Re: VIDEO~MOLD Toyota Workers File Complaint w/San Diego DA
Posted by Sharon on 9/09/10
Mike B, Goofy comments...at best On 9/09/10, Mike B. wrote: > You're dense and there's no getting past that hurdle. > > My statement clearly says "I'm not a lawyer"; yours does not. > > My statement says, based upon the fact I'm not a lawyer, I am making statements based upon my > belief. Yours matter-of-factly states what the libel law is, and how to apply it. > > You're guilty; I'm not. > > > > On 9/08/10, Sharon wrote: >> Mike B, >> >> You write: >> >> "I'm not a lawyer, but I believe I am correct when I say that you only have a right to >> appear in proper person before a court and in a case in which you are a party or >> intervenor. But, publicly dispensing legal advice and interpretations of the law on a >> medium like this is entirely inappropriate and illegal." >> >> Really? Well then you better stop publicly dispensing legal advice and interpretations of > the >> law on a medium like this, as is illustrated above. >> >> Sharon >> >> >> On 9/08/10, Mike B. wrote: >>> I'm not a lawyer, but I believe I am correct when I say that you only have a right to >>> appear in proper person before a court and in a case in which you are a party or >>> intervenor. But, publicly dispensing legal advice and interpretations of the law on a >>> medium like this is entirely inappropriate and illegal. >>> >>> If the moderator of this board is a member of the ABA and a state bar association, s/he >>> has a duty to report you and your admission of practicing law without a license. >>> >>> You may have just done yourself in, Sharon Kramer. >>> >>> On 9/08/10, Sharon wrote: >>>> "I think you have just practiced law without a license." Of course I have as is my >>>> right guranteed to me under the Constitution. Its called Properia Persona. >>>> >>>> I think you have just illustrated why you do not disclose your true identity as you post >>>> your words of whiz-dumb on this board. >>>> >>>> Sharon >>>> >>>> >>>> On 9/07/10, Mike B. wrote: >>>>> I think you have just practiced law without a license. >>>>> >>>>> I also posted more on the subject, but my comment was "logged and sent to the >>>>> adminstrator for review" for some unexplained reason. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 9/07/10, Sharon wrote: >>>>>> Libel law is really quite simple. Truth is your best defense...and one cannot use >>>>>> criminal perjury to establish a fictional reason for personal malice to be used >>>>>> to "legally" prove they were falsely accused of criminal perjury, with malice. >>>>>>
Posts on this thread, including this one
|