Re: VIDEO~MOLD Toyota Workers File Complaint w/San Diego DA
Posted by Sharon on 9/07/10
Libel law is really quite simple. Truth is your best defense...and one cannot use
criminal perjury to establish a fictional reason for personal malice to be used
to "legally" prove they were falsely accused of criminal perjury, with malice.
On 9/07/10, Mike B. wrote:
> You're the only one who doesn't understand that your litigation with Kelman is
> over. When you have to argue your own appeal (pro se) because you have no
> attorneys, then your case is over. You're just waiting on the "obituary" from the
> appellate court.
> On the other points in your comment below, you're totally wrong.
> On 9/03/10, Sharon wrote:
>> Mike B,
>> I would believe that you have been a litigant for over 20 years. Makes sense.
>> But there is no way you have been in the legal profession for 20 years and don't
>> know what strategic litigation means. You keep wrongfully assuming my
>> with Kelman is over. Why is that? Its still in the courts.
>> On 9/03/10, Mike B. wrote:
>>> I've been in the legal profession for over 20 years and have never heard of
>>> this phenomenon. Tell me, how is it the "strategic litigator" is guaranteed
>>> success in the court? How did Kelman "strategically litigate" his victory over
>>> you? Were the judges in on the deal with Kelman?
>>> You're absurd.
>>> On 9/01/10, Sharon wrote:
>>>> Mie B,
>>>> Strategic litigation is the process of abusing the judicial process for the
>>>> purpose of gaining unfair atvantage in a related matter of grater
>>>> significance to the strategic litigator. It can come in many forms that
>>>> typically encompass some sort of charater assasination of one who stands in
>>>> the way of achieving the matter deemed to be of greater signifance to the
>>>> strategic litigator.
>>>> Nope. No rebutal from Kelman et al.
Posts on this thread, including this one