Re: VIDEO~MOLD Toyota Workers File Complaint w/San Diego DA

More | Report Post

You're dense and there's no getting past that hurdle.

My statement clearly says "I'm not a lawyer"; yours does not.

My statement says, based upon the fact I'm not a lawyer, I am making statements based upon my
belief. Yours matter-of-factly states what the libel law is, and how to apply it.

You're guilty; I'm not.

On 9/08/10, Sharon wrote:
> Mike B,
>
> You write:
>
> "I'm not a lawyer, but I believe I am correct when I say that you only have a right to
> appear in proper person before a court and in a case in which you are a party or
> intervenor. But, publicly dispensing legal advice and interpretations of the law on a
> medium like this is entirely inappropriate and illegal."
>
> Really? Well then you better stop publicly dispensing legal advice and interpretations of
the
> law on a medium like this, as is illustrated above.
>
> Sharon
>
>
> On 9/08/10, Mike B. wrote:
>> I'm not a lawyer, but I believe I am correct when I say that you only have a right to
>> appear in proper person before a court and in a case in which you are a party or
>> intervenor. But, publicly dispensing legal advice and interpretations of the law on a
>> medium like this is entirely inappropriate and illegal.
>>
>> If the moderator of this board is a member of the ABA and a state bar association, s/he
>> has a duty to report you and your admission of practicing law without a license.
>>
>> You may have just done yourself in, Sharon Kramer.
>>
>> On 9/08/10, Sharon wrote:
>>> "I think you have just practiced law without a license." Of course I have as is my
>>> right guranteed to me under the Constitution. Its called Properia Persona.
>>>
>>> I think you have just illustrated why you do not disclose your true identity as you post
>>> your words of whiz-dumb on this board.
>>>
>>> Sharon
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/07/10, Mike B. wrote:
>>>> I think you have just practiced law without a license.
>>>>
>>>> I also posted more on the subject, but my comment was "logged and sent to the
>>>> adminstrator for review" for some unexplained reason.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/07/10, Sharon wrote:
>>>>> Libel law is really quite simple. Truth is your best defense...and one cannot use
>>>>> criminal perjury to establish a fictional reason for personal malice to be used
>>>>> to "legally" prove they were falsely accused of criminal perjury, with malice.
>>>>>