Re: Proof of Chemical Sensitivity in Mainstream Medical Rese
Posted by hmmm on 4/04/05
Can the class ask for itemized billing and use an auditor to
determine overbilling? On 4/02/05, mary wrote:
> Kevin:
>
> More the former. Unhappy class members. But, heck, I say open the
> gates....
>
> Mary
>
> On 4/02/05, Kevin wrote:
>> On 3/26/05, mary wrote:
>>> Well Pat (Other Pat?),
>>>
>>> The Journal article has nothing at all to do with any of the
>>> things in your question. It has only to do with the reality that
>>> class action counsel is not immune from being sucked into a
>>> class action. I personally think that is great. I looks, feels
>>> and smells like justice. I love it.
>>>
>>> Mary
>>
>>
>> Hey Mary:
>>
>> I haven't read the article. Does it suggest that class counsel
>> can be sued for malpractice by the class they represent(ed)? Is
>> it limited to malpractice, or can they be sued on a class-wide
>> basis for such things as inflated costs and expenses billed to
>> the class - i.e. trips w/girlfriends, entertainment like lap
>> dances, fishing trips, limos, chartered aircraft to fly to court
>> hearings only an hour's drive away, etc.?
>>
>> Kevin
Posts on this thread, including this one
- Now you are talking!, 3/24/05, by mary.
- Re: Now you are talking!, 3/24/05, by v.
- Re: Proof of Chemical Sensitivity in Mainstream Medical Research, 3/26/05, by Pat.
- Re: Proof of Chemical Sensitivity in Mainstream Medical Rese, 3/26/05, by mary.
- Re: Proof of Chemical Sensitivity in Mainstream Medical Rese, 4/02/05, by Kevin.
- Re: Proof of Chemical Sensitivity in Mainstream Medical Rese, 4/02/05, by mary.
- Re: Proof of Chemical Sensitivity in Mainstream Medical Rese, 4/04/05, by hmmm.
- Re: Proof of Chemical Sensitivity in Mainstream Medical Rese, 4/04/05, by Kevin.
- Re: Proof of Chemical Sensitivity in Mainstream Medical Rese, 4/04/05, by mary.
- Re: Proof of Chemical Sensitivity in Mainstream Medical Rese, 4/05/05, by Kevin.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/05/05, by Pat.
- Re: NBC Dateline & Rondal Gots' "Review firm", 4/05/05, by Pat.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/05/05, by Kevin.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/05/05, by mary.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/06/05, by Pat.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/06/05, by Mary.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/06/05, by Pat.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/07/05, by mary.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/07/05, by Pat.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/07/05, by mary.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/07/05, by Pat.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/07/05, by Mary.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/07/05, by Pat.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/07/05, by mary.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/08/05, by KHYF.
- Re: Protected Class Members*Mary*, 4/08/05, by v.
- Re: Protected Class Members*Mary*, 4/08/05, by Kevin.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/09/05, by DD.
- Re: Protected Class Members, 4/24/05, by Patrick Casanova.
- Re: Patrick Casanova are you out there?, 5/04/05, by The other Pat.
- Re: Now you are talking!, 5/23/05, by saundra vickers.
- Re: NBC Dateline & Rondal Gots' "Review firm", 4/17/07, by dEAN.
- Re: NBC Dateline & Rondal Gots' "Review firm", 4/17/07, by johncodie.
|
1996 - 2007. All Rights Reserved. Please review our Terms of Use, Mission Statement, and Privacy Policy.