold. Ask any knowlegable
    >>>>>> inspectors. The Chamber used influence to reduce their members liability, mold has
    >>>>>> been added as an additional coverage, or removed from policies for years. ACHEMMIC
    >>>>>> and other groups are just trying to get numbers of minimum exposure so it justifies
    >>>>>> their business profit for having the government on their side. Even on hazadous waste
    >>>>>> site's for know PEL's the government is broke. You won't stop junk sceince until your
    >>>>>> groups start publishing it; you can't get the government onboard, and can't get your
    >>>>>> people in government positions. With the census, and statistics were a nation of
    >>>>>> numbers. There are no lives at stake! There are no numbers of deaths attributed to
    >>>>>> mold! There was a person "Sandra Tyson" who thought she would be the "one" to bear
    >>>>>> the proof; but you and your groups dismissed her. She and Frank, Mary have provided
    >>>>>> enough information to be given the opportunity to be counted as one of those
    >>>>>> statistics but they got ignored, or mistreated with the mold cure prescribed by some
    >>>>>> of these experts that are spreading their brand of junk science.
    >>>>>> jc

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.