Re: Ca Judicial Council, Veritox, US Chamber Collude To Defr

More | Report Post

Maybe the court thinks you're "altered".

On 11/15/11, Sharon Kramer wrote:
> So now tell me again, WHY would the courts want me to stop
> writing of the case Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer Case No.
> GIN044539 North San Diego County Superior Court, which is a
> matter of public record and with the sole cause of action being
> the accusation that my five words, "altered his under oath
> statements" were libelous, and deemed to be so by the courts?
>
> Anyone else in the world could write the above sentence about a
> case that is a matter of public record. But the courts would
like
> to lock me up and throw away the key for it. Oh, and blog owners
> can't write or put evidence/court docs on the net of what
> actually occurred in the case either, or Kelman's and Hardin's
> attorney will use the US Postal Service to mail them a threat,
> interstate, of litigation.
>
> Could it be because the courts suppressed the evidence that
> Kelman committed perjury to establish needed reason for malice;
> made it appear my writing in question made an accusation it did
> not; concealed that ex-NIOSH product defender, Hardin, was an
> undisclosed party to the litigation for six years; while aiding
> the ACOEM BS over the mold issue on behalf of Chamber affiliates
> to be able to be used to sell doubt of causation in the
> courtrooms; while shifting workers comp insurers' responsibility
> onto the tax payers, to this VERY DAY! http://wp.me/plYPz-
> 3c5 ????
>
> Could that be why the courts want to lock me up for the
> word, "altered"?
>
>
>
>
>
> On 11/14/11, Deborah wrote:
>> That is an excellent idea.
>>
>> BTW, most prisons have internet access albeit limited. Her work
>> will continue and no one is foolish enough now not to see the
>> rhizoid-like progression of conflicts of interest across several
>> professions concerning the indoor mold issue and the suppression
>> of the hard science and facts.
>>
>> On 11/14/11, The Courthouse Gang wrote:
>>> Demand a pre-incarceration physical and mental examination
>>> and evaluation. Those cells (including the padded ones)
>>> might have some of that mold in there, and you want to be
>>> able to prove you were healthy when you went in.
>>>
>>> Since you can't blog from the inside, it's expected you'll
>>> be sending your accusations and complaints via the regular
>>> postal service. Please include an updated, detailed listing
>>> of all free people and inmates you believe are also part of
>>> the conspiracy. Collect calls will not be accepted.
>>> Remember, all calls are monitored.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/13/11, Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer wrote:
>>>> On September 11, 2011, I sent letters to the leaders of
>>>> Ca's judicial system, the Judicial Council, which is
>>> headed
>>>> by the CA Supreme Court Chief Justice.
>>>>
>>>> Within the letters I provided a link to a website, Katy's
>>>> Exposure, where they could read the legal documents from
>>>> the public record of two cases: Kelman & GlobalTox v.
>>>> Kramer Case No. GIN044539 North San Diego County Superior
>>>> Court (filed 2005) & Kelman v. Kramer Case No 37-2010-
>>>> 00061530 CU-DF-NC, North San Diego County Superior Court
>>>> (2010)
>>>>
>>>> I evidenced that in the first case the courts framed me
>>> for
>>>> libel while suppressing the evidence that US Chamber/ACOEM
>>>> mold policy author, Kelman, committed criminal perjury to
>>>> establish needed reason for malice while strategically
>>>> litigating in CA's courts for now over six years, over a
>>>> matter of public health.
>>>>
>>>> And in the second case, the court issued a gag order that
>>> I
>>>> could not write of what occurred in the first case. The
>>> gag
>>>> order of May 2, 2011, is that I not republish the five
>>>> words that were the sole cause of action of the
>>>> case, "altered his under oath statements."
>>>>
>>>> If unable to republish the words that were the sole cause
>>>> of action, I am also precluded from stating and evidencing
>>>> what occurred in the case, how the courts framed me for
>>>> libel to make my writing appear to state a false
>>> accusation
>>>> that it did not state, and what evidence was suppressed by
>>>> every judge of criminal perjury to establish malice, when
>>>> making their finding of libel with actual malice.
>>>>
>>>> On September 13, 2011, we placed the letters to the
>>>> Judicial Council regarding the cases that are a matter of
>>>> public record, on the net at Katy's Exposure:
>>>> http://wp.me/plYPz-3aV
>>>>
>>>> What I received in reply when seeking help to stop
>>>> corruption in the courts was on October 12, 2011, Kelman
>>>> and his attorney filed a Contempt of Court COMPLAINT.
>>>> Attached as the Exhibit of why I need to be sent to jail
>>> is
>>>> the September 13th posting on Katy's of the letters sent
>>> to
>>>> the leaders of CA's judicial system, evidencing the courts
>>>> framed me for libel & suppressed the evidence of Kelman's
>>>> perjury to establish malice (among many other
>>>> court "irregularities").
>>>>
>>>> Kelman's October 12th COMPLAINT: (link takes a few seconds
>>>> to open) http://freepdfhosting.com/6dcd05474d.pdf
>>>>
>>>> On October 21st, being fully evidenced of what occurred in
>>>> the prior case and that the Exhibit attached to the
>>>> COMPLAINT is evidence of the courts colluding to defraud
>>> in
>>>> the prior case; the judge set a date for a Contempt of
>>>> Court hearing, Nov. 14, 2011. They were just going to wham
>>>> bam thank you mam, send me to jail for writing of a case
>>>> that is a matter of public record while stating the sole
>>>> cause of action of the case and seeking help from the
>>>> leaders of Ca's courts.
>>>>
>>>> It doesn't work that way. On November 10th, I had an
>>>> ExParte hearing. Seems the courts forgot that you have to
>>>> serve someone with an Order to Show Cause (OSC) in person,
>>>> the accused has the right to face their accuser, and no
>>>> delivered OSC, no court jurisdiction for Contempt. (took
>>>> me 15 minutes in the law library to find that, the code
>>> and
>>>> case law. Wonder why a CA licensed attorney and a judge
>>> did
>>>> not know that?)
>>>>
>>>> ExParte App of Nov 10th. (lol, we all know I can't tpye
>>>> wlel) http://freepdfhosting.com/66dcc40dc8.pdf
>>>>
>>>> Now we have a Contempt of Court hearing scheduled for Jan
>>>> 6th. Pay no attention to the fact that the case is a
>>> matter
>>>> of public record of which anyone can write; and the
>>>> evidence of why I need to be sent to jail are letters to
>>>> the leaders of CA's judicial branch seeking help for
>>>> corruption in the courts as evidenced by legal documents
>>>> sent to them and via the Net.
>>>>
>>>> I may not be a lawyer, but I am pretty darn sure that it
>>> is
>>>> criminal for courts to frame someone for libel while
>>>> suppressing evidence of a plaintiff's criminal perjury to
>>>> establish needed reason for malice...and then threaten to
>>>> incarcerate someone when they refuse to be silenced of
>>> what
>>>> occurred in a case that is a matter of public record. AND
>>>> what the courts KNOWINGLY did to aid insurer fraud in the
>>>> courtroom and in claims handling practices on behalf of
>>> the
>>>> affiliates of the US Chamber - not just in CA, nationwide.
>>>>
>>>> It should be noted that the owner of Katy's Exposure blog
>>>> was mailed via the US Postal Service, interstate, a threat
>>>> of litigation by Kelman's attorney in May 2011, if she
>>>> continued to publish of a case that is a matter of public
>>>> record including the words that were the sole cause of
>>>> action. Neither she nor I have ever repeated the sole
>>>> cause phrase without discussing it in the context of the
>>>> public record case.
>>>> May 2011 Threat to Katy's.
>>>> http://freepdfhosting.com/21ca99ee8e.pdf
>>>>
>>>> So apparently, anyone else in the world except she and I
>>>> could write, "In the case of Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer,
>>>> which is a matter of public record, Kelman and Globaltox
>>>> sued Kramer for the words, 'altered his under oath
>>>> statements".
>>>>
>>>> If I write it, even when evidencing criminal behavior in
>>>> the courts to the Judicial Council of CA via legal
>>>> documents from the public record case, I am going to jail.
>>>> If she publishes the evidence of what occurred in the
>>>> public record case, she will be sued for....something.
>>>>
>>>> Needless to say, I am not going to be silenced of the
>>>> courts colluding with VeriTox to defraud the public on
>>>> behalf of the affiliates of the US Chamber. If I am going
>>>> to jail for the word, "altered" when in reality it is for
>>>> speaking and evidencing corruption in CA's judicial branch
>>>> at its highest levels, people are going to know why I am
>>>> there.
>>>>
>>>> Seems like the courts are trying to make me a Poster
>>>> Child of the reason for the Occupy Wall Street movement.
>>>>
>>>> Let's not forget, my "libelous" writing of March 2005 was
>>>> the first to publicly expose how ACOEM, VeriTox and the US
>>>> Chamber were connected in mass marketing the false concept
>>>> into public health, workers comp and to the courts that it
>>>> had been scientifically proven, "Thus the notion that
>>> toxic
>>>> mold is an insidious secret killer, as so many media and
>>>> trial lawyers would claim is Junk Science unsupported by
>>>> (cough, cough) actual scientific study." The next time it
>>>> was written of, was on the front page of the Wall Street
>>>> Journal.
>>>>
>>>> Personally, I think they must have lost their minds at 455
>>>> Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA. Aka home of the CA
>>>> Judicial Council and the CA Commission on Judicial
>>>> Performance, if they think they can sweep this one under
>>>> the jailhouse rug.
>>>>
>>>> Its billions in the defrauding of the public, aided by
>>>> leaders of the CA courts, by criminal means for now over
>>>> six years. http://wp.me/plYPz-3c5