Re: Libel

More | Report Post

Perhaps I should ask Daniel Becnel to look at this? He might be very
interested.

On 10/02/10, Deborah wrote:
> Daniel Becnel said not related to Michael E Becnel and that he didn't
> even know him, and he put it in writing.
>
> Fannie Mae ever follow up on your purchases?
>
>
> On 10/01/10, Mike B. wrote:
>> You "mentioned" this archaic BS years ago. You don't scare me with
>> your inuendo about lawyers, judges and whatever else goes through
>> your addled mind.
>>
>> Since when does "relative" equal "brother"? That just proves the
>> point that you and Sharon hear what you want to hear, and don't
>> actually "listen" to what's being said. Who or what do you blame
>> for that disability?
>>
>>
>> On 10/01/10, Deborah wrote:
>>> Sharon,
>>>
>>> Did I mention that I'd finally had a response from Daniel Becnel,
>>> the attorney? He stated, unequivocally, that the Mike Becnel I
>>> leased an apartment from was not his brother, that he had no idea
>>> who he was and had never met him.
>>>
>>> This is odd because the Mike Becnel that was my landlord tried to
>>> get me to believe Daniel, or "Danny", as he referred to him, was
>>> his relative. Several attorneys made that assumption, too.
>>> Perhaps ol' Mike B was just "spinning" things to intimidate any
>>> potential ally I might find. Hmmm. Thanks for reminding me of
>>> that. I might have to contact an attorney after all.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Sharon, it does seem Mike B joined here for the sole
>>> purpose of harassing me. "It" refers to discussions it was
>> having
>>> w/ you. Did I miss that? I saw no discussion, only sophomoric
>>> and ad hominem attacks whenever you post, especially updates on
>>> your case.
>>>
>>> On 10/01/10, Sharon wrote:
>>>> Enough, Mike B. It is no secret you started posting on this
>>>> board, not because you care of environmental issues, but
>>>> because you have been Hell bent to harass Deborah.
>>>>
>>>> You have gone beyond poor taste. Stop.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10/01/10, Mike B. wrote:
>>>>> Listen closely Deborah - until you called me a "tool", I was
>>>>> happy to ignore your tasteless and malicious attacks on me
>>>>> throughout my discussions with Sharon Kramer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your history and lifestyle around these parts is well known.
>>>>> Being called a "homewrecker" is the least of your problems.
>>>>> Whatever psudo-lawyer you've been able to consult will soon
>>>>> learn you're the offensive lump in the punch bowl.
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW - my wife couldn't care less about you. She, too, knows
>>>>> your true background and what you haven't "shared" with the
>>>>> people on this and other sites.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/30/10, Deborah wrote:
>>>>>> Well, Mike B., guess that is libel. Isn't it? Or at least
>>>>>> an attempt at it. Like I said, I am still waiting for you
>>>>>> to give details on this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are a piece of work, aren't you?
>>>>>> This is a board to discuss mold litigation and tangential,
>>>>>> relevant issues. How is your attempt at libeling me
>>>>>> relevant here? More importantly, how is ANYTHING you post
>>>>>> here relevant?