Re: Libel

More | Report Post

You're wrong on all counts. That's why you lost the Kelman
lawsuit against you for shooting your mouth off, and now have to
pay the costs of the trial and the appeal.

So much for your credibility.

On 10/01/10, Sharon wrote:
> Enough, Mike B. It is no secret you started posting on this
> board, not because you care of environmental issues, but
> because you have been Hell bent to harass Deborah.
>
> You have gone beyond poor taste. Stop.
>
>
> On 10/01/10, Mike B. wrote:
>> Listen closely Deborah - until you called me a "tool", I was
>> happy to ignore your tasteless and malicious attacks on me
>> throughout my discussions with Sharon Kramer.
>>
>> Your history and lifestyle around these parts is well known.
>> Being called a "homewrecker" is the least of your problems.
>> Whatever psudo-lawyer you've been able to consult will soon
>> learn you're the offensive lump in the punch bowl.
>>
>> BTW - my wife couldn't care less about you. She, too, knows
>> your true background and what you haven't "shared" with the
>> people on this and other sites.
>>
>>
>> On 9/30/10, Deborah wrote:
>>> Well, Mike B., guess that is libel. Isn't it? Or at least
>>> an attempt at it. Like I said, I am still waiting for you
>>> to give details on this.
>>>
>>> You are a piece of work, aren't you?
>>> This is a board to discuss mold litigation and tangential,
>>> relevant issues. How is your attempt at libeling me
>>> relevant here? More importantly, how is ANYTHING you post
>>> here relevant?