Re: Sharon Kramer

More | Report Post

Wnat to see more evidence? Its REAL obvious that the courts knew if
they acknowledge KELMAN's perjury to establish malice, US public health
policy would immediately change to the disadvantage of the insurance
industry. A US Chamber/ACOEM author committing perjury and NIOSH
partner undisclosed while litigating against the first person to expose
the fraud in those papers. Hmmmmmm? Wonder why the courts just could
not grasp perjury is criminal?

A. FRAMED A DEFENDANT FOR LIBEL OVER A MATTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH
In their unpublished anti-SLAPP Opinion of November 2006, the Appellate
Panel of McConnell, Aaron and McDonald, made it appear that I had
accused Kelman of getting caught on the witness stand lying about being
paid by by the Manhattan Institute think tank to author a position
statement for a medical trade association, ACOEM:

To quote from the anti-SLAPP Appellate Opinion:

“This testimony supports a conclusion Kelman did not deny he had been
paid by the Manhattan Institute to write a paper, but only denied being
paid by the Manhattan Institute to make revisions in the paper issued
by ACOEM. He admitted being paid by the Manhattan Institute to write a
lay translation. The fact that Kelman did not clarify that he received
payment from the Manhattan Institute until after being confronted with
the Kilian deposition testimony could be viewed by a reasonable jury as
resulting from the poor phrasing of the question rather from an attempt
to deny payment. In sum, Kelman and GlobalTox presented sufficient
evidence to satisfy a prima facie showing that the statement in the
press release was false."

I made no such accusation. My purportedly libelous writing of March
2005 speaks for itself and is a 100% accurate writing. It accurately
states the exchange of money from the Manhattan Institute think-tank
was for the US Chamber’s mold statement, ACOEM’s was a version of
the “Manhattan Institute commissioned piece”. From my purportedly
libelous writing stating the think-tank money was for the Chamber paper:

“He [Kelman] admitted the Manhattan Institute, a national political
think-tank, paid GlobalTox $40,000 to write a position paper regarding
the potential health risks of toxic mold exposure.....In 2003, with the
involvement of the US Chamber of Commerce and ex-developer, US
Congressman Gary Miller (R-CA), the GlobalTox paper was disseminated to
the real estate, mortgage and building industries' associations. A
version of the Manhattan Institute commissioned piece may also be found
as a position statement on the website of a United States medical
policy-writing body, the American College of Occupational and
Environmental Medicine.”

B. VIOLATED THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATES OF INTERESTED PARTIES.
The Appellate Court was evidenced in 2006, that there was a sixth owner
of GlobalTox and an undisclosed party to the litigation, Bryan Hardin,
whose name was missing from the Certificate of Interested Parties –even
on the supplemental certificate: Certificate of Interested Parties are
to assure that Appellate Justices have no conflicts of interest with
the parties on appeal.

This is evidence itself of conflicted of interest and self perception of
being above the law. As the Appellate Panel of McConnell, Aaron and
McDonald were evidenced by a June 2006 request to take judicial notice:
“Appellate Case No.: D047758 Superior Court Case No.: GIN044539
APPLICATION AND REQUEST FOR AN ORDER THAT THE COURT OF APPEAL TAKE
JUDICIAL NOTICE; DECLARATION OF WILLIAM J. BROWN III; MEMORANDUM OF
POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; PROPOSED ORDER
********************
Trial transcript of Bryan Hardin (additional Veritox principal,
shareholder and party to this litigation undisclosed to this court)
dated August 11, 2005 from the Oregon case entitled O’Hara v David Blain
Construction, Inc., County of Lane Case number 160417923 at pages 136
and 154.
Trial transcript of Bruce J. Kelman dated April 14, 2006 from the
Arizona case entitled ABAD v. Creekside Place Holdings, case number C-
2002 4299, P. 31-32, P. 67-68, describing Kelman and five additional
principals of Veritox. DATED: June 29, 2006 William J. Brown III”
Stating a nonsense reason for refusal to acknowledge Hardin was
improperly not disclosed on the Certificate of Interested Parties, in
2006, the Appellate Panel of Justices McConnell, Aaron and McDonald
refused to take notice of the evidence because it was not presented in
the lower court. Lower courts do not receive Certificates of
Interested Parties. Appellate courts do. As stated in the Appellate
anti-SLAPP Opinion of November 2006, as a footnote:

“3. Kramer asked us to take judicial notice of additional documents,
including the complaint and an excerpt from Kelman’s deposition in her
lawsuit against her insurance company. We decline to do so as it does
not appear these items were presented to the trial court.”

C. REWARDED A PLAINTIFF’S PERJURY TO ESTABLISH MALICE WHILE
LITIGATING OVER A MATTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH
As the Appellate Court was evidenced in 2006 and again in 2010,
undisclosed party, Hardin’s business partner, Kelman, committed perjury
to establish needed reason for malice while strategically litigating
against public participation. Kelman claimed to have given a testimony
when retained as an expert in my own mold litigation of long ago, that
he never gave. Every single California judiciary to oversee this case
along with the Commission on Judicial Performance and the State Bar
have been provided the uncontroverted evidence the following is
criminal perjury to establish libel law needed reason for malice:

PERJURY BY KELMAN TO ESTABLISH MALICE FALSELY STATING IN
DECLARATIONS, TESTIMONY HE NEVER GAVE IN MY MOLD
LITIGATION WITH MY HOMEOWNER INSURER IN WHICH I
RECEIVED A HALF A MILLION DOLLAR SETTLEMENT:
“I testified the types and amounts of mold in the Kramer house could
not have caused the life threatening illnesses she claimed.”

SUBORNING OF PERJURY BY SCHEUER TO ESTABLISH FALSE
REASON FOR MALICE:
“Dr. Kelman testified the types and amounts of mold in the Kramer house
could not have caused the life threatening illnesses she claimed.
Apparently furious that the science conflicted with her dreams of a
remodeled house, Kramer launched into an obsessive campaign to destroy
the reputations of Dr. Kelman and GlobalTox.”

A VIDEO OF THE DEPOSITION OF KELMAN’s PERJURY, TRYINGTO
COERCE ME TO ENDORSE THE FRAUD IN POLICY AND THE DAMAGE TO ME
MAY BE VIEWED AT: http://blip.tv/conflictedsciencemold/3-minute-video-
of-perjuryattempted-coercion-into-silence-by-bruce-kelman-2073775

Justice McConnell and many others have this video including the
California Commission on Judicial Performance and the Chief Trial
Intake Division of the California State Bar. Judge Enright has been
made aware of where to view it on the net in 2010. The Appellate Panel
of Huffman, Irion and Benke have the transcript of thedepositions
specifically called out for them in Briefs and Appellate Appendix.

D. 2010 APPELLATE OPINION CONCEALED FRAUD IN 2006 anti-SLAPP
OPINION In September of 2010, the Appellate Panel of you, Patricia
Benke and Joan Irion rendered an Appellate Opinion. Fully evidenced
that in 2006, their peers framed a defendant for libel over a matter of
public health; rewarded a plaintiff’s use of perjury to establish
needed reason for malice; and ignored the evidenced that a retired
Deputy Director from NIOSH & author of “health policy” for the US
Chamber/ACOEM was an undisclosed party to the litigation; the trio of
justices had the audacity to write the following in their unpublished
Appellate Opinion:

“In a prior opinion, a previous panel of this court affirmed an order
denying Kramer's motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP statute. In
doing so, we largely resolved the issues Kramer now raises on appeal.
In our prior opinion, we found sufficient evidence Kramer's Internet
post was false and defamatory as well as sufficient evidence the post
was published with constitutional malice.”

And THAT is not even the worst of it. I can evidence the good justices
KNOW that what they have done as aided with interstate insurer fraud on
behalf of the affiliates of the US Chamber. No less than $25M in one
case..involving deceased infants. And THAT's not even the worst of it.

On 9/30/11, Sharon Kramer wrote:
> That would be incorrect. While YOU make statements. I always
> provide evidence. Seems we have a little problem with Government Code
> 6200 violations and judgments entered that were not possible to have
> occurred. And then there is that minor detail of the retired NIOSH
> guy who authored a paper for the US Chamber that cited false
> physician authorship. The courts were informed he was an undisclosed
> party. They ignored it - and then ignored his business partner
> committed perjury to establish malice. BTW, the case is still not
> over.
>
> http://katysexposure.wordpress.com/2011/09/13/is-the-california-court-
> case-management-system-ccms-being-misused-for-politics-in-policy-
> litigation-and-the-fleecing-of-the-california-taxpayer/
>
> On 9/30/11, Courthouse Gang wrote:
>> No, Mrs. Kramer, it is YOU who provided no supporting evidence.
>>
>> The suit record, the judgment of the trial court, and the
>> decisions of the courts of appeal are our supporting evidence that
>> you lost fair and square.
>>
>> Therefore, your current remarks and statements about the judicial
>> system are just your bitter, one-sided version of your cause du
>> jour.
>>
>>
>> On 9/29/11, Sharon Kramer wrote:
>>> Always amazing how commenters make statements, while providing
>> no
>>> supporting evidence...and while hiding behind pseudonyms.
>>>
>>> Want to see a video of Bruce Kelman committing perjury to
>>> establish needed reason for malice? The good justices of the
>>> Fourth, Division One have this....and they KNOW I am not
>> shutting
>>> up about what they have done.
>>>
>>> http://blip.tv/conflictedsciencemold/3-minute-video-of-
>>> perjuryattempted-coercion-into-silence-by-bruce-kelman-2073775
>>>
>>> http://freepdfhosting.com/0267bd88be.pdf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/29/11, The Courthouse Gang wrote:
>>>> Sharon Kramer lost fair and square. Her opinions about the
>>>> judges and the court system are unsupported in fact and law.
>>>> Move on.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 9/28/11, Sharon Kramer wrote:
>>>>> Someone who goes by "JZ" does not have the grace to use
>>>> their
>>>>> real name or provide corroboration for the Nettrollish (is
>>>>> that a word?) behavior.
>>>>>
>>>>> NEW on KATY's EXPOSURE
>>>>>
>>>>> "Pardon Our French, But S’entendant pour frauder le public
>>>>> est criminelle. Justices Judy McConnell, Dick Huffman, Ron
>>>>> George & Co. You’ve Been Caught RED HANDED Colluding With
>>>> The
>>>>> US Chamber of Commerce To Defraud The Public By Criminal
>>>>> Means…"
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/27/11, JZ wrote:
>>>>>> is a Plaintiffs puppet