Re: court of Appeal Upholds Libel Verdict Against Mold Activ
Posted by Sharon Kramer on 9/19/10
You write: "what public should fear are misguided activists who
blindly attack, disparage, and intimidate others in an effort to
distort the truth."
My point exactly. That is why I refuse to be silenced until the
pseudo-science of the US Chamber -that all claims of illness from
the toxins of mold are only being made because of 'trial lawyers,
media, and junk science'- is erradicated from US public health
policy and the courts. Too many lives are at stake for the
Chamber's bullying activists to continue with this charade.
Eventually, the truth of the matter will be settled, that you don't
treat people like this in the United States of America.
On 9/19/10, Rem Dude wrote:
> No, what public should fear are misguided activists who blindly
> attack, disparage, and intimidate others in an effort to distort
> the truth.
> Self-importance begets insignificance. At the end of the day,
> you’re alone howling at the moon and no one is listening or
> On 9/18/10, Sharon wrote:
>> You mean people should fear retribution for speaking out and
>> exposing of a deception in US public health policy that harms
>> the lives of many?
>> Is that the lesson you think is good in America?
>> Forget it. Will not be silenced until the environmental
>> science of the US Chamber is removed from health policy and
>> courts. Too many lives at stake and too many may fear
>> out in the future.
>> On 9/17/10, Rem Dude wrote:
>>> An excellent lesson for those who attack, disparage and
>>> Court costs too - ouch!
>>> On 9/16/10, sangamon811 wrote:
>>>> I am from Veritox, and for persons who have been following
>>>> issues related to Dr. Kelman, I thought you would be
>>>> interested in this recent court ruling:
>>>> Court of Appeal Upholds Libel Verdict Against Mold
>>>> Ruling affirms 2008 ruling that Dr. Bruce Kelman,
>>>> President of Veritox, was victim of defamation
>>>> SEATTLE (September 16, 2010) – The California Court of
>>>> Appeal this week affirmed the judgment in favor of Dr.
>>>> Bruce Kelman of Veritox®, Inc., determining that Dr. Bruce
>>>> Kelman was libeled by activist Sharon Kramer. In a
>>>> unanimous opinion, Division One of the Fourth Appellate
>>>> District upheld the jury’s verdict in Dr. Kelman’s favor
>>>> and also ordered Kramer to pay costs to Dr. Kelman.
>>>> The Court upheld the 2008 verdict by a San Diego County
>>>> Superior Court jury that found. Kramer libeled Dr. Kelman
>>>> when she published a press release in March 2005 stating
>>>> that Dr. Kelman had altered his under-oath statements on
>>>> the witness stand when he testified as a witness in an
>>>> Oregon lawsuit. The jury found that Kramer’s statement was
>>>> false and defamatory and that she had published it with
>>>> In addition to upholding the 2008 ruling, the appellate
>>>> court affirmed the trial court’s award of costs to Dr.
>>>> Kelman, and also found that he was entitled to recover
>>>> costs on appeal.
Posts on this thread, including this one