Posted by Sharon Kramer on 11/13/11

More | Report Post

On September 11, 2011, I sent letters to the leaders of
Ca's judicial system, the Judicial Council, which is headed
by the CA Supreme Court Chief Justice. Within the letters
I provided a link to a website, Katy's Exposure, where they
could read the legal documents from the public record cases
of Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer & Kelman v. Kramer; in
which the first case the courts framed me for libel while
suppressing the evidence that US Chamber/ACOEM mold policy
author, Kelman, committed criminal perjury to establish
needed reason for malice while strategically litigatin in
CA's courts for now over six years, over a matter of public
health.

And in the second case, issued a gag order that I could not
write of what occurred in the first case. The gag order is
that I not republish the five words that were the sole
cause of action of the case, "altered his under oath
statements"

If unable to republish the words that were the sole cause
of action, I am also precluded from stating and evidencing
what occurred in the case. How the courts framed me for
libel, and what evidence was suppressed when making their
finding of libel with actual malice.

On September 13, 2011, we placed the letters to the
Judicial Council regarding the cases that is a matter of
public record, on the net at Katy's Exposure:
http://wp.me/plYPz-3aV

What I received in reply when seeking help to stop
corruption in the courts was on October 12, 2011, Kelman
and his attorney filed a Contempt of Court COMPLAINT.
Attached as the Exhibit of why I need to be sent to jail is
the Septmber 13th posting on Katy's of the letters sent to
the leaders of CA's judicial system, evidencing the courts
framed me for libel & suppressed the evidence of Kelman's
perjury to establish malice (among many other
court "irregularities").

Kelman's October 12th COMPLAINT: (link takes a few seconds
to open) http://freepdfhosting.com/6dcd05474d.pdf

On October 21st, being fully evidenced of what occurred in
the prior case and the Exhibit attached to the COMPLAINT is
evidence of the courts colluding to defraud in the prior
case; the judge set a date for a Contempt of Court hearing,
Nov. 14, 2011. They were just going to wham bam thank you
mam, send me to jail for writing of a case that is a matter
of public record while stating the sole cause of action of
the case and seeking help from the leaders of Ca's courts.

It doesn't work that way. On November 10th, I had an
ExParte hearing. Seems the courts forgot that you have to
serve someone with an Order to Show Cause in person, the
accused has the right to face their accusor, and no
delivered OSC, no court juirisdiction for Contempt. (took
me 15 minutes in the law library to find that, the code and
case law. Wonder why a licensed attorney and a judge did
not know that?)

ExParte App of Nov 10th. (lol, we all know I can't tpye
wlel)
http://freepdfhosting.com/66dcc40dc8.pdf

Now we have a Contempt of Court hearing scheduled for Jan
6th. Pay no attention to the fact that the case is a matter
of public record of which anyone can write.

I may not be a lawyer, but I am pretty darn sure that it is
criminal for courts to frame someone for libel while
suppressing evidence of a plaintiff's criminal perjury to
establish needed reason for malice...and then threaten to
incarcerate someone when they refuse to be silenced of what
occurred in a case that is a matter of public record. AND
what the courts KNOWINGLY did to aid insurer fraud in the
courtroom and in claims handling practices on behalf of the
affiliates of the US Chamber - not just in CA, nationwide.

It should be noted that the owner of Katy's Exposure blog
was mailed via the US Postal Service, interstate, a threat
of litigation by Kelman's attorney in May 2011, if she
continued to publish of a case that is a matter of public
record including the words that were the sole cause of
action. Neither she nor I have ever repeated the sole
cause phrase without discussing it in the context of the
public record case.
May 2011 Threat to Katy's.
http://freepdfhosting.com/21ca99ee8e.pdf

So apparently, anyone else in the world except she and I
could write, "In the case of Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer,
which is a matter of public record, Kelman and Globaltox
sued Kramer for the words, 'altered his under oath
statements".

If I write it, even when evidencing criminal behavior in
the courts to the Judicial Council of CA via legal
documents from the public record case, I am going to jail.
If she publishes the evidence of what occurred in the
public record case, she will be sued for....something.

Needless to say, I am not going to be silenced of the
courts colluding with VeriTox to defraud the public on
behalf of the affiliates of the US Chamber. If I am going
to jail for the word, "altered" when in reality it is for
speaking and evidencing corruption in CA's judicial branch
at its highest levels, people are going to know why I am
there. Seems like the courts are trying to make me a Poster
Child of the reason for the Occupy Wall Street movement.

Let's not forget, my "libelous" writing of March 2005 was
the first to publicly expose how ACOEM, VeriTox and the US
Chamber were connected in mass marketing the false concept
into public health, workers comp and to the courts that it
had been scientifically proven, "Thus the notion that toxic
mold is an insidious secret killer, as so many media and
trial lawyers would claim is Junk Science unsupported by
(cough, cough) actual scientific study." The next time it
was written of, was on the front page of the Wall Street
Journal.

Personally, I think they must have lost their minds at 455
Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA. Aka home of the CA
Judicial Council and the CA Commission on Judicial
Performance.

Black Mold Claims Chatboard

LATEST POSTS | BY TOPICS | SUBMIT A POST