Re: Libel

More | Report Post

Yeah, why don't you do that Deborah. Tell Danny I said "hi" and I'm
really glad he lost the election to the court of appeals.

Yep, Fannie Mae came to vist me at my plantation a few months ago. She
and I are on good terms. Jealous?

On 10/03/10, Deborah wrote:
> Perhaps I should ask Daniel Becnel to look at this? He might be very
> interested.
>
> On 10/02/10, Deborah wrote:
>> Daniel Becnel said not related to Michael E Becnel and that he didn't
>> even know him, and he put it in writing.
>>
>> Fannie Mae ever follow up on your purchases?
>>
>>
>> On 10/01/10, Mike B. wrote:
>>> You "mentioned" this archaic BS years ago. You don't scare me with
>>> your inuendo about lawyers, judges and whatever else goes through
>>> your addled mind.
>>>
>>> Since when does "relative" equal "brother"? That just proves the
>>> point that you and Sharon hear what you want to hear, and don't
>>> actually "listen" to what's being said. Who or what do you blame
>>> for that disability?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/01/10, Deborah wrote:
>>>> Sharon,
>>>>
>>>> Did I mention that I'd finally had a response from Daniel Becnel,
>>>> the attorney? He stated, unequivocally, that the Mike Becnel I
>>>> leased an apartment from was not his brother, that he had no idea
>>>> who he was and had never met him.
>>>>
>>>> This is odd because the Mike Becnel that was my landlord tried to
>>>> get me to believe Daniel, or "Danny", as he referred to him, was
>>>> his relative. Several attorneys made that assumption, too.
>>>> Perhaps ol' Mike B was just "spinning" things to intimidate any
>>>> potential ally I might find. Hmmm. Thanks for reminding me of
>>>> that. I might have to contact an attorney after all.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, Sharon, it does seem Mike B joined here for the sole
>>>> purpose of harassing me. "It" refers to discussions it was
>>> having
>>>> w/ you. Did I miss that? I saw no discussion, only sophomoric
>>>> and ad hominem attacks whenever you post, especially updates on
>>>> your case.
>>>>
>>>> On 10/01/10, Sharon wrote:
>>>>> Enough, Mike B. It is no secret you started posting on this
>>>>> board, not because you care of environmental issues, but
>>>>> because you have been Hell bent to harass Deborah.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have gone beyond poor taste. Stop.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/01/10, Mike B. wrote:
>>>>>> Listen closely Deborah - until you called me a "tool", I was
>>>>>> happy to ignore your tasteless and malicious attacks on me
>>>>>> throughout my discussions with Sharon Kramer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your history and lifestyle around these parts is well known.
>>>>>> Being called a "homewrecker" is the least of your problems.
>>>>>> Whatever psudo-lawyer you've been able to consult will soon
>>>>>> learn you're the offensive lump in the punch bowl.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW - my wife couldn't care less about you. She, too, knows
>>>>>> your true background and what you haven't "shared" with the
>>>>>> people on this and other sites.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/30/10, Deborah wrote:
>>>>>>> Well, Mike B., guess that is libel. Isn't it? Or at least
>>>>>>> an attempt at it. Like I said, I am still waiting for you
>>>>>>> to give details on this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are a piece of work, aren't you?
>>>>>>> This is a board to discuss mold litigation and tangential,
>>>>>>> relevant issues. How is your attempt at libeling me
>>>>>>> relevant here? More importantly, how is ANYTHING you post
>>>>>>> here relevant?