Follow us!

    Re: Libel

    Posted by Deborah on 10/03/10

    Perhaps I should ask Daniel Becnel to look at this? He might be very

    On 10/02/10, Deborah wrote:
    > Daniel Becnel said not related to Michael E Becnel and that he didn't
    > even know him, and he put it in writing.
    > Fannie Mae ever follow up on your purchases?
    > On 10/01/10, Mike B. wrote:
    >> You "mentioned" this archaic BS years ago. You don't scare me with
    >> your inuendo about lawyers, judges and whatever else goes through
    >> your addled mind.
    >> Since when does "relative" equal "brother"? That just proves the
    >> point that you and Sharon hear what you want to hear, and don't
    >> actually "listen" to what's being said. Who or what do you blame
    >> for that disability?
    >> On 10/01/10, Deborah wrote:
    >>> Sharon,
    >>> Did I mention that I'd finally had a response from Daniel Becnel,
    >>> the attorney? He stated, unequivocally, that the Mike Becnel I
    >>> leased an apartment from was not his brother, that he had no idea
    >>> who he was and had never met him.
    >>> This is odd because the Mike Becnel that was my landlord tried to
    >>> get me to believe Daniel, or "Danny", as he referred to him, was
    >>> his relative. Several attorneys made that assumption, too.
    >>> Perhaps ol' Mike B was just "spinning" things to intimidate any
    >>> potential ally I might find. Hmmm. Thanks for reminding me of
    >>> that. I might have to contact an attorney after all.
    >>> Thanks, Sharon, it does seem Mike B joined here for the sole
    >>> purpose of harassing me. "It" refers to discussions it was
    >> having
    >>> w/ you. Did I miss that? I saw no discussion, only sophomoric
    >>> and ad hominem attacks whenever you post, especially updates on
    >>> your case.
    >>> On 10/01/10, Sharon wrote:
    >>>> Enough, Mike B. It is no secret you started posting on this
    >>>> board, not because you care of environmental issues, but
    >>>> because you have been Hell bent to harass Deborah.
    >>>> You have gone beyond poor taste. Stop.
    >>>> On 10/01/10, Mike B. wrote:
    >>>>> Listen closely Deborah - until you called me a "tool", I was
    >>>>> happy to ignore your tasteless and malicious attacks on me
    >>>>> throughout my discussions with Sharon Kramer.
    >>>>> Your history and lifestyle around these parts is well known.
    >>>>> Being called a "homewrecker" is the least of your problems.
    >>>>> Whatever psudo-lawyer you've been able to consult will soon
    >>>>> learn you're the offensive lump in the punch bowl.
    >>>>> BTW - my wife couldn't care less about you. She, too, knows
    >>>>> your true background and what you haven't "shared" with the
    >>>>> people on this and other sites.
    >>>>> On 9/30/10, Deborah wrote:
    >>>>>> Well, Mike B., guess that is libel. Isn't it? Or at least
    >>>>>> an attempt at it. Like I said, I am still waiting for you
    >>>>>> to give details on this.
    >>>>>> You are a piece of work, aren't you?
    >>>>>> This is a board to discuss mold litigation and tangential,
    >>>>>> relevant issues. How is your attempt at libeling me
    >>>>>> relevant here? More importantly, how is ANYTHING you post
    >>>>>> here relevant?

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.