Re: Libel

More | Report Post

Please go to the judge, the clerk of court, the DA (a Sharon
loser strategy), or your local priest. You are exactly what
Sharon will/has become - an embittered loser who will spew your
pathetic story to whomever will listen. Everybody is wrong
except the 2 of you. Imagine that.

Nobody gassed you or your child except you and your bad habits.
Take responsibility for what you have done to yourself! You're
not anyone that others should take seriously regarding
environmental and toxic tort matters. IMHO, you're hysterical.

On 10/01/10, Deborah wrote:
> Listen, tool, if you are the Mike B who was my former landlord
> who gassed my child and me, then you obviously gone back to
> school. As for being well known around "these parts", not by
> any you've mentioned and not by you or your wife, but your
> direct negligence is well-documented as is your tampering with
a
> public utility, false cause of action and lying on the witness
> stand. Plenty of other stuff, too.
>
> You allude to things about me w/o providing any specifics or
> proof that could be countered or rebutted. No one on this board
> would be fooled by it, you are only fooling yourself. As for
> your calling me a homewrecker, that is laughable and easily
> disproved so you are either a fool or being misled by whomever
> is giving you information. I suggest you check your sources.
>
> I'd put my reputation up against yours any day and any time.
> What did you say your real name was? I have a hard time
> believing you are the real Mike B(ecnel) as even he couldn't be
> this stupid. There is no way he, or anyone associated with
what
> happened, would want this brought up, but I could go and run it
> by the judge who presided over the matter, that might prove
> interesting and I might just have to do it.
>
> I don't know you or your wife, but please post more, this is
> amusing. What is it that I haven't shared? Are you so sure
> that others on this board don't know all the details of my
> "life"; how would you know if I hadn't shared it with them
> privately or if they had the means to verify it for themselves?
>
> Yes, you are a tool, a dull one, but a tool none the less.
>
>
> On 10/01/10, Mike B. wrote:
>> Listen closely Deborah - until you called me
>
> a "tool", I was
>> happy to ignore your tasteless and malicious attacks on me
>> throughout my discussions with Sharon Kramer.
>>
>> Your history and lifestyle around these parts is well known.
>> Being called a "homewrecker" is the least of your problems.
>> Whatever psudo-lawyer you've been able to consult will soon
>> learn you're the offensive lump in the punch bowl.
>>
>> BTW - my wife couldn't care less about you. She, too, knows
>> your true background and what you haven't "shared" with the
>> people on this and other sites.
>>
>>
>> On 9/30/10, Deborah wrote:
>>> Well, Mike B., guess that is libel. Isn't it? Or at least
>>> an attempt at it. Like I said, I am still waiting for you
>>> to give details on this.
>>>
>>> You are a piece of work, aren't you?
>>> This is a board to discuss mold litigation and tangential,
>>> relevant issues. How is your attempt at libeling me
>>> relevant here? More importantly, how is ANYTHING you post
>>> here relevant?