Posted by Deborah on 10/02/10
Daniel Becnel said not related to Michael E Becnel and that he didn't
even know him, and he put it in writing.
Fannie Mae ever follow up on your purchases?
On 10/01/10, Mike B. wrote:
> You "mentioned" this archaic BS years ago. You don't scare me with
> your inuendo about lawyers, judges and whatever else goes through
> your addled mind.
> Since when does "relative" equal "brother"? That just proves the
> point that you and Sharon hear what you want to hear, and don't
> actually "listen" to what's being said. Who or what do you blame
> for that disability?
> On 10/01/10, Deborah wrote:
>> Did I mention that I'd finally had a response from Daniel Becnel,
>> the attorney? He stated, unequivocally, that the Mike Becnel I
>> leased an apartment from was not his brother, that he had no idea
>> who he was and had never met him.
>> This is odd because the Mike Becnel that was my landlord tried to
>> get me to believe Daniel, or "Danny", as he referred to him, was
>> his relative. Several attorneys made that assumption, too.
>> Perhaps ol' Mike B was just "spinning" things to intimidate any
>> potential ally I might find. Hmmm. Thanks for reminding me of
>> that. I might have to contact an attorney after all.
>> Thanks, Sharon, it does seem Mike B joined here for the sole
>> purpose of harassing me. "It" refers to discussions it was
>> w/ you. Did I miss that? I saw no discussion, only sophomoric
>> and ad hominem attacks whenever you post, especially updates on
>> your case.
>> On 10/01/10, Sharon wrote:
>>> Enough, Mike B. It is no secret you started posting on this
>>> board, not because you care of environmental issues, but
>>> because you have been Hell bent to harass Deborah.
>>> You have gone beyond poor taste. Stop.
>>> On 10/01/10, Mike B. wrote:
>>>> Listen closely Deborah - until you called me a "tool", I was
>>>> happy to ignore your tasteless and malicious attacks on me
>>>> throughout my discussions with Sharon Kramer.
>>>> Your history and lifestyle around these parts is well known.
>>>> Being called a "homewrecker" is the least of your problems.
>>>> Whatever psudo-lawyer you've been able to consult will soon
>>>> learn you're the offensive lump in the punch bowl.
>>>> BTW - my wife couldn't care less about you. She, too, knows
>>>> your true background and what you haven't "shared" with the
>>>> people on this and other sites.
>>>> On 9/30/10, Deborah wrote:
>>>>> Well, Mike B., guess that is libel. Isn't it? Or at least
>>>>> an attempt at it. Like I said, I am still waiting for you
>>>>> to give details on this.
>>>>> You are a piece of work, aren't you?
>>>>> This is a board to discuss mold litigation and tangential,
>>>>> relevant issues. How is your attempt at libeling me
>>>>> relevant here? More importantly, how is ANYTHING you post
>>>>> here relevant?
Posts on this thread, including this one