Follow us!

    Re: Libel

    Posted by Deborah on 10/02/10

    Daniel Becnel said not related to Michael E Becnel and that he didn't
    even know him, and he put it in writing.

    Fannie Mae ever follow up on your purchases?

    On 10/01/10, Mike B. wrote:
    > You "mentioned" this archaic BS years ago. You don't scare me with
    > your inuendo about lawyers, judges and whatever else goes through
    > your addled mind.
    > Since when does "relative" equal "brother"? That just proves the
    > point that you and Sharon hear what you want to hear, and don't
    > actually "listen" to what's being said. Who or what do you blame
    > for that disability?
    > On 10/01/10, Deborah wrote:
    >> Sharon,
    >> Did I mention that I'd finally had a response from Daniel Becnel,
    >> the attorney? He stated, unequivocally, that the Mike Becnel I
    >> leased an apartment from was not his brother, that he had no idea
    >> who he was and had never met him.
    >> This is odd because the Mike Becnel that was my landlord tried to
    >> get me to believe Daniel, or "Danny", as he referred to him, was
    >> his relative. Several attorneys made that assumption, too.
    >> Perhaps ol' Mike B was just "spinning" things to intimidate any
    >> potential ally I might find. Hmmm. Thanks for reminding me of
    >> that. I might have to contact an attorney after all.
    >> Thanks, Sharon, it does seem Mike B joined here for the sole
    >> purpose of harassing me. "It" refers to discussions it was
    > having
    >> w/ you. Did I miss that? I saw no discussion, only sophomoric
    >> and ad hominem attacks whenever you post, especially updates on
    >> your case.
    >> On 10/01/10, Sharon wrote:
    >>> Enough, Mike B. It is no secret you started posting on this
    >>> board, not because you care of environmental issues, but
    >>> because you have been Hell bent to harass Deborah.
    >>> You have gone beyond poor taste. Stop.
    >>> On 10/01/10, Mike B. wrote:
    >>>> Listen closely Deborah - until you called me a "tool", I was
    >>>> happy to ignore your tasteless and malicious attacks on me
    >>>> throughout my discussions with Sharon Kramer.
    >>>> Your history and lifestyle around these parts is well known.
    >>>> Being called a "homewrecker" is the least of your problems.
    >>>> Whatever psudo-lawyer you've been able to consult will soon
    >>>> learn you're the offensive lump in the punch bowl.
    >>>> BTW - my wife couldn't care less about you. She, too, knows
    >>>> your true background and what you haven't "shared" with the
    >>>> people on this and other sites.
    >>>> On 9/30/10, Deborah wrote:
    >>>>> Well, Mike B., guess that is libel. Isn't it? Or at least
    >>>>> an attempt at it. Like I said, I am still waiting for you
    >>>>> to give details on this.
    >>>>> You are a piece of work, aren't you?
    >>>>> This is a board to discuss mold litigation and tangential,
    >>>>> relevant issues. How is your attempt at libeling me
    >>>>> relevant here? More importantly, how is ANYTHING you post
    >>>>> here relevant?

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.