Follow us!

    Re: Nat. Ctr for Victims of Crime

    Posted by Deborah on 10/08/10

    Expressing your opinion as fact feeble.

    Please provide links to the "malicious and slanderous lies against Micheal
    Becnel" that I have allegedly made "all over the internet".

    On 10/08/10, Mike B. wrote:
    > You're desparately grasping at straws.
    > Your malicious and slanderous lies against Michael Becnel are all over
    > this board and in the files.
    > See you in court.
    > On 10/08/10, Deborah wrote:
    >> A motion for a new trial for the suit I brought against you may be in
    >> order. As for whether or not law enforcement may or may not be
    >> interested, we will let them be the judge of that.
    >> No proscription in certain matters, especially when a trial was
    >> commenced as mine was against you..and thank you for admitting that
    >> you did commit those crimes as indicated by your last sentence below
    >> about ancient lawsuits and claims that have long ago been decided
    >> ....and otherwise prescribed.
    >> On 10/07/10, Mike B. wrote:
    >>> Deborah:
    >>> Save me some money so I don't have to hire a PI to locate you and
    >>> serve you with the suit I'm bringing against you for all the
    >>> slanderous, libelous and malicious statements you've made about me
    >>> on this board and elsewhere. I'm going to be your "Kelman."
    >>> As far as your intentionally false allegations in this post,
    >>> nobody, especially law enforcement, is going to do anything about
    >>> ancient lawsuits and claims that have long been decided against
    >>> you, and have otherwise prescribed.
    >>> On 10/06/10, Deborah wrote:
    >>>> Mike B has alleged many things about me yet provided no specifics
    >>>> or proof.
    >>>> Since I cannot contact you directly, whomever you are, I have
    >>>> contacted law enforcement and hope that they will review the
    >>>> retaliatory eviction proceedings as well as my civil suit against
    >>>> Michael E Becnel while reviewing the information I have compiled
    >>>> over the last number of years.
    >>>> How is the lawn care service working out for you?
    >>>> On 10/06/10, Mike B. wrote:
    >>>>> Sharon:
    >>>>> I see you've already found another "cause" to take up.
    >>>>> You're wrong on so many levels about me and what I do, it
    >>>>> would take way too long to address here. Suffice it to say I'm
    >>>>> not concerned about what you and Deborah "believe."
    >>>>> Like you, Deborah went to court over all the lies,
    >>>>> fabrications and total BS she says about me. Like you, the
    >>>>> court found her to be a less than credible individual whose
    >>>>> testimony was self-serving and irrellevant.
    >>>>> It's obvious from your posting on here and elsewhere, neither
    >>>>> you nor Deborah know anything about black mold. You simply
    >>>>> regurgitate what others have written or said because you think
    >>>>> it supports your position. I've got news for you - IMHO your
    >>>>> position is nothing more than that of an alarmist and a
    >>>>> hypocrite. You talk some talk, but you definitely can't walk
    >>>>> the walk.
    >>>>> You're a sore loser, but a loser nonetheless.
    >>>>> On 10/06/10, Sharon wrote:
    >>>>>> Deborah,
    >>>>>> Interesting link. I would say that this situation definately
    >>>>>> applies to Mike B's deeply seeded and long term hatred
    >>>>> toward
    >>>>>> you, while stating he knows personal things about your life
    >>>>>> for many years; while he (she?) fails to disclose their
    >>>>>> identity.
    >>>>>> Some of the stuff he (she?) posts on this board about you,
    >>>>>> gives me the willies of knowing this person obviously knows
    >>>>>> where you live, does not like you..yet will not disclose who
    >>>>>> they are that is in such physically close proximaty to you.
    >>>>>> It is real obvious Mike B is not on this board because they
    >>>>>> care of the issue of black mold. They are only here because
    >>>>>> you are here.
    >>>>>> "A U.S. Department of Justice report estimates that there
    >>>>> may
    >>>>>> be tens or even hundreds of thousands of cyberstalking
    >>>>>> victims in the United States (Report on Cyberstalking,
    >>>>> 1999).
    >>>>>> A 1997 nationwide survey conducted by the University of
    >>>>>> Cincinnati found that almost 25&37; of stalking incidents
    >>>>> among
    >>>>>> college age women involved cyberstalking (Report on
    >>>>>> Cyberstalking, 1999).
    >>>>>> Definition
    >>>>>> Cyberstalking can be defined as threatening behavior or
    >>>>>> unwanted advances directed at another using the Internet and
    >>>>>> other forms of online and computer communications.
    >>>>>> Cyberstalkers target their victims through chat rooms,
    >>>>>> message boards, discussion forums, and e-mail. Cyberstalking
    >>>>>> takes many forms such as: threatening or obscene e-mail;
    >>>>>> spamming (in which a stalker sends a victim a multitude of
    >>>>>> junk e-mail); live chat harassment or flaming (online verbal
    >>>>>> abuse); leaving improper messages on message boards...
    >>>>>> Similar to stalking off-line, online stalking can be a
    >>>>>> terrifying experience for victims, placing them at risk of
    >>>>>> psychological trauma, and possible physical harm. Many
    >>>>>> cyberstalking situations do evolve into off-line stalking,
    >>>>>> and a victim may experience abusive and excessive phone
    >>>>>> calls, vandalism, threatening or obscene mail, trespassing,
    >>>>>> and physical assault.
    >>>>>> Cyberstalking and the Law
    >>>>>> ...Stalking laws and other statutes criminalizing harassment
    >>>>>> behavior currently in effect in many states may already
    >>>>>> address this issue by making it a crime to communicate by
    >>>>> any
    >>>>>> means with the intent to harass or alarm the victim.
    >>>>>> States have begun to address the use of computer equipment
    >>>>>> for stalking purposes by including provisions prohibiting
    >>>>>> such activity in both harassment and anti-stalking
    >>>>>> legislation (Riveira, 1,2). A handful of states, such as
    >>>>>> Alabama, Arizona, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, New
    >>>>>> Hampshire and New York have specifically including
    >>>>>> prohibitions against harassing electronic, computer or e-
    >>>>> mail
    >>>>>> communications in their harassment legislation. Alaska,
    >>>>>> Oklahoma, Wyoming, and more recently, California, have
    >>>>>> incorporated electronically communicated statements as
    >>>>>> conduct constituting stalking in their anti-stalking laws. A
    >>>>>> few states have both stalking and harassment statutes that
    >>>>>> criminalize threatening and unwanted electronic
    >>>>>> communications. Other states have laws other than harassment
    >>>>>> or anti-stalking statutes that prohibit misuse of computer
    >>>>>> communications and e-mail, while others have passed laws
    >>>>>> containing broad language that can be interpreted to include
    >>>>>> cyberstalking behaviors (Gregorie).
    >>>>>>> Recent federal law has addressed cyberstalking as well. The
    >>>>>> Violence Against Women Act, passed in 2000, made
    >>>>>> cyberstalking a part of the federal interstate stalking
    >>>>>> statute. Other federal legislation that addresses
    >>>>>> cyberstalking has been introduced recently, but no such
    >>>>>> measures have yet been enacted. Consequently, there remains
    >>>>> a
    >>>>>> lack of legislation at the federal level to specifically
    >>>>>> address cyberstalking, leaving the majority of legislative
    >>>>>> prohibitions against cyberstalking at the state level
    >>>>>> (
    >>>>>> If you are a Victim of Cyberstalking
    >>>>>> Victims who are under the age of 18 should tell their
    >>>>> parents
    >>>>>> or another adult they trust about any harassments and/or
    >>>>>> threats.
    >>>>>> Experts suggest that in cases where the offender is known,
    >>>>>> victims should send the stalker a clear written warning.
    >>>>>> Specifically, victims should communicate that the contact is
    >>>>>> unwanted, and ask the perpetrator to cease sending
    >>>>>> communications of any kind. Victims should do this only
    >>>>> once.
    >>>>>> Then, no matter the response, victims should under no
    >>>>>> circumstances ever communicate with the stalker again.
    >>>>>> Victims should save copies of this communication in both
    >>>>>> electronic and hard copy form.
    >>>>>> If the harassment continues, the victim may wish to file a
    >>>>>> complaint with the stalker's Internet service provider, as
    >>>>>> well as with their own service provider. Many Internet
    >>>>>> service providers offer tools that filter or block
    >>>>>> communications from specific individuals.
    >>>>>> As soon as individuals suspect they are victims of online
    >>>>>> harassment or cyberstalking, they should start collecting
    >>>>> all
    >>>>>> evidence and document all contact made by the stalker. Save
    >>>>>> all e-mail, postings, or other communications in both
    >>>>>> electronic and hard-copy form. If possible, save all of the
    >>>>>> header information from e-mails and newsgroup postings.
    >>>>>> Record the dates and times of any contact with the stalker.
    >>>>>> Victims may also want to start a log of each communication
    >>>>>> explaining the situation in more detail. Victims may want to
    >>>>>> document how the harassment is affecting their lives and
    >>>>> what
    >>>>>> steps they have taken to stop the harassment.
    >>>>>> Victims may want to file a report with local law enforcement
    >>>>>> or contact their local prosecutor's office to see what
    >>>>>> charges, if any, can be pursued. Victims should save copies
    >>>>>> of police reports and record all contact with law
    >>>>> enforcement
    >>>>>> officials and the prosecutor's office...
    >>>>>> Furthermore, victims should contact online directory
    >>>>> listings
    >>>>>> such as,, and
    >>>>>> to request removal from their directory.
    >>>>>> Finally, under no circumstances should victims agree to meet
    >>>>>> with the perpetrator face to face to "work it out,"
    >>>>>> or "talk." No contact should ever be made with the stalker.
    >>>>>> Meeting a stalker in person can be very dangerous.
    >>>>>> Just because cyberstalking does not include physical contact
    >>>>>> with the perpetrator does not mean it is not as threatening
    >>>>>> or frightening as any other type of crime. Victims of
    >>>>>> cyberstalking often experience psychological trauma, as well
    >>>>>> as physical and emotional reactions as a result of their
    >>>>>> victimization. Some of these effects may include:
    >>>>>> changes in sleeping and eating patterns
    >>>>>> nightmares
    >>>>>> hypervigilance
    >>>>>> anxiety
    >>>>>> helplessness
    >>>>>> fear for safety
    >>>>>> shock and disbelief
    >>>>>> Victims experiencing these reactions and many others might
    >>>>>> consider seeking out support from friends, family and victim
    >>>>>> service professionals in order to cope with the trauma
    >>>>>> resulting from cyberstalking. In order to locate local
    >>>>> victim
    >>>>>> service professionals that may be able to offer assistance,
    >>>>>> safety suggestions, and information and referrals, please
    >>>>>> contact the Helpline of the National Center for Victims of
    >>>>>> Crime at 1-800-FYI-CALL
    >> begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              1-800-FYI-
    > CALL      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
    > begin_of_the_skype_highlighting�������������
    > 1-800-FYI-
    >>> CALL������end_of_the_skype_highlighting,
    >>>> 8:30 a.m. to 8:30 p.m., Monday
    >>>>>> through Friday, Eastern Standard Time.
    >>>>>> Read more about cyberstalking via the Stalking Resource
    >>>>>> Center.
    >>>>>> For more information, please contact:
    >>>>>> The Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
    >>>>>> 3100 5th Avenue., Suite B
    >>>>>> San Diego, CA 92103
    >>>>>> (619) 298-3396
    >>>>>> Resources on the World Wide Web:
    >>>>>> National Center for Victims of Crime Stalking Resource
    >>>>> Center
    >>>>>> National Network to End Domestic Violence (NNEDV)
    >>>>>> Working to Halt Online Abuse (WHOA) -
    >>>>>> CyberAngels
    >>>>>> Safety Ed International
    >>>>>> Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC)
    >>>>>> Online Privacy Alliance
    >>>>>> Network Solutions WHOIS - Helps determine contents of domain
    >>>>>> name registration
    >>>>>> Your local prosecutor's office, law enforcement, or state
    >>>>>> Attorney General's office. Check in the Blue Pages of your
    >>>>>> local phone book under the appropriate section heading of
    >>>>>> either "Local Government," "County Government," or "State
    >>>>>> Government."
    >>>>>> References
    >>>>>> U.S. Department of Justice. (August 1999). Cyberstalking: A
    >>>>>> New Challenge for Law Enforcement and Industry -- A Report
    >>>>>> from the Attorney General to the Vice President. Washington,
    >>>>>> DC: U.S. Department of Justice, pp. 2, 6.
    >>>>>> Gregorie, Trudy. Cyberstalking: Dangers on the Information
    >>>>>> Superhighway. The Stalking Resource Center, The National
    >>>>>> Center for Victims of Crime. Online.
    >>>>>> Riveira, Diane. (September/October 2000). "Internet Crimes
    >>>>>> Against Women," Sexual Assault Report, 4 (1).
    >>>>>> Wired Patrol. "US Federal Laws- Cyberstalking." Accessed 15
    >>>>>> April 2003.
    >>>>>> On 10/05/10, Deborah wrote:
    >>>>>> dbName=DocumentViewer&DocumentID=32458#4
    >>>>>>> Steps to take if you are being cyberstalked.

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.