Re: Ca Judicial Council, Veritox, US Chamber Collude To Defr
Posted by Deborah on 11/14/11
That is an excellent idea.
BTW, most prisons have internet access albeit limited. Her work
will continue and no one is foolish enough now not to see the
rhizoid-like progression of conflicts of interest across several
professions concerning the indoor mold issue and the suppression
of the hard science and facts.
On 11/14/11, The Courthouse Gang wrote:
> Demand a pre-incarceration physical and mental examination
> and evaluation. Those cells (including the padded ones)
> might have some of that mold in there, and you want to be
> able to prove you were healthy when you went in.
> Since you can't blog from the inside, it's expected you'll
> be sending your accusations and complaints via the regular
> postal service. Please include an updated, detailed listing
> of all free people and inmates you believe are also part of
> the conspiracy. Collect calls will not be accepted.
> Remember, all calls are monitored.
> On 11/13/11, Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer wrote:
>> On September 11, 2011, I sent letters to the leaders of
>> Ca's judicial system, the Judicial Council, which is
>> by the CA Supreme Court Chief Justice.
>> Within the letters I provided a link to a website, Katy's
>> Exposure, where they could read the legal documents from
>> the public record of two cases: Kelman & GlobalTox v.
>> Kramer Case No. GIN044539 North San Diego County Superior
>> Court (filed 2005) & Kelman v. Kramer Case No 37-2010-
>> 00061530 CU-DF-NC, North San Diego County Superior Court
>> I evidenced that in the first case the courts framed me
>> libel while suppressing the evidence that US Chamber/ACOEM
>> mold policy author, Kelman, committed criminal perjury to
>> establish needed reason for malice while strategically
>> litigating in CA's courts for now over six years, over a
>> matter of public health.
>> And in the second case, the court issued a gag order that
>> could not write of what occurred in the first case. The
>> order of May 2, 2011, is that I not republish the five
>> words that were the sole cause of action of the
>> case, "altered his under oath statements."
>> If unable to republish the words that were the sole cause
>> of action, I am also precluded from stating and evidencing
>> what occurred in the case, how the courts framed me for
>> libel to make my writing appear to state a false
>> that it did not state, and what evidence was suppressed by
>> every judge of criminal perjury to establish malice, when
>> making their finding of libel with actual malice.
>> On September 13, 2011, we placed the letters to the
>> Judicial Council regarding the cases that are a matter of
>> public record, on the net at Katy's Exposure:
>> What I received in reply when seeking help to stop
>> corruption in the courts was on October 12, 2011, Kelman
>> and his attorney filed a Contempt of Court COMPLAINT.
>> Attached as the Exhibit of why I need to be sent to jail
>> the September 13th posting on Katy's of the letters sent
>> the leaders of CA's judicial system, evidencing the courts
>> framed me for libel & suppressed the evidence of Kelman's
>> perjury to establish malice (among many other
>> court "irregularities").
>> Kelman's October 12th COMPLAINT: (link takes a few seconds
>> to open) http://freepdfhosting.com/6dcd05474d.pdf
>> On October 21st, being fully evidenced of what occurred in
>> the prior case and that the Exhibit attached to the
>> COMPLAINT is evidence of the courts colluding to defraud
>> the prior case; the judge set a date for a Contempt of
>> Court hearing, Nov. 14, 2011. They were just going to wham
>> bam thank you mam, send me to jail for writing of a case
>> that is a matter of public record while stating the sole
>> cause of action of the case and seeking help from the
>> leaders of Ca's courts.
>> It doesn't work that way. On November 10th, I had an
>> ExParte hearing. Seems the courts forgot that you have to
>> serve someone with an Order to Show Cause (OSC) in person,
>> the accused has the right to face their accuser, and no
>> delivered OSC, no court jurisdiction for Contempt. (took
>> me 15 minutes in the law library to find that, the code
>> case law. Wonder why a CA licensed attorney and a judge
>> not know that?)
>> ExParte App of Nov 10th. (lol, we all know I can't tpye
>> wlel) http://freepdfhosting.com/66dcc40dc8.pdf
>> Now we have a Contempt of Court hearing scheduled for Jan
>> 6th. Pay no attention to the fact that the case is a
>> of public record of which anyone can write; and the
>> evidence of why I need to be sent to jail are letters to
>> the leaders of CA's judicial branch seeking help for
>> corruption in the courts as evidenced by legal documents
>> sent to them and via the Net.
>> I may not be a lawyer, but I am pretty darn sure that it
>> criminal for courts to frame someone for libel while
>> suppressing evidence of a plaintiff's criminal perjury to
>> establish needed reason for malice...and then threaten to
>> incarcerate someone when they refuse to be silenced of
>> occurred in a case that is a matter of public record. AND
>> what the courts KNOWINGLY did to aid insurer fraud in the
>> courtroom and in claims handling practices on behalf of
>> affiliates of the US Chamber - not just in CA, nationwide.
>> It should be noted that the owner of Katy's Exposure blog
>> was mailed via the US Postal Service, interstate, a threat
>> of litigation by Kelman's attorney in May 2011, if she
>> continued to publish of a case that is a matter of public
>> record including the words that were the sole cause of
>> action. Neither she nor I have ever repeated the sole
>> cause phrase without discussing it in the context of the
>> public record case.
>> May 2011 Threat to Katy's.
>> So apparently, anyone else in the world except she and I
>> could write, "In the case of Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer,
>> which is a matter of public record, Kelman and Globaltox
>> sued Kramer for the words, 'altered his under oath
>> If I write it, even when evidencing criminal behavior in
>> the courts to the Judicial Council of CA via legal
>> documents from the public record case, I am going to jail.
>> If she publishes the evidence of what occurred in the
>> public record case, she will be sued for....something.
>> Needless to say, I am not going to be silenced of the
>> courts colluding with VeriTox to defraud the public on
>> behalf of the affiliates of the US Chamber. If I am going
>> to jail for the word, "altered" when in reality it is for
>> speaking and evidencing corruption in CA's judicial branch
>> at its highest levels, people are going to know why I am
>> Seems like the courts are trying to make me a Poster
>> Child of the reason for the Occupy Wall Street movement.
>> Let's not forget, my "libelous" writing of March 2005 was
>> the first to publicly expose how ACOEM, VeriTox and the US
>> Chamber were connected in mass marketing the false concept
>> into public health, workers comp and to the courts that it
>> had been scientifically proven, "Thus the notion that
>> mold is an insidious secret killer, as so many media and
>> trial lawyers would claim is Junk Science unsupported by
>> (cough, cough) actual scientific study." The next time it
>> was written of, was on the front page of the Wall Street
>> Personally, I think they must have lost their minds at 455
>> Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA. Aka home of the CA
>> Judicial Council and the CA Commission on Judicial
>> Performance, if they think they can sweep this one under
>> the jailhouse rug.
>> Its billions in the defrauding of the public, aided by
>> leaders of the CA courts, by criminal means for now over
>> six years. http://wp.me/plYPz-3c5
Posts on this thread, including this one