Follow us!

    Re: Ca Judicial Council, Veritox, US Chamber Collude To Defr

    Posted by Sharon Kramer on 11/17/11

    Could be. They seem to like that word, "altered". Here is an
    example of it used in a legal document from the court:

    1. In the September 2010 Appellate Opinion, they state on page 1 that
    a judgment was entered in my favor and I was awarded costs as the
    prevailing party over VeriTox. Sept 2010 Appellate Opinion:

    “The jury found that Kramer did not libel GlobalTox and judgment
    against GlobalTox was entered. The trial court awarded Kramer
    $2,545.28 in costs against GlobalTox.”

    2. However, on October 28, 2011, (one year later) the lower court
    found that no such judgment had ever been entered and the judgment
    document needs to "alter" to reflect what the Appellate Court
    misstated had already occurred as far as judgment entered. October
    28, 2011 Minute Order:

    “The clerk is directed to alter the 9/24/11[sic 9/24/08] judgment to
    include the statement that: ‘Defendant Kramer is the prevailing party
    as to Plaintiff Globaltox, Inc. The judgment is hereby amended to
    include costs of $2,545.28 in favor of Defendant Kramer and as
    against Plaintiff Globaltox, Inc.”.

    3. Evidenced by the legal document of the lower court authorship (Oct
    28, 2011, Minute Order) of amending the judgment the Appellate Court
    falsely stated was already entered & evidenced by other legal
    documents that the Appellate Court knew before and after they
    rendered their Opinion that no such judgment was ever entered:

    Page 29 of my Sept 30, 2010 Petition for Rehearing, evidencing the
    APPELLATE COURT KNEW no such jdugment was ever entered.

    4. I think someone among the Courthouse Gang Members must have a
    sense of humor to use that word "alter" in a Minute Order, Oct 28,
    2011, when making a ruling that an amended judgment must be
    entered..because the Appellate Court flat out lied and said it was
    already entered.

    5. Did I tell you the part about the Certificat of Interested
    Persons being falsified in the computer records while concealing
    Bryan Hardin was a party to this litigation all along?

    6. Who is Bryan Hardin and whatt is Veritox? Well, according to Dr.
    Michaels, Head of OSHA, THIS is who the courts have been colluding
    with to defraud the public:

    7. Now they have backed themselves into a corner of having to send me
    to jail for the word, "altered", which no one can state how it was
    used incorrectly OR they are going to have to drop the case.

    8. Either way, I win because of the amount of dirt that will come to
    public light if they send a never impeached US citizen to jail for
    the word, "altered"; or they have to back down on trying to shut me

    On 11/15/11, The Courthouse Gang wrote:
    > Maybe the court thinks you're "altered".
    > On 11/15/11, Sharon Kramer wrote:
    >> So now tell me again, WHY would the courts want me to stop
    >> writing of the case Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer Case No.
    >> GIN044539 North San Diego County Superior Court, which is a
    >> matter of public record and with the sole cause of action being
    >> the accusation that my five words, "altered his under oath
    >> statements" were libelous, and deemed to be so by the courts?
    >> Anyone else in the world could write the above sentence about a
    >> case that is a matter of public record. But the courts would
    > like
    >> to lock me up and throw away the key for it. Oh, and blog owners
    >> can't write or put evidence/court docs on the net of what
    >> actually occurred in the case either, or Kelman's and Hardin's
    >> attorney will use the US Postal Service to mail them a threat,
    >> interstate, of litigation.
    >> Could it be because the courts suppressed the evidence that
    >> Kelman committed perjury to establish needed reason for malice;
    >> made it appear my writing in question made an accusation it did
    >> not; concealed that ex-NIOSH product defender, Hardin, was an
    >> undisclosed party to the litigation for six years; while aiding
    >> the ACOEM BS over the mold issue on behalf of Chamber affiliates
    >> to be able to be used to sell doubt of causation in the
    >> courtrooms; while shifting workers comp insurers' responsibility
    >> onto the tax payers, to this VERY DAY!
    >> 3c5 ????
    >> Could that be why the courts want to lock me up for the
    >> word, "altered"?
    >> On 11/14/11, Deborah wrote:
    >>> That is an excellent idea.
    >>> BTW, most prisons have internet access albeit limited. Her work
    >>> will continue and no one is foolish enough now not to see the
    >>> rhizoid-like progression of conflicts of interest across several
    >>> professions concerning the indoor mold issue and the suppression
    >>> of the hard science and facts.
    >>> On 11/14/11, The Courthouse Gang wrote:
    >>>> Demand a pre-incarceration physical and mental examination
    >>>> and evaluation. Those cells (including the padded ones)
    >>>> might have some of that mold in there, and you want to be
    >>>> able to prove you were healthy when you went in.
    >>>> Since you can't blog from the inside, it's expected you'll
    >>>> be sending your accusations and complaints via the regular
    >>>> postal service. Please include an updated, detailed listing
    >>>> of all free people and inmates you believe are also part of
    >>>> the conspiracy. Collect calls will not be accepted.
    >>>> Remember, all calls are monitored.
    >>>> On 11/13/11, Mrs. Sharon Noonan Kramer wrote:
    >>>>> On September 11, 2011, I sent letters to the leaders of
    >>>>> Ca's judicial system, the Judicial Council, which is
    >>>> headed
    >>>>> by the CA Supreme Court Chief Justice.
    >>>>> Within the letters I provided a link to a website, Katy's
    >>>>> Exposure, where they could read the legal documents from
    >>>>> the public record of two cases: Kelman & GlobalTox v.
    >>>>> Kramer Case No. GIN044539 North San Diego County Superior
    >>>>> Court (filed 2005) & Kelman v. Kramer Case No 37-2010-
    >>>>> 00061530 CU-DF-NC, North San Diego County Superior Court
    >>>>> (2010)
    >>>>> I evidenced that in the first case the courts framed me
    >>>> for
    >>>>> libel while suppressing the evidence that US Chamber/ACOEM
    >>>>> mold policy author, Kelman, committed criminal perjury to
    >>>>> establish needed reason for malice while strategically
    >>>>> litigating in CA's courts for now over six years, over a
    >>>>> matter of public health.
    >>>>> And in the second case, the court issued a gag order that
    >>>> I
    >>>>> could not write of what occurred in the first case. The
    >>>> gag
    >>>>> order of May 2, 2011, is that I not republish the five
    >>>>> words that were the sole cause of action of the
    >>>>> case, "altered his under oath statements."
    >>>>> If unable to republish the words that were the sole cause
    >>>>> of action, I am also precluded from stating and evidencing
    >>>>> what occurred in the case, how the courts framed me for
    >>>>> libel to make my writing appear to state a false
    >>>> accusation
    >>>>> that it did not state, and what evidence was suppressed by
    >>>>> every judge of criminal perjury to establish malice, when
    >>>>> making their finding of libel with actual malice.
    >>>>> On September 13, 2011, we placed the letters to the
    >>>>> Judicial Council regarding the cases that are a matter of
    >>>>> public record, on the net at Katy's Exposure:
    >>>>> What I received in reply when seeking help to stop
    >>>>> corruption in the courts was on October 12, 2011, Kelman
    >>>>> and his attorney filed a Contempt of Court COMPLAINT.
    >>>>> Attached as the Exhibit of why I need to be sent to jail
    >>>> is
    >>>>> the September 13th posting on Katy's of the letters sent
    >>>> to
    >>>>> the leaders of CA's judicial system, evidencing the courts
    >>>>> framed me for libel & suppressed the evidence of Kelman's
    >>>>> perjury to establish malice (among many other
    >>>>> court "irregularities").
    >>>>> Kelman's October 12th COMPLAINT: (link takes a few seconds
    >>>>> to open)
    >>>>> On October 21st, being fully evidenced of what occurred in
    >>>>> the prior case and that the Exhibit attached to the
    >>>>> COMPLAINT is evidence of the courts colluding to defraud
    >>>> in
    >>>>> the prior case; the judge set a date for a Contempt of
    >>>>> Court hearing, Nov. 14, 2011. They were just going to wham
    >>>>> bam thank you mam, send me to jail for writing of a case
    >>>>> that is a matter of public record while stating the sole
    >>>>> cause of action of the case and seeking help from the
    >>>>> leaders of Ca's courts.
    >>>>> It doesn't work that way. On November 10th, I had an
    >>>>> ExParte hearing. Seems the courts forgot that you have to
    >>>>> serve someone with an Order to Show Cause (OSC) in person,
    >>>>> the accused has the right to face their accuser, and no
    >>>>> delivered OSC, no court jurisdiction for Contempt. (took
    >>>>> me 15 minutes in the law library to find that, the code
    >>>> and
    >>>>> case law. Wonder why a CA licensed attorney and a judge
    >>>> did
    >>>>> not know that?)
    >>>>> ExParte App of Nov 10th. (lol, we all know I can't tpye
    >>>>> wlel)
    >>>>> Now we have a Contempt of Court hearing scheduled for Jan
    >>>>> 6th. Pay no attention to the fact that the case is a
    >>>> matter
    >>>>> of public record of which anyone can write; and the
    >>>>> evidence of why I need to be sent to jail are letters to
    >>>>> the leaders of CA's judicial branch seeking help for
    >>>>> corruption in the courts as evidenced by legal documents
    >>>>> sent to them and via the Net.
    >>>>> I may not be a lawyer, but I am pretty darn sure that it
    >>>> is
    >>>>> criminal for courts to frame someone for libel while
    >>>>> suppressing evidence of a plaintiff's criminal perjury to
    >>>>> establish needed reason for malice...and then threaten to
    >>>>> incarcerate someone when they refuse to be silenced of
    >>>> what
    >>>>> occurred in a case that is a matter of public record. AND
    >>>>> what the courts KNOWINGLY did to aid insurer fraud in the
    >>>>> courtroom and in claims handling practices on behalf of
    >>>> the
    >>>>> affiliates of the US Chamber - not just in CA, nationwide.
    >>>>> It should be noted that the owner of Katy's Exposure blog
    >>>>> was mailed via the US Postal Service, interstate, a threat
    >>>>> of litigation by Kelman's attorney in May 2011, if she
    >>>>> continued to publish of a case that is a matter of public
    >>>>> record including the words that were the sole cause of
    >>>>> action. Neither she nor I have ever repeated the sole
    >>>>> cause phrase without discussing it in the context of the
    >>>>> public record case.
    >>>>> May 2011 Threat to Katy's.
    >>>>> So apparently, anyone else in the world except she and I
    >>>>> could write, "In the case of Kelman & GlobalTox v. Kramer,
    >>>>> which is a matter of public record, Kelman and Globaltox
    >>>>> sued Kramer for the words, 'altered his under oath
    >>>>> statements".
    >>>>> If I write it, even when evidencing criminal behavior in
    >>>>> the courts to the Judicial Council of CA via legal
    >>>>> documents from the public record case, I am going to jail.
    >>>>> If she publishes the evidence of what occurred in the
    >>>>> public record case, she will be sued for....something.
    >>>>> Needless to say, I am not going to be silenced of the
    >>>>> courts colluding with VeriTox to defraud the public on
    >>>>> behalf of the affiliates of the US Chamber. If I am going
    >>>>> to jail for the word, "altered" when in reality it is for
    >>>>> speaking and evidencing corruption in CA's judicial branch
    >>>>> at its highest levels, people are going to know why I am
    >>>>> there.
    >>>>> Seems like the courts are trying to make me a Poster
    >>>>> Child of the reason for the Occupy Wall Street movement.
    >>>>> Let's not forget, my "libelous" writing of March 2005 was
    >>>>> the first to publicly expose how ACOEM, VeriTox and the US
    >>>>> Chamber were connected in mass marketing the false concept
    >>>>> into public health, workers comp and to the courts that it
    >>>>> had been scientifically proven, "Thus the notion that
    >>>> toxic
    >>>>> mold is an insidious secret killer, as so many media and
    >>>>> trial lawyers would claim is Junk Science unsupported by
    >>>>> (cough, cough) actual scientific study." The next time it
    >>>>> was written of, was on the front page of the Wall Street
    >>>>> Journal.
    >>>>> Personally, I think they must have lost their minds at 455
    >>>>> Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA. Aka home of the CA
    >>>>> Judicial Council and the CA Commission on Judicial
    >>>>> Performance, if they think they can sweep this one under
    >>>>> the jailhouse rug.
    >>>>> Its billions in the defrauding of the public, aided by
    >>>>> leaders of the CA courts, by criminal means for now over
    >>>>> six years.

    Posts on this thread, including this one

  Site Map:  Home Chatboards Legal Jobs Classified Ads Search Contacts Advertise
  © 1996 - 2013. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.