Re: 3/11 Critique of ACOEM Mold Statement by Dr. Shoemaker

More | Report Post

Surely, even you can't defend what ACOEM is doing. They did
not reference any research that has taken place since 2002.
Worse they dropped a few references, which were relevant to the
issue. This is not a revision of anything. Its insurance
fraud..and they know it.

Critique of ACOEM Mold Statement:
http://www.survivingmold.com/news/2011/03/acoem-2011-
critique-dr-ritchie-shoemaker/

On 3/14/11, Rem Dude wrote:
> And Dr. Shoemaker makes money doing what???
>
> On one hand folks claim that ACOEM has a financial interest
> in tainting the facts, yet few admit the biggest ACOEM
> critics are often profiting from mold exposure cases.
>
> Hummm...
>
> RD
>
> On 3/13/11, Sharon Kramer wrote:
>> "Finally, ACOEM 2011 is here! After all the damage done to
>> victims of moldy buildings by ACOEM 2002, I hoped to find
>> something from this report that would benefit society. No,
>> there is nothing here. Just more of the self-serving
>> sleight of hand served up by this trade body for the
>> benefit of their customers.
>>
>> So many of us have seen just how the ACOEM 2002 was a tool
>> designed to sway opinions of those uninformed, especially
>> including judges and juries. ACOEM advertised itself
>> as “The pre-eminent organization of physicians who
> champion
>> the health and safety of workers, workplaces and
>> environments.” Based on the ACOEM 2002 and 2011, one may
> re-
>> state this claim to become the pre-eminent organization of
>> defense consultants seeking to perpetrate scientific fraud
>> upon workers, families and all concerned about water-
>> damaged buildings."
>>
>> Comments welcomed.
>>
>> http://www.survivingmold.com/news/2011/03/acoem-2011-
>> critique-dr-ritchie-shoemaker/
>>
>>
>>