Re: Libel

More | Report Post

Is this your relative too?
http://www.wafb.com/global/story.asp?s=7060621

On 10/04/10, Mike B. wrote:
> Yeah, why don't you do that Deborah. Tell Danny I said "hi" and I'm
> really glad he lost the election to the court of appeals.
>
> Yep, Fannie Mae came to vist me at my plantation a few months ago. She
> and I are on good terms. Jealous?
>
>
>
> On 10/03/10, Deborah wrote:
>> Perhaps I should ask Daniel Becnel to look at this? He might be very
>> interested.
>>
>> On 10/02/10, Deborah wrote:
>>> Daniel Becnel said not related to Michael E Becnel and that he didn't
>>> even know him, and he put it in writing.
>>>
>>> Fannie Mae ever follow up on your purchases?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/01/10, Mike B. wrote:
>>>> You "mentioned" this archaic BS years ago. You don't scare me with
>>>> your inuendo about lawyers, judges and whatever else goes through
>>>> your addled mind.
>>>>
>>>> Since when does "relative" equal "brother"? That just proves the
>>>> point that you and Sharon hear what you want to hear, and don't
>>>> actually "listen" to what's being said. Who or what do you blame
>>>> for that disability?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10/01/10, Deborah wrote:
>>>>> Sharon,
>>>>>
>>>>> Did I mention that I'd finally had a response from Daniel Becnel,
>>>>> the attorney? He stated, unequivocally, that the Mike Becnel I
>>>>> leased an apartment from was not his brother, that he had no idea
>>>>> who he was and had never met him.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is odd because the Mike Becnel that was my landlord tried to
>>>>> get me to believe Daniel, or "Danny", as he referred to him, was
>>>>> his relative. Several attorneys made that assumption, too.
>>>>> Perhaps ol' Mike B was just "spinning" things to intimidate any
>>>>> potential ally I might find. Hmmm. Thanks for reminding me of
>>>>> that. I might have to contact an attorney after all.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, Sharon, it does seem Mike B joined here for the sole
>>>>> purpose of harassing me. "It" refers to discussions it was
>>>> having
>>>>> w/ you. Did I miss that? I saw no discussion, only sophomoric
>>>>> and ad hominem attacks whenever you post, especially updates on
>>>>> your case.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/01/10, Sharon wrote:
>>>>>> Enough, Mike B. It is no secret you started posting on this
>>>>>> board, not because you care of environmental issues, but
>>>>>> because you have been Hell bent to harass Deborah.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have gone beyond poor taste. Stop.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/01/10, Mike B. wrote:
>>>>>>> Listen closely Deborah - until you called me a "tool", I was
>>>>>>> happy to ignore your tasteless and malicious attacks on me
>>>>>>> throughout my discussions with Sharon Kramer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your history and lifestyle around these parts is well known.
>>>>>>> Being called a "homewrecker" is the least of your problems.
>>>>>>> Whatever psudo-lawyer you've been able to consult will soon
>>>>>>> learn you're the offensive lump in the punch bowl.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW - my wife couldn't care less about you. She, too, knows
>>>>>>> your true background and what you haven't "shared" with the
>>>>>>> people on this and other sites.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/30/10, Deborah wrote:
>>>>>>>> Well, Mike B., guess that is libel. Isn't it? Or at least
>>>>>>>> an attempt at it. Like I said, I am still waiting for you
>>>>>>>> to give details on this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You are a piece of work, aren't you?
>>>>>>>> This is a board to discuss mold litigation and tangential,
>>>>>>>> relevant issues. How is your attempt at libeling me
>>>>>>>> relevant here? More importantly, how is ANYTHING you post
>>>>>>>> here relevant?