Re: Class Action Defamation Suit against Barret/Fumento/Mill

More | Report Post

Watch it OZ! i saw the hot suffer
chick first. Mary aint speeless,
she's in LOOOVE!! with Woosta! Mary!
been having trouble sleeping? are
you having speech problems? does
your tummy ach? yep, just as i thot.
You need a batch of post it notes.
They cure love problems.

On 3/03/05, Ozarks Lawyer wrote:
>
>
> That in turn makes me speachless.
Must be a first time for
> everything.
>
>
>
> On 3/01/05, mary wrote:
>> See? And Speechless too...
>>
>> On 3/01/05, mary wrote:
>>> Wow...... I'm speachless....
>>>
>>> Mary
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/28/05, Patrick wrote:
>>>> Question: Which law firm can
find the legal foundation upon
>>>> which to file a class action
defamation suit against the
>>>> duly noted
Barrett/Fumento/Milloy/Gots/Stossel
and company
>>>> propaganda machine? Such a
lawsuit would be on behalf of
>>>> every Chemical Sensitivity
sufferer in the States, including
>>>> those Chemical Sensitivity
sufferers formally diagnosed with
>>>> the following titles:
>>>>
>>>> 1a] Occupational Asthma due to
low-molecular weight agents.
>>>> 1b] Irritant-induced Asthma.
>>>> 2] Chemical Worker's Lung.
>>>> 3] External Allergic
Alveolitis, aka Hypersensitivity
>>>> Pneumonitis "due to
chemical sensitization."
>>>> 4] Reactive Airway
Dysfunction Syndrome.
>>>> 5] World Trade Center Cough.
>>>> 6] Sick Building Syndrome; a
diagnostic title which is
>>>> even recognized in the
Merck Manual.
>>>> 7] Stevens-Johnson Syndrome.
>>>> 8] Acute Generalized
Exanthematous Pustulosi.
>>>> 9a] Chronic Actinic Dermatitis.
>>>> 9b] Occupational Dermatitis.
>>>> 10] Phthalic Anhydride
Hypersensitivity.
>>>> 11] And of course, the
Multiple Chemical Sensitivity which
>>>> is now recognized by
name, by the following
>>>> licensed & accredited
entities, in each one's
>>>> Occupatonal &
Environmental Medicine Programs:
>>>>
>>>> I] Johns Hopkins.
>>>> II] Mt. Sinai Hospital.
>>>> III] Yale.
>>>> IV] Cambridge Hospital
(affiliate of Harvard Med. School.)
>>>> V] Northeast Specialty
Hospital (also Harvard affiliate.)
>>>> VI] University of Medicine &
Dentistry of New Jersey.
>>>> VII] HealthPartners-Regions
Hospital, Minneapolis
>>>> (affiliate of the
NIOSH Educational Resource Ctr.)
>>>> VIII] Central New York Health
Occupational Clinical Center.
>>>> IX] Marshall University.
>>>> X+] a number of board
certified and licensed physicians.
>>>>
>>>> Plus, there is the
technologically advanced nation of
>>>> Germany which coded MCS as "an
allergic condition."
>>>> And there are also a notable
number of licensed entities
>>>> which recognize the titles:
>>>>
>>>> "Indoor Air Quality
Assessment", "Building-related
Illness",
>>>> "Sick Building
Syndrome", "Environmentally-related
>>>> Diseases", "Chronic Chemical
Exposure", "Chemically-induced
>>>> Illness", "Occupationally-
induced Illness", etc.
>>>>
>>>> And this includes the world
renown Duke, as well as Iowa
>>>> Univ., Boston Medical Ctr., the
Univ. of Maryland, and the
>>>> Univ. of Pittsburgh (home of
the polio vaccine and first
>>>> liver transplant.)
>>>>
>>>> Of course, there is the matter
of including CFS sufferers
>>>> and GWS sufferers. Of course,
GWS sufferers have apparently
>>>> suffered the most defamation of
all the Chemical Sensitivity
>>>> sufferers.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps, and only perhaps, a
subset of patients who were
>>>> diagnosed with the
following 'medically accepted'
diagnostic
>>>> titles can be included:
>>>>
>>>> 1] Chemically-induced
Hepatitis, 2] Chemically-induced
>>>>
>>>> Aplastic Anemia (Bone
Marrow Suppression).
>>>>
>>>> The subset, of course, would
consist in those who suffered
>>>> lingering sensitivity beyond
the acute stage.
>>>>
>>>> Such a lawsuit would not be
against any licensed practicing
>>>> physician, it seems. After
all, Barret was never board
>>>> certified at anything in his
life, and he never praticed
>>>> "physical" medicine since his
internship days, ending in
>>>> 1957. Gots hadn't had a
patient in decades, so say the
>>>> reports. As well, neither
Fumento nor Stossel nor Milloy
>>>> have ever been doctors in any
medical discipline. And of
>>>> course, the only non-licensed
(or non-Doctorate-bearing)
>>>> person qualified to give sound
& valid evidence into the MCS
>>>> matter is one who has suffered
from the physiological
>>>> medical condition for years.
>>>>
>>>> Nor would such a lawsuit be
against the pharmaceutical
>>>> industry, unless of course,
discovery would should that the
>>>> pharmaceutical industry funded
any of the defamatory
>>>> propagandists for producing the
defamatory things which they
>>>> did. That would be a
subsequent filing and joinder.
>>>>
>>>> The
Barret/Fumento/Milloy/Stossel &
company propaganda
>>>> machine employed slight-of-hand
semantics & convenient
>>>> evidence omission in asserting
to the inexperienced public
>>>> that Chemical Sensitivity is
entirely a process of mental
>>>> illness, instead of a
physiological process accompanied
with
>>>> the following physiological
medical findings:
>>>>
>>>> 1] Inflammation Scenarios,
such as Turbinate Hypertrophy
>>>> & Interstitial
Inflammation.
>>>> 2] Failing the Arterial Blood
Gases Test.
>>>> 3] Dermatitis scenarios and
similar.
>>>> 4] Enzyme QPon-1 Deficiency.
>>>> 5] Erythema, even internally.
>>>> 6] Over Production of
Leukotrienes, such as LTD4.
>>>> 7] The Production of N-acetyl-
benzoquinoneimine in
>>>> excess of the
Mercapturate which neutralizes it.
>>>> 8] Elevations of Alanine
Aminotransferase,
>>>> aka Serum Glutamic
Pyruvic Transaminase.
>>>> 9] Hyperactive Conjugations
and Deficient Conjugations.
>>>> 10] Visible and Measurable
Wheals during Skin Testing.
>>>> etc., etc., etc.
>>>>
>>>> And then there is the matter P-
300 Waves, IgA immunoglobins,
>>>> T-Cells, porphyira, and the
observable and non-deniable
>>>> symptom of Profuse Dry Heaving,
as well as that of
>>>> Blacking-Out. All in all, the
smoking gun was the Fiber
>>>> Optic Rhinolaryngoscopic Exam
and the medical findings
> thereof.
>>>>
>>>> The defamatory propaganda
resulted in the deprivation of
>>>> research funding. Furthermore,
how many ignorant persons in
>>>> America believed the
conclusions of Barret/Stossel/Fumento
>>>> and refused to accomodate a
chemical sensitivity sufferer in
>>>> a time of crisis? How much
suffering has that propaganda
>>>> machine caused? In as much,
all Chemical Sensitivity
>>>> sufferers have suffered triply:
>>>>
>>>> 1] at the hands of the illness,
>>>> 2] at the hands of a ruthless
form of defamation,
>>>> 3] at the hands of abandonment
for years, due to
>>>> little research funding and
outrightly lazy physicians
>>>> who make lots of money upon
one nitch repetitively,
>>>> steamlining their practices
to a comfortable laziness.
>>>>
>>>> At this point in time, the
plaintiff-class of Chemical
>>>> Sensitivity Sufferers would
have mainstream medicine on it's
>>>> side. After all, the AMA,
AAAAI, and American Lung
>>>> Association all recognize
Chemical Sensitivity as it applies
>>>> to the ASTHMA symptom. And the
AAAAI & AMA recognize it as
>>>> it applies to Dermatitis,
Aspririn/Salicylate Senstivity,
>>>> Ramin Wood Allergy,
Acetaminophen Intolerance, Red Cedar
>>>> Allergy, Peruvian Lily Allergy,
Isocyanate Sensitivity,
>>>> Phthalic Anhydride
Hypersensitivty, etc.
>>>>
>>>> Moreover, the AMA, AAAAI, & ALA
all advocate the practice of
>>>> AVOIDANCE as a necessary part
of treatment for the
>>>> chemically sensitive, as it
applies to asthmatics. Their
>>>> official literature enumerates
the same chemical-bearing
>>>> agents that MCS patients has
been avoiding for years, out of
>>>> instinct. And remember,
Barrett condemned the practice of
>>>> AVOIDANCE as detrimental, while
Fumento called the practice
>>>> "nonsense." Thus is the proof
that Barrett is the real
>>>> quack, speaking contrary to the
AMA & AAAAI. (Fumento is
>>>> simply a pushy-shovey brat who
needs to be put his place, as
>>>> all bully-brats picking on
helpless people need to be.)
>>>> Furthermore, comdemning the
practice of AVOIDANCE, while
>>>> asserting that Chemical
Sensitivity patients must be placed
>>>> in direct encounter with the
triggers that torment them, is
>>>> the act of inciting a crime
known in some jurisdictions as
>>>> TOXIC BATTERY. Thus, Fumento
and Barret have publicly
>>>> advocated the committing of
crimes.
>>>>
>>>> Proof that the AMA, AAAI, & ALA
recognize Chemical
>>>> Sensitivity, at least as it
applies to the ASTHMA symptom,
>>>> can be found at the following
mainstream medical sites:
>>>>
>>>> AMA Report 4 of the Council of
Scientific Affairs (A-98),
>>>> found at http://ama-
assn.org/ama/pub/category/13603.html
>>>> The other ones are found at:
>>>> http://bdapps/ama-
assn/org/aps/asthma/manage.htm
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
http://aaaai.org/patients/publication
s/publicedmat/tips/asthmatri
> ggersandmgmt.stm
>>>>
>>>
>>
http://www.lungusa.org/site/apps/s/co
ntent.asp?
> c=dvLUK9O0E&b=34706&ct=67442
>>>>
http://www.merck.com/mmhe/sec04/ch044
a/html
>>>>
>>>> The propaganda mahcine
fraudulently went about, claiming
>>>> that the AMA & AAAAI condemned
MCS as non-existent. This is
>>>> a lie. The AMA & AAAAI merely
declined to recognize the
>>>> specific title, Multiple
Chemical Sensitivity, as a
>>>> case-specific diagnostic title
of its own medical code.
>>>> This is because MCS is too
vague and non-case-specific of a
>>>> name. The AMA & AAAAI merely
said that more research was
>>>> needed to be done, in order
them to encapsulate MCS into a
>>>> meticulously defined and
analysed "case definition". And
>>>> though they did not recognize
Multiple Chemical Sensitivity
>>>> by name, they still recognized
the phenomenon of Sensitivity
>>>> of Chemicals.
>>>>
>>>> Mainstreams Medical Science has
long since recognized the
>>>> process of "sensitization."
And it has long since
>>>> recognized the phenomenon of
hypersensitivity to
>>>> chemical-bearing agents when
encountered by susceptible
>>>> persons, at commonly encounter
levels (at low to moderate
>>>> levels).
>>>>
>>>> The MCS debate has been game of
semantics. The anti-MCS
>>>> lobby went beyond the sound
barriers of obsecenity. All
>>>> contributing members must be
held accountable.