Re: ACHK cough

More | Report Post

JC,

Wow! Where exactly is the great water front mansion I use to own? I seem to have misplaced it.

Can you send me pictures so I know what to look for?

I think you must have a dillusional fixation on what the lives of all people from Ole Miss are like.

Fiddle dee dee. I am going to have to think about this one another day.

Now: back to what is important stuff to be put on ToxLaw and shared among websites in order to stop
a deception in health marketing (agnotology) from occurring in our courts:

http://katysexposure.wordpress.com/2010/08/03/arizona-appellate-court-defines-outrageous-behavior-
and-then-proceeds-to-practice-it-just-like-the-san-diego-courts-have-for-five-years-over-the-same-
issues-fraud-in-health-marketing-by-the-us/

On 8/12/10, Deborah wrote:
> JC,
>
> You know perfectly well that people die from fungal infections, for you to suggest otherwise is
> deliberately deceitful. The science has been surpressed for so long that when I asked 4 doctors
> back in 2001 if it were possible to have a fungal infection of the sinus, they all said, "NO"
> immediately and unequivocally; 2 were ENTs. Were they lying or incompetent and does it matter
> which if you are the person suffering?
>
> Shame on you.
>
>
> http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/dkp507
>
> On 8/12/10, johncodie wrote:
>> On 8/12/10, Sharon wrote:
>>> JC
>>>
>>> Like I said you assume facts not in evidence in your hypotheses which causes your conclusions
>>> to be incorrect based on the false assumptions.
>>
>> The facts are the photographs of your home, RV, Pool, Aerial Satellite square footage of your
>> dwelling, and the price of a square foot of prime waterfront property. A half millon wouldn't
>> have been enough to make you whole. You know the term location, location, location; and where
>> you presently live just would not compare. Park the RV at the husbands business, and the boat
>> gets stored a someone's storage. For a Rancho Santa Fe property you downsized, nice but not
>> what you had come accoustomed. What ever else got used up on starting a mold is gold campaign
>> that has you embroiled in a continuing legal drain of funds.
>>
>> Not intrested in your personal life because you are a public figure for mold, and you don't
>> qualify for a personal life status anymore. Your still the same stuborn adolecence that never
>> learned to fold a losing hand. Date Ole Miss? Thats a hoot, even though they have are
>> deversified and lost the rebel mascot, the intelligent quotient there, wouldn't support a
>> decent conversation. Get back on topic! Why would a person die from mold? How many funerals
>> have you attended from those lost to the green, black fungus? It's only happening in your
> mind
>> becauses someone put it in print, and you like to copy and paste the news of a popensity to
>> harm.
>>
>> jc
>>
>>>
>>> 1. My house was under 2000 sf. It was a beautiful little gem. But small. Got more than
>>> enough had I been inclined to remodel from top to bottom.
>>>
>>> Not even going to bother with the rest. Why are you always so interested in my personal
>>> life? Are you sure I didn't turn you down for a date or something at your favorite
>>> university in the whole world - Ole Miss?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/12/10, johncodie wrote:
>>>> On 8/12/10, Sharon wrote:
>>>>> JC,
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. I received close to a half a million dollar settlement in my private litigation of 8
>>>>> years ago. More than enough to get my old house fixed if I was so inclined to do so.
>>>>
>>>> A half a millon doesn't come close to replacing a house that size, not even close to the
>>>> amount orginaly awarded to your freind Ms Ballard. You left the house and moved into town
>>>> closer to your husbands business and have ravine and walking path in place of a lake view.
>>>> No pool where you had a pool, and no place to park that big RV,or dock the boat. I know
>>>> those prices you tried to get in Rancho Sante Fe, those were in the millons. You settled
>>>> for what you could get so have the attorneys paid.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. People made contributions to my legal defense fund Because I was the first to
>>>>> publicly write of the deception of the US Chamber of Commerce's marketing campaign for
>>>>> the courts in the writing in question. It is kind of important to shut this down. Five
>>>>> years later, the case is still in the courts and will continue in the courts until this
>>>>> stopped as it is harming MANY.
>>>>
>>>> People made request for your legal defense fund because your actions resulted in a
>>>> judgement your still trying to get out of, which benefited Thrasher, and Shoemaker; who
>>>> depended on you to get the winds blowing in their direction as being a solution to mold
>>>> related problems. It's not the Chambers paper or the opposing view paper that is harming
>>>> anybody. You got yourself into a political tail spin and can't get out with your dignity
>>>> intact. There are no mold people being found with toxins. None.
>>>>>
>>>>> 3. There is no monitary judgement being paid on my behalf. Quit making stuff up, John!
>>>>
>>>> There is a judgement and it is costing you dearly. You might not have had to cut back on
>>>> the number of packs of cigarrettes you smoke but it is a drain. Can you go another 5
>>>> years?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 4. I'm sorry. I don't know Sandra Tyson but do know thousands of others pleading for
>>>>> help. Shutting down the deceit of the Chamber will help stop this.
>>>>
>>>> You should know Sandra Tyson, you should Frank, you should know Mary; they were the grass
>>>> roots supporting your cause. The Chamber is a personal issue of which you picked the
>>>> battle. It had no bearing on Sandra Tyson.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 5. I left ACHEMMIC. I can't speak for what they do or do not do.
>>>>
>>>> Why do good people put their name on a petetion, or join a political group when they don't
>>>> know what they do or not do. At your national level of recognition don't you think you
>>>> should be sure of an association before put your name with theirs.
>>>>>
>>>>> 6. You still sound bitter that all did not go well for you 10 years ago and if things did
>>>>> not go well for you, then they should not go well for anyone else. Wrong attitude for
>>>>> one to live their life by.
>>>>
>>>> Things did go exceptionaly well for us, we avoided having our nest egg washed away with
>>>> Katrinia, We were able to place the children in private school, and an ivy league collage.
>>>> We are thus far avoiding the massive layoffs not seen for 36 years. I can play golf or
>>>> tennis with the children, where once I was looking for fuel to heat the home. Your
>>>> settlement was two years prior to our settlement; so no the M. Ballard mold is gold rush
>>>> wasn't used as it had no bearing. Two honest men set the sights for the litigation of
>>>> breach of contract, not mold. It was really never an issue. The Chamber of Commerce Paper
>>>> has no influence when the court takes all evidence at face value. Find the people that are
>>>> covered in mold and that is your beginning. The mold era is over, even if your case hasn't
>>>> been dismissed.
>>>>
>>>> jc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sharon
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/12/10, johncodie wrote:
>>>>>> On 8/11/10, Sharon wrote:
>>>>>>> No. I don't know anyone named Sandra Tyson. And I do not generate income from this
>>>>>>> issue - as you WELL KNOW - while promoting or not promoting ACHEMMIC's or anyone
>>>>>>> else's agenda. No. I am not concerned about being a "noteworthy cyber space figure
>>>>>>> of respect". If I was, I certainly wouldn't be participating in this nonsense on a
>>>>>>> public forum with you!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is what I want and what I have ALWAYS wanted: I was the deception of the US
>>>>>>> Chamber of Commerce et al, over this issue that it has been scientifically proven
>>>>>> all
>>>>>>> claims of mold induced illness are only being made because of "trial lawyers, media
>>>>>>> and Junk Science" G-O-N-E from public health policy. That's it. That is all I want
>>>>>>> and I will not be stopping until I get it. Can't. Too many lives at stake.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your legal defense does recieve money, as is any monitary judgements being paid on
>>>>>> your behalf. So if your on the street pandering for a dollar, or you permit some to
>>>>>> pander for that dollar on your behalf it is considered income. Your accountants can
>>>>>> argue the arms lenght it did not go into my bank account, even though the soliciations
>>>>>> use your name, and the purpose. You should know Sandra Tyson as she was one of the
>>>>>> individuals pleading for help from these chat room relief groups. Maybe she could
>>>>>> have benefited from one of those solicited dollars. She, and Frank, and Mary and
>>>>>> others were trying to find the first 10 years benefits of the mold is gold melodrama.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Prior to the Chamber of Commerce you wanted your house on the Lake fixed, placed in
>>>>>> the same shape as it was before. You wanted to have public record of your daugher's
>>>>>> health issues attributed from the generated mold. You wanted compensation for your
>>>>>> and their pain and suffering. The Chamber of Commerce was only a party to the mold is
>>>>>> gold melodrama when inspectors started cooking the mold. Ask any knowlegable
>>>>>> inspectors. The Chamber used influence to reduce their members liability, mold has
>>>>>> been added as an additional coverage, or removed from policies for years. ACHEMMIC
>>>>>> and other groups are just trying to get numbers of minimum exposure so it justifies
>>>>>> their business profit for having the government on their side. Even on hazadous waste
>>>>>> site's for know PEL's the government is broke. You won't stop junk sceince until your
>>>>>> groups start publishing it; you can't get the government onboard, and can't get your
>>>>>> people in government positions. With the census, and statistics were a nation of
>>>>>> numbers. There are no lives at stake! There are no numbers of deaths attributed to
>>>>>> mold! There was a person "Sandra Tyson" who thought she would be the "one" to bear
>>>>>> the proof; but you and your groups dismissed her. She and Frank, Mary have provided
>>>>>> enough information to be given the opportunity to be counted as one of those
>>>>>> statistics but they got ignored, or mistreated with the mold cure prescribed by some
>>>>>> of these experts that are spreading their brand of junk science.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> jc