Follow us!

    Re: 3/11 Critique of ACOEM Mold Statement by Dr. Shoemaker

    Posted by Sharon on 3/14/11

    Surely, even you can't defend what ACOEM is doing. They did
    not reference any research that has taken place since 2002.
    Worse they dropped a few references, which were relevant to the
    issue. This is not a revision of anything. Its insurance
    fraud..and they know it.

    Critique of ACOEM Mold Statement:

    On 3/14/11, Rem Dude wrote:
    > And Dr. Shoemaker makes money doing what???
    > On one hand folks claim that ACOEM has a financial interest
    > in tainting the facts, yet few admit the biggest ACOEM
    > critics are often profiting from mold exposure cases.
    > Hummm...
    > RD
    > On 3/13/11, Sharon Kramer wrote:
    >> "Finally, ACOEM 2011 is here! After all the damage done to
    >> victims of moldy buildings by ACOEM 2002, I hoped to find
    >> something from this report that would benefit society. No,
    >> there is nothing here. Just more of the self-serving
    >> sleight of hand served up by this trade body for the
    >> benefit of their customers.
    >> So many of us have seen just how the ACOEM 2002 was a tool
    >> designed to sway opinions of those uninformed, especially
    >> including judges and juries. ACOEM advertised itself
    >> as “The pre-eminent organization of physicians who
    > champion
    >> the health and safety of workers, workplaces and
    >> environments.” Based on the ACOEM 2002 and 2011, one may
    > re-
    >> state this claim to become the pre-eminent organization of
    >> defense consultants seeking to perpetrate scientific fraud
    >> upon workers, families and all concerned about water-
    >> damaged buildings."
    >> Comments welcomed.
    >> critique-dr-ritchie-shoemaker/

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.