Posted by Deborah on 10/01/10
Listen, tool, if you are the Mike B who was my former landlord
who gassed my child and me, then you obviously gone back to
school. As for being well known around "these parts", not by
any you've mentioned and not by you or your wife, but your
direct negligence is well-documented as is your tampering with a
public utility, false cause of action and lying on the witness
stand. Plenty of other stuff, too.
You allude to things about me w/o providing any specifics or
proof that could be countered or rebutted. No one on this board
would be fooled by it, you are only fooling yourself. As for
your calling me a homewrecker, that is laughable and easily
disproved so you are either a fool or being misled by whomever
is giving you information. I suggest you check your sources.
I'd put my reputation up against yours any day and any time.
What did you say your real name was? I have a hard time
believing you are the real Mike B(ecnel) as even he couldn't be
this stupid. There is no way he, or anyone associated with what
happened, would want this brought up, but I could go and run it
by the judge who presided over the matter, that might prove
interesting and I might just have to do it.
I don't know you or your wife, but please post more, this is
amusing. What is it that I haven't shared? Are you so sure
that others on this board don't know all the details of my
"life"; how would you know if I hadn't shared it with them
privately or if they had the means to verify it for themselves?
Yes, you are a tool, a dull one, but a tool none the less.
On 10/01/10, Mike B. wrote:
> Listen closely Deborah - until you called me
a "tool", I was
> happy to ignore your tasteless and malicious attacks on me
> throughout my discussions with Sharon Kramer.
> Your history and lifestyle around these parts is well known.
> Being called a "homewrecker" is the least of your problems.
> Whatever psudo-lawyer you've been able to consult will soon
> learn you're the offensive lump in the punch bowl.
> BTW - my wife couldn't care less about you. She, too, knows
> your true background and what you haven't "shared" with the
> people on this and other sites.
> On 9/30/10, Deborah wrote:
>> Well, Mike B., guess that is libel. Isn't it? Or at least
>> an attempt at it. Like I said, I am still waiting for you
>> to give details on this.
>> You are a piece of work, aren't you?
>> This is a board to discuss mold litigation and tangential,
>> relevant issues. How is your attempt at libeling me
>> relevant here? More importantly, how is ANYTHING you post
>> here relevant?
Posts on this thread, including this one