Re: Sharon Kramer
Posted by Deborah on 11/12/11
I've seen Mrs. Kramer's evidence and it is far more than compelling.
Apparently it was rejected because anyone with half a brain who read
the transcripts and viewed the video could understand that the person
Mrs. Kramer indicated had "altered his under oath testimony" did, in
fact, do just that.
On 9/30/11, Courthouse Gang wrote:
> No, Mrs. Kramer, it is YOU who provided no supporting evidence.
> The suit record, the judgment of the trial court, and the
> decisions of the courts of appeal are our supporting evidence that
> you lost fair and square.
> Therefore, your current remarks and statements about the judicial
> system are just your bitter, one-sided version of your cause du
> On 9/29/11, Sharon Kramer wrote:
>> Always amazing how commenters make statements, while providing
>> supporting evidence...and while hiding behind pseudonyms.
>> Want to see a video of Bruce Kelman committing perjury to
>> establish needed reason for malice? The good justices of the
>> Fourth, Division One have this....and they KNOW I am not
>> up about what they have done.
>> On 9/29/11, The Courthouse Gang wrote:
>>> Sharon Kramer lost fair and square. Her opinions about the
>>> judges and the court system are unsupported in fact and law.
>>> Move on.
>>> On 9/28/11, Sharon Kramer wrote:
>>>> Someone who goes by "JZ" does not have the grace to use
>>>> real name or provide corroboration for the Nettrollish (is
>>>> that a word?) behavior.
>>>> NEW on KATY's EXPOSURE
>>>> "Pardon Our French, But S’entendant pour frauder le public
>>>> est criminelle. Justices Judy McConnell, Dick Huffman, Ron
>>>> George & Co. You’ve Been Caught RED HANDED Colluding With
>>>> US Chamber of Commerce To Defraud The Public By Criminal
>>>> On 9/27/11, JZ wrote:
>>>>> is a Plaintiffs puppet
Posts on this thread, including this one