Follow us!

    Re: Ca Judicial Council, Veritox, US Chamber Collude To Defr

    Posted by Deborah on 11/14/11

    That is an excellent idea.

    BTW, most prisons have internet access albeit limited. Her work
    will continue and no one is foolish enough now not to see the
    rhizoid-like progression of conflicts of interest across several
    professions concerning the indoor mold issue and the suppression
    of the hard science and facts.

    On 11/14/11, The Courthouse Gang wrote:
    > Demand a pre-incarceration physical and mental examination
    > and evaluation. Those cells (including the padded ones)
    > might have some of that mold in there, and you want to be
    > able to prove you were healthy when you went in.
    > Since you can't blog from the inside, it's expected you'll
    > be sending your accusations and complaints via the regular
    > postal service. Please include an updated, detailed listing
    > of all free people and inmates you believe are also part of
    > the conspiracy. Collect calls will not be accepted.
    > Remember, all calls are monitored.
    > On 11/13/11, Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer wrote:
    >> On September 11, 2011, I sent letters to the leaders of
    >> Ca's judicial system, the Judicial Council, which is
    > headed
    >> by the CA Supreme Court Chief Justice.
    >> Within the letters I provided a link to a website, Katy's
    >> Exposure, where they could read the legal documents from
    >> the public record of two cases: Kelman & GlobalTox v.
    >> Kramer Case No. GIN044539 North San Diego County Superior
    >> Court (filed 2005) & Kelman v. Kramer Case No 37-2010-
    >> 00061530 CU-DF-NC, North San Diego County Superior Court
    >> (2010)
    >> I evidenced that in the first case the courts framed me
    > for
    >> libel while suppressing the evidence that US Chamber/ACOEM
    >> mold policy author, Kelman, committed criminal perjury to
    >> establish needed reason for malice while strategically
    >> litigating in CA's courts for now over six years, over a
    >> matter of public health.
    >> And in the second case, the court issued a gag order that
    > I
    >> could not write of what occurred in the first case. The
    > gag
    >> order of May 2, 2011, is that I not republish the five
    >> words that were the sole cause of action of the
    >> case, "altered his under oath statements."
    >> If unable to republish the words that were the sole cause
    >> of action, I am also precluded from stating and evidencing
    >> what occurred in the case, how the courts framed me for
    >> libel to make my writing appear to state a false
    > accusation
    >> that it did not state, and what evidence was suppressed by
    >> every judge of criminal perjury to establish malice, when
    >> making their finding of libel with actual malice.
    >> On September 13, 2011, we placed the letters to the
    >> Judicial Council regarding the cases that are a matter of
    >> public record, on the net at Katy's Exposure:
    >> What I received in reply when seeking help to stop
    >> corruption in the courts was on October 12, 2011, Kelman
    >> and his attorney filed a Contempt of Court COMPLAINT.
    >> Attached as the Exhibit of why I need to be sent to jail
    > is
    >> the September 13th posting on Katy's of the letters sent
    > to
    >> the leaders of CA's judicial system, evidencing the courts
    >> framed me for libel & suppressed the evidence of Kelman's
    >> perjury to establish malice (among many other
    >> court "irregularities").
    >> Kelman's October 12th COMPLAINT: (link takes a few seconds
    >> to open)
    >> On October 21st, being fully evidenced of what occurred in
    >> the prior case and that the Exhibit attached to the
    >> COMPLAINT is evidence of the courts colluding to defraud
    > in
    >> the prior case; the judge set a date for a Contempt of
    >> Court hearing, Nov. 14, 2011. They were just going to wham
    >> bam thank you mam, send me to jail for writing of a case
    >> that is a matter of public record while stating the sole
    >> cause of action of the case and seeking help from the
    >> leaders of Ca's courts.
    >> It doesn't work that way. On November 10th, I had an
    >> ExParte hearing. Seems the courts forgot that you have to
    >> serve someone with an Order to Show Cause (OSC) in person,
    >> the accused has the right to face their accuser, and no
    >> delivered OSC, no court jurisdiction for Contempt. (took
    >> me 15 minutes in the law library to find that, the code
    > and
    >> case law. Wonder why a CA licensed attorney and a judge
    > did
    >> not know that?)
    >> ExParte App of Nov 10th. (lol, we all know I can't tpye
    >> wlel)
    >> Now we have a Contempt of Court hearing scheduled for Jan
    >> 6th. Pay no attention to the fact that the case is a
    > matter
    >> of public record of which anyone can write; and the
    >> evidence of why I need to be sent to jail are letters to
    >> the leaders of CA's judicial branch seeking help for
    >> corruption in the courts as evidenced by legal documents
    >> sent to them and via the Net.
    >> I may not be a lawyer, but I am pretty darn sure that it
    > is
    >> criminal for courts to frame someone for libel while
    >> suppressing evidence of a plaintiff's criminal perjury to
    >> establish needed reason for malice...and then threaten to
    >> incarcerate someone when they refuse to be silenced of
    > what
    >> occurred in a case that is a matter of public record. AND
    >> what the courts KNOWINGLY did to aid insurer fraud in the
    >> courtroom and in claims handling practices on behalf of
    > the
    >> affiliates of the US Chamber - not just in CA, nationwide.
    >> It should be noted that the owner of Katy's Exposure blog
    >> was mailed via the US Postal Service, interstate, a threat
    >> of litigation by Kelman's attorney in May 2011, if she
    >> continued to publish of a case that is a matter of public
    >> record including the words that were the sole cause of
    >> action. Neither she nor I have ever repeated the sole
    >> cause phrase without discussing it in the context of the
    >> public record case.
    >> May 2011 Threat to Katy's.
    >> So apparently, anyone else in the world except she and I
    >> could write, "In the case of Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer,
    >> which is a matter of public record, Kelman and Globaltox
    >> sued Kramer for the words, 'altered his under oath
    >> statements".
    >> If I write it, even when evidencing criminal behavior in
    >> the courts to the Judicial Council of CA via legal
    >> documents from the public record case, I am going to jail.
    >> If she publishes the evidence of what occurred in the
    >> public record case, she will be sued for....something.
    >> Needless to say, I am not going to be silenced of the
    >> courts colluding with VeriTox to defraud the public on
    >> behalf of the affiliates of the US Chamber. If I am going
    >> to jail for the word, "altered" when in reality it is for
    >> speaking and evidencing corruption in CA's judicial branch
    >> at its highest levels, people are going to know why I am
    >> there.
    >> Seems like the courts are trying to make me a Poster
    >> Child of the reason for the Occupy Wall Street movement.
    >> Let's not forget, my "libelous" writing of March 2005 was
    >> the first to publicly expose how ACOEM, VeriTox and the US
    >> Chamber were connected in mass marketing the false concept
    >> into public health, workers comp and to the courts that it
    >> had been scientifically proven, "Thus the notion that
    > toxic
    >> mold is an insidious secret killer, as so many media and
    >> trial lawyers would claim is Junk Science unsupported by
    >> (cough, cough) actual scientific study." The next time it
    >> was written of, was on the front page of the Wall Street
    >> Journal.
    >> Personally, I think they must have lost their minds at 455
    >> Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA. Aka home of the CA
    >> Judicial Council and the CA Commission on Judicial
    >> Performance, if they think they can sweep this one under
    >> the jailhouse rug.
    >> Its billions in the defrauding of the public, aided by
    >> leaders of the CA courts, by criminal means for now over
    >> six years.

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.