Re: Mold Prevention coatings applied during new construction
Posted by T Moses on 12/04/06
On 11/09/06, Bill Cook wrote: > On 10/11/06, RemDude wrote: >> Jim - There are two simple precepts that apply to this industry: >> >> 1. It is illegal to apply an unregistered pesticide. >> >> 2. It is illegal to misapply a registered pesticide. >> >> Apparently, even those in the industry cannot seem to grasp these two >> precepts. So it is not surprising that the average builder, architect, >> homeowner gets confused over the marketing hype (lies) that is routinely >> dumped on them. Unfortunately, personal injury lawyers are the only ones who >> get it (or fortunately if you are a PI). There’s big bucks in mold litigation >> and application companies, builders, landlords, property managers, and >> architects are the juicy targets. >> >> Those who are breaking the law better wise up. The legal exposure they are >> shouldering is both real and substantial. Apply an unregistered pesticide or >> misapply a registered pesticide and face 7 years of potential liability of >> unknown limits. And all for a few bucks in their pockets today. I don’t see >> how breaking the law is worth all that. >> >> RD >> >> On 10/09/06, Jim Kelly wrote: >>> Why won't Am Mold respond to this post? The Internet is generally a good >>> place to dispel rumors and falsehoods, so why not a reply? >>> >>> I find this industry frustrating. Everyone claims they have the best product >>> and all claim to be following the law. But when you investigate the claims >>> seldom do the facts support the claims. Why can’t people in this industry >>> simply tell the truth and comply with state and federal regulations. Is it >>> impossible? >>> >>> Looking for some honest answers - >>> >>> Jim Kelly >>> >>> On 9/27/06, Just Checking wrote: >>>> No wonder why you stated “no need to investigate”. First of all, soda >>>> blasting has no EPA registration to it. Secondly, the EPA number you give >>>> is a sub-registration of Coating Systems Laboratories out of Chandler AZ. >>>> The product you reference is a form of ammonium chloride. To be effective >>>> one gallon covers 200 square feet. However, when reading the Master Label, >>>> no where does it state that “Zoonocide” can be used on wooden surfaces. To >>>> do so is in violation of FIFRA. Do you understand the liability associated >>>> with the improper use of a pesticide for both you and your customers? >>>> >>>> Care to comment? >>>> >>>> Just Checking >>>> >>>> On 9/27/06, Chad wrote: >>>>> I am a regional VP for American Mold Guard. Our process involves >>>>> removal of all visible mold from new construction using Arm & Hammer >>>>> Baking soda (soda blasting), then treatment of the cleaned sticks with >>>>> an EPA approved surfactant which will not allow mold to re-grow on any >>>>> treated surface (and we treat the ENTIRE frame). >>>>> >>>>> Our product is one of the few that acutally IS registered with the EPA >>>>> for use with wood framing. Our EPA product registration number is >>>>> 070087-000001-082653. No need to "investigate". >>>>> >>>>> Our process works quite well. Our website is www.AmericanMoldGuard.com >>>>> or call us at 877-MOLDGUARD. We do work from coast to coast for some of >>>>> the most reputable builders in the nation. >>>>> Are you registered in California?
Posts on this thread, including this one
|